Author Topic: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)  (Read 88355 times)

Offline Phil Stooke

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1386
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1455
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #220 on: 05/20/2023 05:10 pm »
The report suggests that the crash was about 100 km north of the center of Atlas crater.  The location depends on the angle of descent and is calculated for a vertical fall.  This should help LRO find it.

Offline eeergo

Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #221 on: 05/23/2023 02:06 pm »
The report suggests that the crash was about 100 km north of the center of Atlas crater.  The location depends on the angle of descent and is calculated for a vertical fall.  This should help LRO find it.

And found! Indeed close to Atlas (47.581°N, 44.094°E vs 46º 42' N, 44º 24' E for the crater).

http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/1302
« Last Edit: 05/23/2023 02:08 pm by eeergo »
-DaviD-

Offline Phil Stooke

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1386
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1455
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #222 on: 05/23/2023 03:34 pm »
Close, but not 100 km north of the crater as suggested by the earlier analysis.

Offline Phil Stooke

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1386
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1455
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #223 on: 05/23/2023 09:38 pm »
This is 5 km west of the target point illustrated in the landing simulation played during the landing.  There is no downrange spray of ejecta as at the Vikram and Beresheet impacts, indicating that the velocity was much lower than those impacts.  The lander hit at relatively low velocity and broke into pieces, of which just a few are large enough to resolve in the image. It will be interesting to see images with lower angle lighting and longer shadows.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #224 on: 05/24/2023 05:15 am »
https://twitter.com/ispace_inc/status/1661160547788943360

Quote
Thank you @NASAMoon and LRO Team for following our mission and sharing our lander’s location on the Moon.

We have been conducting a thorough analysis of the flight data received during M1’s operation and will announce the results on May 26th. Stay tuned for updates.

Offline Galactic Penguin SST

Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #225 on: 05/26/2023 08:13 am »
https://ispace-inc.com/news-en/?p=4691

ispace Announces Results of the "HAKUTO-R" Mission 1 Lunar Landing

26 May, 2023

Landing Anomaly Identified for Future Mission Improvements

TOKYO—May 26, 2023—ispace, inc., (ispace) a global lunar exploration company, announced today that it has reviewed and completed the analysis of the flight data from its HAKUTO-R Mission 1 landing sequence on April 26, 2023. The flight data was obtained by operations specialists at ispace’s Mission Control Center in Nihonbashi, Tokyo.

The analysis reveals that the lander fully completed the entire planned deceleration process, slowing to the target speed of less than 1 m/s in a vertical position at an altitude of approximately 5 kms above the lunar surface. Although the lander did not complete a soft landing, the cause has been identified and improvements are being incorporated into Mission 2 and Mission 3.

On April 26, 2023, at 00:40 Japan Standard Time, the lander began the descent sequence from an altitude of approximately 100 kms above the lunar surface. At the end of the planned landing sequence, it approached the lunar surface at a speed of less than 1 m/s. The operation was confirmed to have been in accordance with expectations until about 1:43 a.m., which was the scheduled landing time.

During the period of descent, an unexpected behavior occurred with the lander’s altitude measurement. While the lander estimated its own altitude to be zero, or on the lunar surface, it was later determined to be at an altitude of approximately 5 kms above the lunar surface. After reaching the scheduled landing time, the lander continued to descend at a low speed until the propulsion system ran out of fuel. At that time, the controlled descent of the lander ceased, and it is believed to have free-fallen to the Moon’s surface.

The most likely reason for the lander’s incorrect altitude estimation was that the software did not perform as expected. Based on the review of the flight data, it was observed that, as the lander was navigating to the planned landing site, the altitude measured by the onboard sensors rose sharply when it passed over a large cliff approximately 3 kms in elevation on the lunar surface, which was determined to be the rim of a crater. According to the analysis of the flight data, a larger-than-expected discrepancy occurred between the measured altitude value and the estimated altitude value set in advance. The onboard software determined in error that the cause of this discrepancy was an abnormal value reported by the sensor, and thereafter the altitude data measured by the sensor was intercepted. This filter function, designed to reject an altitude measurement having a large gap from the lander’s estimation, was included as a robust measure to maintain stable operation of the lander in the event of a hardware issue including an incorrect altitude measurement by the sensor.

