Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 : SAOCOM 1A : Oct. 7/8, 2018 : Vandenberg - DISCUSSION  (Read 59265 times)

Online woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8956
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 6187
  • Likes Given: 2096
Any news about Mr.Steven and fairing?

Mr. Steven didn't sail due to heavy seas in the recovery area. So, there was no attempt to catch a fairing.
Or as speculated above SpaceX won't attempt nighttime fairing recovery until they have success in daylight.
Lar was correct when he assumed that time of launch is much more predictable than sea state. SpaceX knew this launch would be in darkness, and so would be the descending fairings. Therefore, had the fairing attempt been called off due to darkness than SpaceX would not have rushed to get Mr. Steven ready for a catch attempt. But rush they did.

Online Olaf

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Germany
  • Liked: 670
  • Likes Given: 250

Online hootowls

  • Member
  • Posts: 51
  • Liked: 32
  • Likes Given: 1
Any news about Mr.Steven and fairing?

There was no planned fairing recovery attempt for this mission.

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9274
  • N. California
  • Liked: 5617
  • Likes Given: 952
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1049920490704388096
That's such a 50's photograph...  Bold days ahead!

-----
ABCD: Always Be Counting Down

« Last Edit: 10/10/2018 04:20 pm by meekGee »
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3136
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 776
  • Likes Given: 1256
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1049920490704388096
That's such a 50's photograph

-----
ABCD: Always Be Counting Down

I'm old enough to remember the early promise of the space shuttle but was born after Apollo. 

SpaceX's progress, launch, landing, resue and sending cars to Mars is the most exciting development in launch technology since the Saturn 5.

It feels like we are living in a 50's SciFi movie.
Needing a copy of 'Tales of Suspense #39'

Offline oiorionsbelt

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1414
  • Liked: 673
  • Likes Given: 1488
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1049920490704388096
That's such a 50's photograph...  Bold days ahead!

-----
ABCD: Always Be Counting Down


It has a Moonscape feel.

Offline r4mir3zx

  • Member
  • Posts: 29
  • Liked: 31
  • Likes Given: 7
Wow... has anyone noticed THAT GLORY AROUND MUSK'S HEAD?!?
Holy St. Musk!?! ;D

Offline JimO

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1911
  • Texas, USA
  • Liked: 340
  • Likes Given: 96
Some hints of additional sightings of the deorbit burn are coming in.

Offline garcianc

  • Member
  • Posts: 70
  • washington, dc
  • Liked: 81
  • Likes Given: 15
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1049920490704388096

Just as I was getting used to the fact that there is no LZ-3, now I have to learn that there is no LZ-4 and that it is "Falcon LZ-1 Vandenberg".  :(

What's next? Is someone going to tell me that the "F" in BFR stands for Falcon?  :o

Congrats SpaceX for making what was impossible not long ago seem routine. After all, that first landing (at the "other" LZ-1) was less than 3 years ago.




EDIT: This was tongue-in-cheek to make light of SpaceX's naming conventions...  :P
« Last Edit: 10/11/2018 07:53 pm by garcianc »

Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 137
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 259
  • Likes Given: 2310
SpaceX has been referring to the landing zone as LZ-4 everywhere: on their Twitter, on the official website, in the press kit and during the webcast. I guess it's just a typo in Elon's tweet.
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Offline Hauerg

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 775
  • Berndorf, Austria
  • Liked: 377
  • Likes Given: 1289

Online Prettz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
  • O'Neillian
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Liked: 135
  • Likes Given: 19
No updates about how this booster was taken down? I'm curious how long it took.

Offline deruch

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2407
  • California
  • Liked: 1968
  • Likes Given: 5250
No updates about how this booster was taken down? I'm curious how long it took.

The landing pad is on VAFB property and there's no line of sight to it from public areas.  Nor does the booster get transported off of base property to get returned to the refurbishment hangar like it does from CCAFS.  So, unless and until SpaceX decides to comment on the matter we won't publicly know anything.  Though there may be people with base access who might comment on it in L2.
« Last Edit: 10/16/2018 11:01 pm by deruch »
Shouldn't reality posts be in "Advanced concepts"?  --Nomadd

Offline CuddlyRocket

SpaceX has been referring to the landing zone as LZ-4 everywhere: on their Twitter, on the official website, in the press kit and during the webcast. I guess it's just a typo in Elon's tweet.
Hah! It'll be LZ-1 now that Elon's said it's LZ-1!

Reminded me of when HM Queen was opening a section - a tunnel or bridge, something - of a ring road in Birmingham and instead of saying 'I name this tunnel/bridge/something Queensway' she actually said 'I name this ring road Queensway' and Birmingham Council had to spend weeks renaming every other section on the ring road!

Offline Jdeshetler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 700
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Liked: 2434
  • Likes Given: 1732
SpaceX has been referring to the landing zone as LZ-4 everywhere: on their Twitter, on the official website, in the press kit and during the webcast. I guess it's just a typo in Elon's tweet.
Hah! It'll be LZ-1 now that Elon's said it's LZ-1!

Reminded me of when HM Queen was opening a section - a tunnel or bridge, something - of a ring road in Birmingham and instead of saying 'I name this tunnel/bridge/something Queensway' she actually said 'I name this ring road Queensway' and Birmingham Council had to spend weeks renaming every other section on the ring road!

President Johnson first announced in 1964 the existence of the RS-71, the Air Force two-seater Blackbird Johnson accidentally turned it around and called it the “SR-71.”.   

But still, this is not going to happened with LZ-4 at Vandy.

Offline king1999

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 273
  • F-Niner Fan
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 723

President Johnson first announced in 1964 the existence of the RS-71, the Air Force two-seater Blackbird Johnson accidentally turned it around and called it the “SR-71.”.   

But still, this is not going to happened with LZ-4 at Vandy.

Off topic but can't help :)

From wiki:
Air Force Chief of Staff General Curtis LeMay preferred the SR (Strategic Reconnaissance) designation and wanted the RS-71 to be named SR-71. Before the July speech, LeMay lobbied to modify Johnson's speech to read SR-71 instead of RS-71. The media transcript given to the press at the time still had the earlier RS-71 designation in places, creating the story that the president had misread the aircraft's designation.

Offline JimO

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1911
  • Texas, USA
  • Liked: 340
  • Likes Given: 96
Here is my summary report on observations of the launch in California.

Offline JimO

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1911
  • Texas, USA
  • Liked: 340
  • Likes Given: 96
Here is my summary report on observations of the deorbit burn over northern Europe.

Offline JimO

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1911
  • Texas, USA
  • Liked: 340
  • Likes Given: 96
Here is my summary report on public hysteria sparked by observations of the launch in California.

Offline codav

Here is my summary report on public hysteria sparked by observations of the launch in California.

Geat analysis! Must have taken ages to collect all the references and quotes.

But I've also got some constructive criticism: many slides of the report are written in capital letters, this is really hard to read - better use normal casing. Also, the presentation format is not optimal for this amount of text, I'd suggest formatting it as a structured document.

Tags: