Author Topic: Firefly Space : Company and Development General Thread  (Read 485046 times)

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157


Quote
The quest for space travel inspires STEM interest like no other endeavor.  Firefly has promoted that interest by opening its doors to youth though Firefly Academy, the Base11 Challenge, and the Firefly International Rocket Event (FIRE).  Firefly is taking their STEM commitment literally to the next level, by announcing a global competition to host academic and educational payloads, free of charge, on the inaugural flight of the Firefly Alpha launch vehicle.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Some nice hardware shots, including first flight vehicle, in this preview of forthcoming documentary:


Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1295383702437015553

Quote
Alpha Stage 1 Flight Acceptance testing has begun.

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7952
  • Likes Given: 77596
Cross-post:
https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/07/rocket-report-dod-rescinds-rocket-awards-europeans-talk-up-ariane-7/
Quote
Firefly now targeting mid-October for Alpha launch. In a recent interview, Firefly's founder, Tom Markusic, said the company has lost a month of schedule due to a test-stand fire in January and perhaps one to two months due to COVID-19. "The plan is now mid-October this year, which does represent a couple of months slip from earlier," he told Connectivity Business about the Alpha rocket's first launch. "Overall, I think we've been very fortunate in both incidents that we weren't set back for a longer duration."
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1296086487159775235

Quote
Flight 1 payload section (foreground) and stage 1 (background) both undergoing flight acceptance testing.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1297240004931002369

Quote
A beautiful morning in Briggs, Texas! #GoAlpha #ReaverPower

Online harrystranger

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Brisbane, Australia
  • Liked: 2803
  • Likes Given: 1893
Imagery from Sentinel-2 taken at 2020-08-23 16:05:33 UTC shows progress at Firefly's SLC-20.
With a gif comparing it to the last pass.


Offline Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23394
  • Liked: 1880
  • Likes Given: 1045
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1296086487159775235

Quote
Flight 1 payload section (foreground) and stage 1 (background) both undergoing flight acceptance testing.

Based on comparison imagery from 8-22 and 9-1 on Sentinel Infrared imagery, looks like they fired the stage.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33123
  • Likes Given: 8901
Based on comparison imagery from 8-22 and 9-1 on Sentinel Infrared imagery, looks like they fired the stage.

Other than cloud cover, I'm not seeing the change. Can you point it out?
« Last Edit: 09/06/2020 07:22 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Ronsmytheiii

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23394
  • Liked: 1880
  • Likes Given: 1045
Based on comparison imagery from 8-22 and 9-1 on Sentinel Infrared imagery, looks like they fired the stage.

Other than cloud cover, I'm not seeing the change. Can you point it out?

Its the discoloration here, that is North-ish of the test stand

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Its the discoloration here, that is North-ish of the test stand

Isn’t that a shadow from the cloud to the left, like the shadow in the bottom right of the image?

Also there’s a darker colour on nearly all sides of the test side (albeit more to the North)
« Last Edit: 09/06/2020 04:49 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Its the discoloration here, that is North-ish of the test stand

Isn’t that a shadow from the cloud to the left, like the shadow in the bottom right of the image?

Also there’s a darker colour on nearly all sides of the test side (albeit more to the North)

I've stood in many a field in Texas and watched the shadow of a little cloud move across it, and that's exactly what's happening there.

As an only vaguely related side note, I sometimes forget that the sun is literally brighter down here in Texas, and therefore the shadows are harsher than they are elsewhere in the country.
« Last Edit: 09/06/2020 05:51 pm by JEF_300 »
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

Offline novak

  • Member
  • Posts: 85
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 5
Based on comparison imagery from 8-22 and 9-1 on Sentinel Infrared imagery, looks like they fired the stage.

Other than cloud cover, I'm not seeing the change. Can you point it out?

Its the discoloration here, that is North-ish of the test stand

Actually, that's not even test stand 2.  These pictures are much better than the one with the fairing and stage for figuring out where in the satellite image TS-2 is.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D5HRLD1WAAAEE14?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DnppYYGVsAAB6E5?format=jpg&name=large
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/NSF-2019-06-06-15-03-43-796.jpg

I can see a clear change downstream of the flame diverter but it looks like it's only because the second image is much brighter (and maybe a car moving?).  I don't think you can tell if the stage was fired.





--
novak

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/fccspace/status/1303415331298320386

Quote
Applicant: Firefly Aerospace
Dates: 11/21/2020-12/21/2020
Purpose: The main purpose of the launch vehicle is to provide commercial space launch services(...)

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=102350

Quote
Please explain the purpose of operation:    The main purpose of the launch vehicle is to provide commercial space launch services. Once the launch vehicle reaches the mission altitude of 300km, it will deploy commercial payloads into orbit. The second stage will complete one full orbit while it downlinks data to VAFB and KSAT ground station locations in Hawaii, Mauritius, and South Africa.

Offline intelati

Quote
This STA is for a space launch vehicle. It has a shore mission duration of less than 2 hours.

Hmm.... Did they mean shore?

Now that I'm about to hit post, I'm questioning my mockery into a serious question..
Starships are meant to fly

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10435
  • US
  • Liked: 14349
  • Likes Given: 6148
Quote
This STA is for a space launch vehicle. It has a shore mission duration of less than 2 hours.

Hmm.... Did they mean shore?

Now that I'm about to hit post, I'm questioning my mockery into a serious question..

It was just a typo

Offline playadelmars

  • Member
  • Posts: 76
  • Liked: 60
  • Likes Given: 1
Some NASA grumpiness on Clips contract. Recommendation to change their contracting diligence process.

https://twitter.com/joroulette/status/1306247088066441217?s=21

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
OIG, not really NASA.

It's worth pointing out that NASA took a pretty big risk with the COTS contracts by awarding SpaceX and RocketPlane Kistler. Kistler failed, actually, and that's how we got Orbital/Cygnus. But without COTS, we almost certainly wouldn't have SpaceX today. Commercial contracting methods aren't just trying to save money on a contract but also trying to expand the marketplace of providers beyond just the usual players.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained. OIG doesn't seem to buy that argument, but NASA apparently does.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline TrevorMonty

Just because aerospace company can afford project doesn't mean they wont walk away from it eg Boeing XS-1. Small new space companies tend to be 100% committed to these NASA projects.


 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0