Author Topic: Firefly Space : Company and Development General Thread  (Read 485035 times)

Offline whitelancer64

Quite unexpected that he gave away his entire stock for free, but given the situation in Ukraine right now I don't know how could have expected to keep his stock. On the otherhand, this is good news for Firefly as a company as it means they should be able to move forward without further delays.

I don't think he wanted to sell controlling interest in Firefly to an outside investor.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
It does seem pretty unfair.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline TrevorMonty

Polyakov has to first sell his ~0.5 bil $ stake so that they can do launches again; so the 300 mil raise actually has to raise 800 mil.
Or it could be sold for 1$. Bit sad for Max though.

https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1494072439235559426
Quite unexpected that he gave away his entire stock for free, but given the situation in Ukraine right now I don't know how could have expected to keep his stock. On the otherhand, this is good news for Firefly as a company as it means they should be able to move forward without further delays.
He sold it to Tom Markusic for $1. Suspect he'll buy it back in future for same price.

Sent from my SM-G570Y using Tapatalk


Offline TrevorMonty

On plus side Alpha can now fly.

This my 2nd favorite launch company behind RL so happy to see them return to flight.

Sent from my SM-G570Y using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: 02/16/2022 10:52 pm by TrevorMonty »

Offline niwax

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1428
  • Germany
    • SpaceX Booster List
  • Liked: 2045
  • Likes Given: 166
The upside is that Tom Markusic now appears to be firmly in control of Firefly. He is an excellent engineer and manager, by all accounts, plus now with a high enough stake to keep control through some serious fundraising.
Which booster has the most soot? SpaceX booster launch history! (discussion)

Offline ringsider

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Liked: 508
  • Likes Given: 98
The upside is that Tom Markusic now appears to be firmly in control of Firefly.

"Appears to be"... Legally this might be true but there have been cases like this where former owners continue to exercise shadow control via a puppet front man after such a generous gift.

I suspect this grand gesture will not satisfy all those national security authorities - they will look for a genuine sale to an unrelated 3rd party who cannot be influenced off the books.
« Last Edit: 02/17/2022 03:18 am by ringsider »

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768
On plus side Alpha can now fly.

This my 2nd favorite launch company behind RL so happy to see them return to flight.

Sent from my SM-G570Y using Tapatalk

The process is not that fast. Some interagency paperwork and other bits and bobs to reverse the government ordered company freeze.

Offline ParabolicSnark

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 150
  • CA
  • Liked: 191
  • Likes Given: 125
The upside is that Tom Markusic now appears to be firmly in control of Firefly.

"Appears to be"... Legally this might be true but there have been cases like this where former owners continue to exercise shadow control via a puppet front man after such a generous gift.

I suspect this grand gesture will not satisfy all those national security authorities - they will look for a genuine sale to an unrelated 3rd party who cannot be influenced off the books.

I concur. This looks to be a superficial farce and even if it meets certain legal obligations, I'm sure they'd find another rationale for holding it up. Selling the stake for a $1 is an indicator that Markusic and Polyakov are buddy-buddy and makes it clear that the foreign influence issue isn't resolved, just disguised...poorly. Pouting about it on Twitter also lends credibility to the issue being valid, especially with the line "Max love Ukraine" - how was that supposed to assuage the DoD's concern that the technology won't migrate to Ukraine?

Offline TrevorMonty



The upside is that Tom Markusic now appears to be firmly in control of Firefly.

"Appears to be"... Legally this might be true but there have been cases like this where former owners continue to exercise shadow control via a puppet front man after such a generous gift.

I suspect this grand gesture will not satisfy all those national security authorities - they will look for a genuine sale to an unrelated 3rd party who cannot be influenced off the books.

I concur. This looks to be a superficial farce and even if it meets certain legal obligations, I'm sure they'd find another rationale for holding it up. Selling the stake for a $1 is an indicator that Markusic and Polyakov are buddy-buddy and makes it clear that the foreign influence issue isn't resolved, just disguised...poorly. Pouting about it on Twitter also lends credibility to the issue being valid, especially with the line "Max love Ukraine" - how was that supposed to assuage the DoD's concern that the technology won't migrate to Ukraine?

The Ukraine government should be concerned about Firefly's USA engineers acquiring Ukraine turbopump technology.

Sent from my SM-G570Y using Tapatalk


Offline ringsider

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Liked: 508
  • Likes Given: 98
The upside is that Tom Markusic now appears to be firmly in control of Firefly.

"Appears to be"... Legally this might be true but there have been cases like this where former owners continue to exercise shadow control via a puppet front man after such a generous gift.

I suspect this grand gesture will not satisfy all those national security authorities - they will look for a genuine sale to an unrelated 3rd party who cannot be influenced off the books.