One major contributing factor to this design issue was a decision to modify the landing site after critical design review completed in February 2021. This modification influenced the verification and validation plan despite numerous landing simulations carried out before the landing. ispace as the mission operator maintained overall program management responsibility and took into account the modifications in its overall analysis related to completing a successful mission. It was determined that prior simulations of the landing sequence did not adequately incorporate the lunar environment on the navigation route resulting in the software misjudging the lander’s altitude on final approach.

The analysis reveals that the cause of the lander’s failure to make a soft landing was due to the software, especially in the phase just prior to landing. This information will be incorporated into software design, as well as upgrades and expansion of the scope of preparatory simulations of the landing sequence for our future missions, including Mission 2 and Mission 3, to improve the accuracy of landing sequences.

Based on the fact that communications will not be reestablished with the lander, it has been concluded that the completion of the Mission 1 Milestones Success 9 (completion of the lunar landing) and Success 10 (establishment of stable conditions after landing), could not be achieved, and customer payloads could not be operated after the landing.

“Mission 1 demonstrated a great deal of technical reliability, as our lander reached the lunar surface just prior to landing. Now, we have been able to identify the issue during the landing and have a very clear picture of how to improve our future missions. While it is unfortunate that we were not able to fully meet the expectations of all our stakeholders, including our customers, all of us at ispace are proud of what we accomplished in Mission 1 and are very positive about what we can accomplish,” said Takeshi Hakamada, Founder and CEO of ispace. “We have already begun work on Mission 2 and Mission 3. We are prepared to face the challenges and make every effort to improve. We will ensure that the valuable knowledge gained from Mission 1 will lead us to the next stage of evolution. We believe that this is our commitment and our duty to all our stakeholders. ‘Never Quit the Lunar Quest’ In this spirit, we will continue to move forward.”

During Mission 1 the HAKUTO-R lunar lander completed Success 1 through Success 8 of the Mission 1 milestones. The lander was able to withstand the harsh mechanical environment of both the launch and deployment phases without sustaining damage to any of its elements. It then withstood a lengthy deep space cruise demonstrating its flight readiness. In addition, the lander performed well through multiple orbit control maneuvers, indicating that it can be operated in Mission 2 using the same Series 1 model as in Mission 1, without the need for any major modifications. The thermal design, communications, and electric power demonstrated functionality as planned, and based on analysis of the flight data, a more efficient operation can be achieved in Mission 2. At this time, there are no changes to the launch schedule for Mission 2 (scheduled for 2024) and Mission 3 (scheduled for 2025).

...
Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #226 on: 05/26/2023 01:14 pm »
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1662081831208902657

Quote
ispace is hosting a debriefing press conference on Mission 1, with CEO Takeshi Hakamada:

twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1662084001081831425

Quote
ispace CTO Ryo Ujiie explains that there "was a huge gap" of 3 kilometers between the estimated and measured altitude of the lander

https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1662084518075936768

Quote
Ujiie shows a slide from ispace's M1 flight data, and the differences between the measured and estimated altitude during the landing attempt:

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #227 on: 05/26/2023 01:30 pm »
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1662085106335379456

Quote
The white lines show the path of ispace's lander during the attempt:

Quote
ispace’s targeted landing site for Mission 1 is represented by the red dot, while the black circle shows where it crashed. The company came very, very close to fully succeeding on its inaugural lunar mission.

twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1662088298225975298

Quote
Hakamada on Mission 1's impact on the company's finances, with "no impact on the sales contracts" for missions 2 & 3:

https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1662089019927175169

Quote
An interesting note here: ispace says Mission 1 was insured, with liability coverage from Mitsui Sumitomo that represented "the world's first lunar insurance"
« Last Edit: 05/26/2023 01:38 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #228 on: 05/26/2023 04:16 pm »

Offline Phil Stooke

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1386
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1455
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #229 on: 05/26/2023 05:31 pm »
"ispace’s targeted landing site for Mission 1 is represented by the red dot, while the black circle shows where it crashed. The company came very, very close to fully succeeding on its inaugural lunar mission."

