Author Topic: SpaceX FH : USSF-52 (X-37B OTV-7) : KSC LC-39A : 28/29 December 2023 01:07 UTC  (Read 249796 times)

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10869
  • US
  • Liked: 15115
  • Likes Given: 6670
[Spaceflight Now - June 30, 2019] Barring a surprise, SpaceX’s next Falcon Heavy flight is planned in late 2020
Quote
After the AFSPC-44 launch, the Air Force plans another Falcon Heavy mission with SpaceX in the spring 0f 2021, Bongiovi said. That launch, designated AFSPC-52, was previously planned to lift off by September 2020, but in a briefing with reporters earlier this month, Bongiovi twice said the AFSPC-44 mission is the Air Force’s next Falcon Heavy mission.
« Last Edit: 03/15/2020 12:21 am by gongora »

Offline Nate_Trost

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
  • Liked: 47
  • Likes Given: 2
Now that the government has agreed to do GPS missions on reflown stages, I'm curious to see if this mission will still use new side boosters.
« Last Edit: 09/27/2020 02:37 pm by Nate_Trost »

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10869
  • US
  • Liked: 15115
  • Likes Given: 6670
I hadn't updated the date on this launch in a while.  With USSF-44 moving to late spring, it's extremely unlikely this flight would occur in the first half of 2021.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10869
  • US
  • Liked: 15115
  • Likes Given: 6670
Now that the government has agreed to do GPS missions on reflown stages, I'm curious to see if this mission will still use new side boosters.

That will be interesting to see.  They've already tested reused side boosters on a DoD launch (although it wasn't under the NSSL program).

Offline ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8610
  • Argyle, TX
  • Liked: 2500
  • Likes Given: 2161
Now that the government has agreed to do GPS missions on reflown stages, I'm curious to see if this mission will still use new side boosters.

That will be interesting to see.  They've already tested reused side boosters on a DoD launch (although it wasn't under the NSSL program).

I hope B1052 and B1053 get to fly for a third time. They've been in storage WAY too long.
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2240
  • Likes Given: 373
Now that the government has agreed to do GPS missions on reflown stages, I'm curious to see if this mission will still use new side boosters.

That will be interesting to see.  They've already tested reused side boosters on a DoD launch (although it wasn't under the NSSL program).

Things are unlikely to change until GPS III SV05 gets certified, but SMC has stated they would like to transition to fully reuseable Falcons within 18 months.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2240
  • Likes Given: 373
Quote
The following Falcon Heavy mission, another classified payload named USSF-52, will also require three new stages. That mission is expected to enable the recovery of all three stages: both side boosters and the center core.
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/09/spacex-manifest-falcon-heavy-arrives-mcgregor/

Offline Phillipsturtles

  • Member
  • Posts: 57
  • Florida
  • Liked: 95
  • Likes Given: 8
« Last Edit: 02/16/2021 01:59 am by Phillipsturtles »

Offline Tommyboy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 307
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 374
  • Likes Given: 598
Quote
The following Falcon Heavy mission, another classified payload named USSF-52, will also require three new stages. That mission is expected to enable the recovery of all three stages: both side boosters and the center core.
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/09/spacex-manifest-falcon-heavy-arrives-mcgregor/

Just wanted to point out that since all three boosters will be recovered, they must use three ASDS for this mission.

Therefore A Shortfall Of Gravitas *must* enter service before this mission.
Why three ASDSses? Maybe the boosters can RTLS and the code can land on an ASDS.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2240
  • Likes Given: 373
You’re right, I was looking at the GTO requirements for another mission and was thinking of those numbers.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2240
  • Likes Given: 373
I think this flight might be in October now.

https://fcc.report/IBFS/SES-STA-INTR2021-01859

Here’s the relevant bit if you don’t want to dig:
Quote
The spacecraft will be launched on or about October 9th, 2021 on a Falcon Heavy from the Kennedy Space Center. USUVL will rideshare on the vehicle with an unspecified US military spacecraft. USUVL will be injected into super-sync orbit on or about November 27th thru December 8th at which time USN will begin S- band support. The spacecraft is inclined at 2.8 degrees as to minimize potential interference with other geo spacecraft. The operators of USUVL have begun and will coordinate with other operators as to not cause interference as it moves around the geo-belt.

