Author Topic: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5  (Read 1037102 times)

Offline Alexphysics

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1625
  • Spain
  • Liked: 6027
  • Likes Given: 952
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #540 on: 03/11/2019 09:26 pm »
Guys, remember the chart is using "FY2019" which ends in October 2019. CRS-19 is still scheduled for December 2019... (which falls under FY2020)

Offline Roy_H

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1209
    • Political Solutions
  • Liked: 450
  • Likes Given: 3163
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #541 on: 03/24/2019 05:01 pm »
Shouldn't Arabsat 6A be listed as GEO not GTO?
"If we don't achieve re-usability, I will consider SpaceX to be a failure." - Elon Musk
Spacestation proposal: https://politicalsolutions.ca/forum/index.php?topic=3.0

Online ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8495
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2104
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #542 on: 03/24/2019 05:19 pm »
Shouldn't Arabsat 6A be listed as GEO not GTO?

I don't recall any sources saying that Arabsat 6A is being placed directly into GEO.

I'm pretty convinced that it'll only be a GTO trajectory with all three boosters being recovered.
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Online Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5353
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #543 on: 04/06/2019 05:15 am »
I just saw a presentation on a cubesat that will ride to the ISS as internal cargo on CRS/SpX-19.
It had a launch date of Dec 4
That was remarkably specific for 8 months out.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50706
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85223
  • Likes Given: 38177
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #544 on: 04/11/2019 09:21 pm »
Quote
April 11, 2019
RELEASE C19-009

NASA Awards Launch Services Contract for Asteroid Redirect Test Mission
NASA has selected SpaceX in Hawthorne, California, to provide launch services for the agency’s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission, the first-ever mission to demonstrate the capability to deflect an asteroid by colliding a spacecraft with it at high speed – a technique known as a kinetic impactor.

The total cost for NASA to launch DART is approximately $69 million, which includes the launch service and other mission related costs.

The DART mission currently is targeted to launch in June 2021 on a Falcon 9 rocket from Space Launch Complex 4E at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. By using solar electric propulsion, DART will intercept the asteroid Didymos’ small moon in October 2022, when the asteroid will be within 11 million kilometers of Earth.

NASA’s Launch Services Program at Kennedy Space Center in Florida will manage the SpaceX launch service. The DART Project office is located at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, and is managed by the Planetary Missions Program Office at Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, for NASA’s Planetary Defense Coordination Office in Washington.

For more information about NASA programs and missions, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-awards-launch-services-contract-for-asteroid-redirect-test-mission

Edit to add:

Started a new thread https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=47871.0
« Last Edit: 04/11/2019 09:24 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Online smoliarm

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 833
  • Moscow, Russia
  • Liked: 720
  • Likes Given: 612
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #545 on: 04/16/2019 01:28 pm »
Updated FPIP:
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=43418.msg1704237#msg1704237
Corrections/suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Specific question: should I show on the graph those air-launches (Pegasus/"Stargazer", LauncherOne/"Cosmic Girl") which are going from Cape or Vandenberg? Would they have significant interference schedule-wise?

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #546 on: 04/16/2019 03:13 pm »
Specific question: should I show on the graph those air-launches (Pegasus/"Stargazer", LauncherOne/"Cosmic Girl") which are going from Cape or Vandenberg? Would they have significant interference schedule-wise?

Neither of those vehicles is in service yet, the launch rate they will achieve is currently unknown, and how much they will use each launch site is unknown, so I wouldn't worry about showing them yet.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #547 on: 04/19/2019 04:17 pm »
SpaceX CRS-17 Launch Now Scheduled for April 30

Sarah Loff Posted on April 19, 2019

A SpaceX Dragon cargo spacecraft is now scheduled to launch at 4:22 a.m. EDT on Tuesday, April 30, on a Falcon 9 rocket from Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. This will be SpaceX’s 17th Commercial Resupply Services contract mission to the International Space Station for NASA.

SpaceX will take advantage of the additional time to perform a static fire test and pre-flight checkouts. Falcon 9 and Dragon are on track to be flight ready for an earlier launch attempt, however, April 30 is the most viable date for both NASA and SpaceX due to station and orbital mechanics constraints.

NASA will host a media teleconference at 11 a.m. Monday, April 22, to discuss select science investigations the Dragon will deliver to the astronauts living and working aboard the orbiting laboratory. NASA will stream audio from the discussion at http://www.nasa.gov/live.

https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/2019/04/19/spacex-crs-17-launch-now-scheduled-for-april-30/

Offline pb2000

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
  • Calgary, AB
  • Liked: 759
  • Likes Given: 237
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #548 on: 04/23/2019 06:30 pm »
Looks like CRS-17 is now ASDS; also, do we still consider the FH center core to be a successful landing?
Launches attended: Worldview-4 (Atlas V 401), Iridium NEXT Flight 1 (Falcon 9 FT), PAZ+Starlink (Falcon 9 FT), Arabsat-6A (Falcon Heavy)
Pilgrimaged to: Boca Chica (09/19 & 01/22)

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #549 on: 04/23/2019 08:15 pm »
Landing type updated for CRS-17 and Starlink.  Discussion of how to format a particular type of return in the table should take place in the table formatting thread (see link in top post).