Actually the other way round - red dot is the impact site, black circle the target, which was published before the landing.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14177
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #230 on: 05/26/2023 06:58 pm »
Scott Manley on the crash of Hakuto:

« Last Edit: 05/26/2023 06:59 pm by Star One »

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12417
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10138
  • Likes Given: 8474
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #231 on: 06/20/2023 04:27 am »


Jun 19, 2023
Quote
Hakuto-R crashed while landing on the Moon April 25.  The craft's fault diagnosis logic incorrectly decided its altimeter was wrong, because it wasn't expecting the sudden change in measured altitude above the ground when passing over a crater.  While the original landing site was not in a crater, the landing location was changed late in the project to be in a crater.  Simulations that might have exposed the incorrect fault diagnosis were not run for the new landing site.  The craft thought it was still close to the ground, but was really 5 km above the landing site.  So, it descended slowly until it ran out of fuel, and then fell 5 km to crash.

The crash represented a failure in fault management.  The technical factors leading to this situation can mostly be traced back to inadequate design for redundancy of a key sensor, and failure to plan for what happened if it failed or was declared failed. With only 1 way to measure the crucial altitude, there was no way to cross check the reading, so it was too easily classified as failed.  The threshold for failure classification by high rate of change was not appropriate when craters were present.  No one checked if the threshold would be exceeded when flying over a crater edge to land there. 

Once the altimeter was ignored, apparently inertial navigation was used as the backup.  Using what the craft thought was the last "good" value for altitude (meaning, before reaching the crater) meant that it was wrong by 5 km.  Unfortunately, inertial navigation accuracy drifts quickly without the altitude measurement, and also cannot recover from a bad estimate at any point, without correction by realistic altitude estimates.  In control system terms, the system became unobservable, and control of the landing would eventually fail without observability.  Almost any landing was doomed without a real measure of altitude, but especially so once such a huge error was made. 

Alternative altitude estimates could and should have been used.  For instance, another sensor.  Or,  using cruise missile technology, matching against pictures to determine the position over the surface, and available lunar topographic maps to estimate the altitude at that location.

A separate video going into more depth on fault management is also available on the same YouTube channel, "Fault management overview (emphasizing aerospace)."
« Last Edit: 06/20/2023 04:27 am by catdlr »
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #232 on: 07/13/2023 09:08 am »
twitter.com/ispace_inc/status/1679397450883403782

Quote
Assembly, integration, and testing of our HAKUTO-R Mission 2 lunar lander flight model has begun at the JAXA Tsukuba Space Center (@TKSC_JAXA). (1/2)

#ispace #HAKUTO_R #lunarquest

https://twitter.com/ispace_inc/status/1679397454394056705

Quote
M2 will be operated using the same Series 1 model with fine-tuned software design, and early determination of landing requirements and thorough simulation planned. There are no changes to the launch schedule for M2 (scheduled 2024) and M3 (scheduled 2025) at this time. (2/2)

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #233 on: 07/25/2023 10:37 am »
https://twitter.com/ispace_inc/status/1683779412901105664

Quote
Having begun Mission 2 flight model Assembly, Integration and Testing, our engineers, together with our CTO Ryo Ujiie, filled this Daruma's 1st eye. Following Japanese tradition, its 2nd eye will be filled upon achieving the goal of successful AIT and launch, scheduled for 2024.

Offline LouisJ

  • Member
  • Posts: 6
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 14
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #234 on: 09/07/2023 06:57 am »
Financial Times piece with insights into ispace Tokyo

Quote
Japan’s ispace: the unruly start-up that shot for the Moon and missed
The FT delves into the events that led to the crash of the Hakuto-R lander in April and uncovers a corporate culture described by some as ‘toxic’

https://www.ft.com/content/a891387a-278f-434b-9ff8-791495aaad78

edit: removed attachment, per request
to get through the paywall: chrome incognito mode, then search for the title, then click first link. works most of the time.
« Last Edit: 09/14/2023 12:34 am by LouisJ »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #235 on: 09/28/2023 03:45 pm »
https://ispace-inc.com/news-en/?p=4781

Quote
ispace - U.S. Announces new U.S. Headquarters, Unveils APEX 1.0 Lunar Lander, Provides Updates on Mission 3

28 Sep, 2023

Strengthens U.S. operations, supporting American customers and enabling lunar lander and Moon exploration advancement

