Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-16 (Dragon SpX-16) : December 5, 2018 - DISCUSSION  (Read 255679 times)

Offline CraigLieb

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1200
  • Dallas Fort Worth
  • Liked: 1358
  • Likes Given: 2441
Phone screen cap and magnified
On the ground floor of the National Space Foundation... Colonize Mars!

Offline chrisking0997

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
  • NASA Langley
  • Liked: 131
  • Likes Given: 317
impressed that it recovered as well as it did.  it stood so long Id have to think it would have survived if it had made the LZ
Tried to tell you, we did.  Listen, you did not.  Now, screwed we all are.

Offline ellindsey

  • Member
  • Posts: 66
  • New Jersey
  • Liked: 54
  • Likes Given: 10
There's already amateur footage of the landing attempt online.  It looks like one of the grid fins went hardover and got stuck.  Amazingly, the rocket managed to neutralize the roll and perform a soft touchdown anyway, but as it was on water it fell over and ruptured after touching down.

Offline whitelancer64

"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline bbell99

  • Member
  • Posts: 6
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 0

Elon Musk twitter

‏Grid fin hydraulic pump stalled, so Falcon landed just out to sea. Appears to be undamaged & is transmitting data. Recovery ship dispatched.

Offline kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1594
  • Somewhere on the boat
  • Liked: 1869
  • Likes Given: 1262

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
At T+ 7:00, the booster looked like the angle was way off the end of the landing burn. Then, at T+ 7:33, one of the gridfins was cranked all the way over and the other wasn't moving much at all as the spinning started.

It's easier to see both events if you watch the video, but here are two screen grabs.

Being at an angle end the end pf the braking burn is not that unusual in itself. See footage from previous RTLS day landings. But it might have been worse than usual.

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Well, it was bound to happen eventually.

Offline OnWithTheShow

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 349
  • Philadelphia, PA
  • Liked: 153
  • Likes Given: 27
This gives gives some evidence to the thread on whether stages target to undershoot, overshoot, or center the pad and then vector in after landing burn start up. It seems they may target an undershoot.

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1070386062164283392

I can't wait to see video of that... amazing if the landing burn was able to get it under semi control from that spin.

Offline chrisking0997

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
  • NASA Langley
  • Liked: 131
  • Likes Given: 317
Tried to tell you, we did.  Listen, you did not.  Now, screwed we all are.

Offline Tomness

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 673
  • Into the abyss will I run
  • Liked: 298
  • Likes Given: 744
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1070386062164283392
Hopefully they are able to recover it, not need another Gun Ship from the Air Force


Offline RedLineTrain

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2599
  • Liked: 2506
  • Likes Given: 10525
Amazing that it is still transmitting after going through that ordeal!

Offline Halidon

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 848
  • whereabouts unknown
  • Liked: 180
  • Likes Given: 535
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1070386062164283392
Hopefully they are able to recover it, not need another Gun Ship from the Air Force
Heh, I think it's a wee bit too close to civilization for that sort of option.

Offline deruch

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2422
  • California
  • Liked: 2006
  • Likes Given: 5634
This gives gives some evidence to the thread on whether stages target to undershoot, overshoot, or center the pad and then vector in after landing burn start up. It seems they may target an undershoot.
Or it successfully achieved a divert.
Shouldn't reality posts be in "Advanced concepts"?  --Nomadd

Offline weepingdragon

  • Member
  • Posts: 27
  • Liked: 18
  • Likes Given: 0
Before the "exciting stuff" happened had view of some sky writing. Anybody on the ground see what it said? Thought that was going to be something "new" to talk about during "routine" landings.  :'(

As far as the the round "ring" that came off. You can definitely see crystallization sticking out. Whether there is a physical object inside the ice or just ice that formed around a circular spot then released? No idea.  Will play around with zoom in vlc once downloaded.


Offline VoodooForce

  • Member
  • Posts: 94
  • Canberra
  • Liked: 78
  • Likes Given: 714
Damn these unflight-proven boosters  :o

Offline kessdawg

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Liked: 328
  • Likes Given: 1567

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
So, did the first stage have enough control left to deliberately divert to the ocean, or was the original trajectory to the ocean with a planned divert to the landing pad only if all was ok?

It likely relied on the lift vector to carry it to shore before landing burn and once it went into an uncontrolled spin, it pretty much went down where the reentry burn targeted it.

Tags: CRS-16 
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0