Online Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5353
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #550 on: 04/23/2019 09:49 pm »
It has been posted that the STP-2 launch recovery is supposed to be LZ1-ASDS-LS2 or LSL.
(Somewhere it was posted that the ASDS will be only 27 km downrange.)
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50706
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85223
  • Likes Given: 38177

Online Chris Bergin

Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50706
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85223
  • Likes Given: 38177
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #553 on: 05/08/2019 08:25 am »
Direct quotes from Gwynne yesterday:

Quote
“In 2017 we launched 18 times, in 2018 we launched 21 times,” Shotwell said. “This year, depending on customer readiness, we could launch between 18 and 21 times. Next year, 16-20 launches in the manifest. We’ve signed 22 deals since this show last year. So we’re still still seeing pretty strong uptake of our services and then Starlink would be on top of that.”

https://www.spaceintelreport.com/for-its-starlink-satellite-constellation-still-a-mystery-spacex-to-launch-dozens-of-test-satellites-on-may-15/

Offline Norm38

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1721
  • Liked: 1285
  • Likes Given: 2349
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #554 on: 05/13/2019 01:51 pm »
I don't know where all of those "18-21" launches without Starlink are coming from, we don't have anything close to that on the publicly known manifest.
That’s because there are several launches planned for payloads which are not on the public manifest.

They've launched 5 so far, 1 per month.  Gwen made that comment after the Dragon 2 failure, so the commercial crew flights are now in doubt for '19.  Ignoring D2 and Starlink flights, they only have 8 more missions on the manifest for '19.  That's 13 missions.

So they have at least 5 secret missions ready to pop up at a moment's notice?  That's kinda crazy to think about.

Offline Stefan.Christoff.19

  • Member
  • Posts: 60
  • RI USA
  • Liked: 75
  • Likes Given: 78
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #555 on: 05/14/2019 02:24 pm »
Couple of the posts in the Starlink launch update thread and the Reddit core wiki page show the core as 1049.3

Offline oldAtlas_Eguy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Florida
  • Liked: 5010
  • Likes Given: 1511
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #556 on: 05/15/2019 01:52 pm »
From the press kit the Starlink mass of 227kg  gives 13,600kg for launch. Orbit looks like 440km circular for payload release.

Edit:
Forgot to name mission.
« Last Edit: 05/15/2019 01:54 pm by oldAtlas_Eguy »

Offline rockets4life97

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 800
  • Liked: 538
  • Likes Given: 367
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #557 on: 05/23/2019 12:16 pm »
In light of the Anasis-II (KMilSatCom1) showing up on SpaceX's manifest recently, I have identified 6 other payloads from Gunter's space page with unknown launch vehicles that were ordered between 2014 and 2016. According to Gunter, Anasis-II was ordered in 2016.

The 6 possible payloads for SpaceX listed as having an unknown launcher by Gunter are: Turksat 6A, Inmarsat-6 F1 & F2, Silkwave I, DirecTV 16, and SatKomHan1.

Four more satellites in 2017 and an additional four in 2018 were ordered without known launchers.

Online smoliarm

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 833
  • Moscow, Russia
  • Liked: 720
  • Likes Given: 612
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #558 on: 05/23/2019 12:55 pm »
In light of the Anasis-II (KMilSatCom1) showing up on SpaceX's manifest recently, I have identified 6 other payloads from Gunter's space page with unknown launch vehicles that were ordered between 2014 and 2016. According to Gunter, Anasis-II was ordered in 2016.

The 6 possible payloads for SpaceX listed as having an unknown launcher by Gunter are: Turksat 6A, Inmarsat-6 F1 & F2, Silkwave I, DirecTV 16, and SatKomHan1.

Four more satellites in 2017 and an additional four in 2018 were ordered without known launchers.

- Some notes of these sats:
Turksat 6A
It is the very first GEO-comsat built by Turkish industry, it is planned to be finished "late 2020" - but delays are VERY likely.
(actually, the fact that there is no word on launch contract yet - hints on delay...)

Inmarsat
- have signed launch agreement with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI), so most likely, H-II wll be used for Inmarsat-6 F1. Also, IIRC, the launch Inmarsat-6 F1 is NET 2020.
For the second Inmarsat-6 - Inmarsat has launch options with SpaceX and with ILS...

Silkwave I
- no word on launch provider or when the launch is planned.

SatKomHan 1
- same as Silkwave :(

DirecTV 16
- going up in June on Ariane 5ECA with Eutelsat 7C


Offline ZachF

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
  • Immensely complex & high risk
  • NH, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 2679
  • Likes Given: 537
Re: SpaceX Manifest Updates Thread 5
« Reply #559 on: 05/24/2019 03:48 pm »
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1131946588597829634

Quote
Falcon 9 launches 60 Starlink satellites to orbit – targeting up to 6 Starlink launches this year and will accelerate our cadence next year to put ~720 satellites in orbit for continuous coverage of most populated areas on Earth

It seems SpaceX is targeting 12 Starlink launches next year
artist, so take opinions expressed above with a well-rendered grain of salt...
https://www.instagram.com/artzf/

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1