DENVER, Colo. – ispace technologies U.S. (ispace – U.S.), an American lunar exploration company providing Earth-to-Moon transportation and infrastructure capabilities, today announced its new U.S. headquarters in Denver, Colorado, where it is currently designing and has plans to manufacture its new APEX 1.0 lunar lander for future missions.
ispace – U.S.’ new headquarters establishes a central base of operations for the company to serve its American customers, including government, commercial, and academic organizations. In addition to enabling the design, manufacture, and operation of ispace – U.S’ APEX 1.0 lunar lander, which will launch from U.S. soil, the new facility positions the company as a strategic partner for a variety of American lunar exploration missions. ispace – U.S. intends to leverage ispace’s unique global presence consisting of entities in the United States, Japan, and Luxembourg to attract worldwide government and commercial customers for lunar missions.
“To date, ispace has already invested over $40 million in ispace technologies U.S., which represents our strong commitment to the U.S. market,” said Takeshi Hakamada, Founder and CEO of ispace. “We expect this number to continue to grow as part of our strategic commitment to contribute to government missions and the creation of a cislunar ecosystem from the United States.”
“Establishing a U.S. headquarters marks a pivotal new chapter in ispace – U.S.’ journey,” said Ron Garan, CEO of ispace technologies U.S. “Denver’s rich ecosystem of aerospace talent, cutting-edge research institutions, and robust infrastructure makes it the ideal home for our APEX 1.0 lander. Being just a short distance from key transportation hubs and the Denver Tech Center, we are strategically positioned to support America’s return to the Moon and beyond, primarily but not exclusively, through NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) Program.”
New U.S. Headquarters in Denver, Colorado
ispace – U.S.’ headquarters is currently staffed by more than 80 U.S. team members, with plans for exponential workforce growth, expanding to more than 100 by years’ end to support design and future production of the APEX 1.0 lander. The building and its location were carefully selected to support the company’s goal of offering Earth-to-Moon transport and infrastructure services.
Highlights:
● Located at 12876 E. Adam Aircraft Circle, a short distance from the Centennial and Denver International airports.
● Access to Denver’s robust aerospace community, including its large pool of highly skilled engineers and technicians.
APEX 1.0 Lunar Lander
ispace’s APEX 1.0 lander (former Series 2 lander) is one of the most capable lunar vehicles available. As the company’s next-generation lander, APEX 1.0 leverages lessons learned from its Series 1 lander on its first lunar mission in April 2023, and delivers enhanced capabilities. APEX 1.0 offers:
● Increased launch flexibility: The first planned mission for APEX 1.0 intends to fly a short duration trajectory to the Moon to increase launch flexibility and mission success. This trajectory trades payload capacity for fuel, but still enables APEX 1.0 to carry up to 300 kg to the lunar surface–more than 10x the capability of the Series 1 lander. ispace will progressively increase the APEX series’ payload capacity to meet evolving customer requirements, striving to reach 500 kg of payload capacity on future missions.
● Dedicated satellite bays, perfect for relay satellites to support direct-to-Earth communications in cislunar space and from the far side of the Moon.
● Ability to transport orbital, stationary, and mobile payloads to polar and equatorial locations on either the near or far side of the Moon.
● Advanced vibrational isolation to protect even the most sensitive payloads.
● Increased structural durability, reliability, and manufacturability, enabling consistent quality and performance at scale.
Mission 3 Schedule Updates
In 2022, ispace – U.S. joined a team led by Draper Laboratory to deliver a suite of three NASA-sponsored science payloads and numerous commercial payloads to the far-side of the Moon as part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program. As the lunar lander design agent on Team Draper, ispace – U.S. will leverage its APEX 1.0 lander for the CP-12 far side lunar mission.
Following the transition from the Series 2 lander to the APEX 1.0 lander, the launch of Mission 3 has been rescheduled from 2025 to 2026. The updated schedule enables Team Draper and ispace – U.S. to accommodate sensitive payloads by harnessing APEX 1.0’s enhanced capabilities for Mission 3, which is targeting a technically challenging landing location on the far side of the Moon. Additionally, the updated schedule will provide ispace – U.S flexibility to absorb experienced procurement delays for some long-lead items.
ispace – U.S. continues to make steady progress on Mission 3 and has completed its Mission Operations Preliminary Design Review (PDR), a milestone that marks the conclusion of all PDRs for the APEX 1.0 lander. The company anticipates completing Mission 3’s next milestone, Critical Design Review (CDR), not later than the fiscal year end of March 2024.
ispace’s Updated Financial Outlook(1)
Today, ispace, inc., has announced a revised full-year financial outlook based on a number of updates. The transition from the Series 2 lander to the APEX 1.0 and updated Mission 3 launch schedule has resulted in a downward revision of fiscal year March 2024 net sales to ¥3,050 million ($21.1 million), a ¥3,146 million ($21.7 million) decline from the original forecast. More than 90 percent of the decline is due to a delay in recording contracted sales of Mission 3 payload services compared to the initial forecast and carrying them forward to the next fiscal year or later. This is due to accounting treatment of cost recovery methods, under which the delay in cost generation for Mission 3 will automatically be reflected in a delay in recording sales. There is no significant change in the total amount of contracts related to Mission 3 expected as of today. Net Loss was revised upward by ¥3,385 million ($23.4 million) from the initial forecast to minus ¥4,504 million ($31.1 million). The increase is the result of extra-ordinary income due to the receipt of lunar insurance in August 2023.
(1) USD amounts are converted with JPY144.84/USD, which is the internal FX rate.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #236 on: 09/28/2023 10:09 pm »
The update doesn’t actually start until 1 hour 7 minutes into:


Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6828
  • Lafayette/Broomfield, CO
  • Liked: 4046
  • Likes Given: 1741
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #237 on: 09/29/2023 02:23 am »
https://ispace-inc.com/news-en/?p=4781

Quote
ispace - U.S. Announces new U.S. Headquarters, Unveils APEX 1.0 Lunar Lander, Provides Updates on Mission 3

28 Sep, 2023

Strengthens U.S. operations, supporting American customers and enabling lunar lander and Moon exploration advancement

DENVER, Colo. – ispace technologies U.S. (ispace – U.S.), an American lunar exploration company providing Earth-to-Moon transportation and infrastructure capabilities, today announced its new U.S. headquarters in Denver, Colorado, where it is currently designing and has plans to manufacture its new APEX 1.0 lunar lander for future missions.
ispace – U.S.’ new headquarters establishes a central base of operations for the company to serve its American customers, including government, commercial, and academic organizations. In addition to enabling the design, manufacture, and operation of ispace – U.S’ APEX 1.0 lunar lander, which will launch from U.S. soil, the new facility positions the company as a strategic partner for a variety of American lunar exploration missions. ispace – U.S. intends to leverage ispace’s unique global presence consisting of entities in the United States, Japan, and Luxembourg to attract worldwide government and commercial customers for lunar missions.
“To date, ispace has already invested over $40 million in ispace technologies U.S., which represents our strong commitment to the U.S. market,” said Takeshi Hakamada, Founder and CEO of ispace. “We expect this number to continue to grow as part of our strategic commitment to contribute to government missions and the creation of a cislunar ecosystem from the United States.”
“Establishing a U.S. headquarters marks a pivotal new chapter in ispace – U.S.’ journey,” said Ron Garan, CEO of ispace technologies U.S. “Denver’s rich ecosystem of aerospace talent, cutting-edge research institutions, and robust infrastructure makes it the ideal home for our APEX 1.0 lander. Being just a short distance from key transportation hubs and the Denver Tech Center, we are strategically positioned to support America’s return to the Moon and beyond, primarily but not exclusively, through NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) Program.”
New U.S. Headquarters in Denver, Colorado
ispace – U.S.’ headquarters is currently staffed by more than 80 U.S. team members, with plans for exponential workforce growth, expanding to more than 100 by years’ end to support design and future production of the APEX 1.0 lander. The building and its location were carefully selected to support the company’s goal of offering Earth-to-Moon transport and infrastructure services.
Highlights:
● Located at 12876 E. Adam Aircraft Circle, a short distance from the Centennial and Denver International airports.
● Access to Denver’s robust aerospace community, including its large pool of highly skilled engineers and technicians.
APEX 1.0 Lunar Lander
ispace’s APEX 1.0 lander (former Series 2 lander) is one of the most capable lunar vehicles available. As the company’s next-generation lander, APEX 1.0 leverages lessons learned from its Series 1 lander on its first lunar mission in April 2023, and delivers enhanced capabilities. APEX 1.0 offers:
● Increased launch flexibility: The first planned mission for APEX 1.0 intends to fly a short duration trajectory to the Moon to increase launch flexibility and mission success. This trajectory trades payload capacity for fuel, but still enables APEX 1.0 to carry up to 300 kg to the lunar surface–more than 10x the capability of the Series 1 lander. ispace will progressively increase the APEX series’ payload capacity to meet evolving customer requirements, striving to reach 500 kg of payload capacity on future missions.