Looks like launch targeting 09 October 2021.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10869
  • US
  • Liked: 15115
  • Likes Given: 6670
I think this flight might be in October now.

https://fcc.report/IBFS/SES-STA-INTR2021-01859

Here’s the relevant bit if you don’t want to dig:
Quote
The spacecraft will be launched on or about October 9th, 2021 on a Falcon Heavy from the Kennedy Space Center. USUVL will rideshare on the vehicle with an unspecified US military spacecraft. USUVL will be injected into super-sync orbit on or about November 27th thru December 8th at which time USN will begin S- band support. The spacecraft is inclined at 2.8 degrees as to minimize potential interference with other geo spacecraft. The operators of USUVL have begun and will coordinate with other operators as to not cause interference as it moves around the geo-belt.

Looks like launch targeting 09 October 2021.

I doubt that is for USSF-52

Online scr00chy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1243
  • Czechia
    • ElonX.net
  • Liked: 1746
  • Likes Given: 1939
But isn't the super-sync deployment more in line with USSF-52 than USSF-44, which is going direct to GEO?

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10869
  • US
  • Liked: 15115
  • Likes Given: 6670
This is now scheduled for 2022.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2240
  • Likes Given: 373


At 33:33 he says a FH is already planned for side booster reuse, in a response to a question. He didn’t specify which one.

Edit: Around 39:20 he confirms the slip for USSF-52
« Last Edit: 05/19/2021 09:34 pm by Jansen »

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13529
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 9058
  • Likes Given: 90644
Cross-post:
Multiple USA launch updates from SFN Launch Schedule, updated June 7

Falcon Heavy / USSF-52
Launch date: Early 2022
Launch time: TBD
Launch site: LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline techdude06

  • Member
  • Posts: 31
  • Ohio
  • Liked: 25
  • Likes Given: 10
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1428864787702849542?s=19

The U.S. Air Force awards SpaceX with a $19.2 million modification to its AFSPC-52 mission contract, due to “a change in the contract requirements.”

The original launch award was worth $130 million, bringing the total now to $149.2 million. https://t.co/k3b3jxMqy2 https://t.co/dmtXSFJFGI


Sent from my KB2005 using Tapatalk


Online scr00chy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1243
  • Czechia
    • ElonX.net
  • Liked: 1746
  • Likes Given: 1939
https://spaceflightnow.com/2021/10/04/payload-issue-delays-spacexs-next-falcon-heavy-launch-to-early-2022/

Quote
The Space Systems Command spokesperson said the USSF-52 mission, the next national security launch on a Falcon Heavy, is scheduled for the second quarter of 2022.

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13529
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 9058
  • Likes Given: 90644
Cross-post:
With JRTI back in the que. The FH mission can go forward if the payload is ready. But once you get past the mid Mar for a launch date. All of the Crew Dragon and cargo Dragon flights one right after another would mean that it is either now (after the 3 Mar flight) or mid to late May.

Is there info as to if the payload is ready or not?
USSF-44 is not happening until next quarter [Q2 2022] at the earliest.

Assuming USSF-52 still follows USSF-44, it would now be NET June [2022]?

How long is a Falcon Heavy launch campaign?
Edit: 40 days from Crew DM1 to Arabsat-6A, in 2019, is the minimum thus far.
I assume/hope it will take less time now?
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6625
  • Liked: 4775
  • Likes Given: 5849
Cross-post:
With JRTI back in the que. The FH mission can go forward if the payload is ready. But once you get past the mid Mar for a launch date. All of the Crew Dragon and cargo Dragon flights one right after another would mean that it is either now (after the 3 Mar flight) or mid to late May.

Is there info as to if the payload is ready or not?
USSF-44 is not happening until next quarter [Q2 2022] at the earliest.

Assuming USSF-52 still follows USSF-44, it would now be NET June [2022]?

How long is a Falcon Heavy launch campaign?
Edit: 40 days from Crew DM1 to Arabsat-6A, in 2019, is the minimum thus far.
I assume/hope it will take less time now?

This contradicts the “next national security launch” statement from October.
https://spaceflightnow.com/2021/10/04/payload-issue-delays-spacexs-next-falcon-heavy-launch-to-early-2022/

Quote
The Space Systems Command spokesperson said the USSF-52 mission, the next national security launch on a Falcon Heavy, is scheduled for the second quarter of 2022.

From where was it learned that the order has been reversed?
« Last Edit: 02/28/2022 04:11 pm by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1