I concur. This looks to be a superficial farce and even if it meets certain legal obligations, I'm sure they'd find another rationale for holding it up. Selling the stake for a $1 is an indicator that Markusic and Polyakov are buddy-buddy and makes it clear that the foreign influence issue isn't resolved, just disguised...poorly. Pouting about it on Twitter also lends credibility to the issue being valid, especially with the line "Max love Ukraine" - how was that supposed to assuage the DoD's concern that the technology won't migrate to Ukraine?
What is an interesting topic is why this came to a head now. My working hypothesis is that competitors with a deep reach into USG didn't like the look of Firefly being so successful on the first launch last September and used their contacts and influence to bring some heat. It is not that hard to think of 2-3 candidates with the right kind of connections.
« Last Edit: 02/17/2022 03:02 pm by ringsider »

Transferring US engine technology would've been illegal no matter who owned the company, so if that is the concern then this has all been rather irrational. I totally agree that this "sale" won't satisfy those that in the government that have concerns, but now that Firefly is totally US owned, I don't see what else they can do. And I suspect that any attempt to do more will see the government laughed out of court.
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
I concur. This looks to be a superficial farce and even if it meets certain legal obligations, I'm sure they'd find another rationale for holding it up. Selling the stake for a $1 is an indicator that Markusic and Polyakov are buddy-buddy and makes it clear that the foreign influence issue isn't resolved, just disguised...poorly. Pouting about it on Twitter also lends credibility to the issue being valid, especially with the line "Max love Ukraine" - how was that supposed to assuage the DoD's concern that the technology won't migrate to Ukraine?
What is an interesting topic is why this came to a head now. My working hypothesis is that competitors with a deep reach into USG didn't like the look of Firefly being so successful on the first launch last September and used their contacts and influence to bring some heat. It is not that hard to think of 2-3 candidates with the right kind of connections.

I doubt such a conspiracy. And I also suspect there is more to Max than we know. Some Russian connections? Why else would he write "Max love Ukraine and yes I have Ukrainian passport?" Such a bewildering statement, everyone knows he is Ukrainian after all.  :o

Offline savantu

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 227
  • Romania
  • Liked: 293
  • Likes Given: 131
Transferring US engine technology would've been illegal no matter who owned the company, so if that is the concern then this has all been rather irrational. I totally agree that this "sale" won't satisfy those that in the government that have concerns, but now that Firefly is totally US owned, I don't see what else they can do. And I suspect that any attempt to do more will see the government laughed out of court.

What US engine technology ?

What is an interesting topic is why this came to a head now. My working hypothesis is that competitors with a deep reach into USG didn't like the look of Firefly being so successful on the first launch last September and used their contacts and influence to bring some heat. It is not that hard to think of 2-3 candidates with the right kind of connections.

I doubt such a conspiracy. And I also suspect there is more to Max than we know. Some Russian connections? Why else would he write "Max love Ukraine and yes I have Ukrainian passport?" Such a bewildering statement, everyone knows he is Ukrainian after all.  :o

'What you said is a conspiracy theory; anyway, here's my conspiracy theory.'

Or, or maybe, and just hear me out here; maybe the man is just bad with English. It's not like that statement was super coherent otherwise. And while I'm here; maybe there isn't a conspiracy of competitors with USG connections (and who would that be btw? ABL? Relativity? What connections do they have?), but instead, the USG just did this now because Ukraine-Russia tensions are high right now.
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

Transferring US engine technology would've been illegal no matter who owned the company, so if that is the concern then this has all been rather irrational. I totally agree that this "sale" won't satisfy those that in the government that have concerns, but now that Firefly is totally US owned, I don't see what else they can do. And I suspect that any attempt to do more will see the government laughed out of court.

What US engine technology ?

My understanding is that the Ukrainians helped a lot with turbopump design, but that essentially all of the rest of the Reaver 1 and Lightning engines were designed totally state-side. That would include the injector, which is one of the main things ITAR regulates.
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1494481273158610961

Quote
The Firefly team is laser-focused on reaching orbit this year. With the successful stage 2 hotfire today, both stages of our flight 2 Alpha vehicle have now completed acceptance testing and are ready for flight. See you on the pad.  youtu.be/4T1DeCFRJW0 #makingspaceforeveryone


Offline lrk

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 755
  • Likes Given: 1127
My understanding is that a significant number of engine components (turbopumps, etc.) were being manufactured in the Ukraine.  I would guess they have parts in the US for at least a couple more rockets, but how long will it take them to move all manufacturing state-side? 

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
My understanding is that a significant number of engine components (turbopumps, etc.) were being manufactured in the Ukraine.  I would guess they have parts in the US for at least a couple more rockets, but how long will it take them to move all manufacturing state-side? 
Why wouldn't they be able to continue importing parts?  ULA does it (Russia and Europe).  Northrop Grumman does it (Russia and Ukraine).  NASA does it (Orion ESM from Europe).  Etc. 

 - Ed Kyle   

My understanding was that while they used Ukrainian tech and designs in places, that everything was manufactured in the US.
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6494
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 9936
  • Likes Given: 43
My understanding was that while they used Ukrainian tech and designs in places, that everything was manufactured in the US.
At least some components are manufactured by Yuzmash: https://ain.ua/en/2019/11/01/pivdenmash-receives-order-from-firefly/

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1