● Dedicated satellite bays, perfect for relay satellites to support direct-to-Earth communications in cislunar space and from the far side of the Moon.
● Ability to transport orbital, stationary, and mobile payloads to polar and equatorial locations on either the near or far side of the Moon.
● Advanced vibrational isolation to protect even the most sensitive payloads.
● Increased structural durability, reliability, and manufacturability, enabling consistent quality and performance at scale.
Mission 3 Schedule Updates
In 2022, ispace – U.S. joined a team led by Draper Laboratory to deliver a suite of three NASA-sponsored science payloads and numerous commercial payloads to the far-side of the Moon as part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program. As the lunar lander design agent on Team Draper, ispace – U.S. will leverage its APEX 1.0 lander for the CP-12 far side lunar mission.
Following the transition from the Series 2 lander to the APEX 1.0 lander, the launch of Mission 3 has been rescheduled from 2025 to 2026. The updated schedule enables Team Draper and ispace – U.S. to accommodate sensitive payloads by harnessing APEX 1.0’s enhanced capabilities for Mission 3, which is targeting a technically challenging landing location on the far side of the Moon. Additionally, the updated schedule will provide ispace – U.S flexibility to absorb experienced procurement delays for some long-lead items.
ispace – U.S. continues to make steady progress on Mission 3 and has completed its Mission Operations Preliminary Design Review (PDR), a milestone that marks the conclusion of all PDRs for the APEX 1.0 lander. The company anticipates completing Mission 3’s next milestone, Critical Design Review (CDR), not later than the fiscal year end of March 2024.
ispace’s Updated Financial Outlook(1)
Today, ispace, inc., has announced a revised full-year financial outlook based on a number of updates. The transition from the Series 2 lander to the APEX 1.0 and updated Mission 3 launch schedule has resulted in a downward revision of fiscal year March 2024 net sales to ¥3,050 million ($21.1 million), a ¥3,146 million ($21.7 million) decline from the original forecast. More than 90 percent of the decline is due to a delay in recording contracted sales of Mission 3 payload services compared to the initial forecast and carrying them forward to the next fiscal year or later. This is due to accounting treatment of cost recovery methods, under which the delay in cost generation for Mission 3 will automatically be reflected in a delay in recording sales. There is no significant change in the total amount of contracts related to Mission 3 expected as of today. Net Loss was revised upward by ¥3,385 million ($23.4 million) from the initial forecast to minus ¥4,504 million ($31.1 million). The increase is the result of extra-ordinary income due to the receipt of lunar insurance in August 2023.
(1) USD amounts are converted with JPY144.84/USD, which is the internal FX rate.

I had a chance to attend their Grand Opening this evening for their new facility in Centennial. Apparently it was the old Boom Aerospace building (they recently moved into a new facility). Pretty nice all told. Tons of engineering space and large high bay.

~Jon

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33122
  • Likes Given: 8901
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #238 on: 09/29/2023 08:08 am »
Image of the APEX 1.0 lander.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ispace (Japan) Lunar Landers (HAKUTO-R)
« Reply #239 on: 10/07/2023 01:40 pm »
https://www.ft.com/content/a891387a-278f-434b-9ff8-791495aaad78

Quote
Japan’s ispace: the unruly start-up that shot for the Moon and missed

The FT delves into the events that led to the crash of the Hakuto-R lander in April and uncovers a corporate culture described by some as ‘toxic’

Kana Inagaki and Leo Lewis in Tokyo SEPTEMBER 7 2023

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1