Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 7, 2017 : DISCUSSION  (Read 251076 times)

Offline Coastal Ron

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8967
  • I live... along the coast
  • Liked: 10330
  • Likes Given: 12053
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #360 on: 09/08/2017 03:12 pm »
They looked liked the old aluminum grid fins to me while watching deployment during the landing sequence and left me raising my brow thus-sly ala Spock ???

The new grid fins don't have the two stringers running along them - the ones for OTV-5 did have the stringers.

Unless these are titanium fins cast to the same pattern as the 1st generation fins, they're aluminium.

The new titanium ones also have scalloped edges, and these were flat. Also, the new one ones deploy slower, are larger, and are not painted white.
If we don't continuously lower the cost to access space, how are we ever going to afford to expand humanity out into space?

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #361 on: 09/08/2017 03:33 pm »
The fact that all we have to talk about is how the host misspoke=flawless mission... Gets another attaboy SpaceX from me! :)
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline rockets4life97

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 800
  • Liked: 538
  • Likes Given: 367
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #362 on: 09/08/2017 03:43 pm »
I expect we'll be seeing the "old" gridfins on RTLS missions for some time. I expect they have a stockpile and are willing to do some slight refurbishment on used ones as this is likely more cost effective then throwing them away (in favor of the titanium ones on all missions).

Offline macpacheco

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
  • Vitoria-ES-Brazil
  • Liked: 368
  • Likes Given: 3041
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #363 on: 09/08/2017 03:51 pm »
I expect we'll be seeing the "old" gridfins on RTLS missions for some time. I expect they have a stockpile and are willing to do some slight refurbishment on used ones as this is likely more cost effective then throwing them away (in favor of the titanium ones on all missions).
IF Al Grid Fins need refurb at all from LEO missions ! Just because they do need refurb on higher energy missions does NOT mean any refurb at all is needed on all missions.
Looking for companies doing great things for much more than money

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14181
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #364 on: 09/08/2017 04:35 pm »
The next launch of the X-37B OTV-6 is slated for a 2019 launch on the Atlas V.

Quote
At least one more X-37B flight, OTV-6, is on the books for liftoff on an Atlas 5 rocket in 2019 on the so-called Air Force Space Command-7 launch.

Source link below.

https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/09/07/spacex-beats-hurricane-with-smooth-launch-of-militarys-x-37b-spaceplane/
« Last Edit: 09/08/2017 04:38 pm by Star One »

Offline Archibald

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2611
  • Liked: 500
  • Likes Given: 1096
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #365 on: 09/08/2017 06:13 pm »
Congrats to SpaceX. Both first stage and X-37 are reusable. With the fairing soon to be reused.

Now only the second stage is expendable.  ;)
Han shot first and Gwynne Shotwell !

Offline HVM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 759
  • Finland
  • Liked: 1212
  • Likes Given: 616
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #366 on: 09/08/2017 06:27 pm »
Any word if SpX had time to secure B1040.1?

Offline octavo

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
  • Liked: 186
  • Likes Given: 740
« Last Edit: 09/08/2017 06:50 pm by octavo »

Offline rockets4life97

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 800
  • Liked: 538
  • Likes Given: 367
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #368 on: 09/08/2017 07:40 pm »
Any word if SpX had time to secure B1040.1?
L2

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=43611.msg1720877.msg#1720877

Take that as a yes. If SpaceX didn't, it would be news worthy and likely find its way into an article on the main site.

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #369 on: 09/08/2017 07:45 pm »
Any word if SpX had time to secure B1040.1?
L2

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=43611.msg1720877.msg#1720877

Take that as a yes. If SpaceX didn't, it would be news worthy and likely find its way into an article on the main site.

That post said they're working on it, we haven't had anything posted yet saying they're complete.

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #370 on: 09/08/2017 08:17 pm »
Superb news that it's lifted off.
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline Coastal Ron

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8967
  • I live... along the coast
  • Liked: 10330
  • Likes Given: 12053
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #371 on: 09/08/2017 09:19 pm »
This story says that SpaceX "was moving quickly to secure" the first stage. 
http://spacenews.com/cape-canaveral-facilities-prepare-for-hurricane-irma/
My guess is that means lifting it onto the work stand.  I don't see how they could do more. I could be wrong.

They are trying to get the core inside a building before the storm. We'll see if they can do it, otherwise I would imagine they have a plan for lashing it down in some way.
If we don't continuously lower the cost to access space, how are we ever going to afford to expand humanity out into space?

Online kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #372 on: 09/08/2017 09:41 pm »
They are trying to get the core inside a building before the storm. We'll see if they can do it, otherwise I would imagine they have a plan for lashing it down in some way.
Half fill the RP-1 tank with water?
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline Herb Schaltegger

They are trying to get the core inside a building before the storm. We'll see if they can do it, otherwise I would imagine they have a plan for lashing it down in some way.
Half fill the RP-1 tank with water?

I'd set it onto the booster mount, use the lifting beanie cap the crane uses and guy wires bolted to the surrounding concrete. I wonder if the current stand was designed with this in mind? If so, there could be recessed padeyes set into the concrete already.
« Last Edit: 09/08/2017 09:55 pm by Herb Schaltegger »
Ad astra per aspirin ...

Offline rocketguy101

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 869
    • Strib's Rocket Page
  • Liked: 247
  • Likes Given: 903
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #374 on: 09/09/2017 05:19 am »
The thought just struck me: it is strange to see discussion about securing a rocket booster after it landed before a hurricane hits the area when a few years ago it would be at the bottom of the Atlantic and nobody would give it a second thought...wow!  8)

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #375 on: 09/09/2017 09:40 am »
Half fill the RP-1 tank with water?
Neat idea.

But I think those legs are designed to cope with landing a near empty stage, not anything close to full weight.  :(

Best to get inside a building ASAP.
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline topopesto

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 167
  • Liked: 54
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #376 on: 09/09/2017 10:49 am »
Is state to recover the fairing in this mission?

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #377 on: 09/09/2017 11:25 am »
Super-smooth launch and landing, top work by SpaceX and great commentary here at NSF, for which thanks.

The grid fins (which I want to call feathers) seemed to be making light work of steering; gentle adjustment rather than big rotations, which is how you want it. Maybe the first two burns did a good enough job of putting everything on target.
SX have talked about improving the flight software to get a narrower dispersion on the landing angles, but I think that's meant to be part of the Block 5 upgrade.

This sounds very academic but it's got huge payoffs if they can do this every time.

More controlled thermal environment means less TPS erosion.

Less landing propellant for for landing process

Possibly less mass for the grid fin power package.

Bottom line. More mass to the US for either propellant or payload.

The later nudges up the payload figure a bit more, although it already exceeds the payload to LEO of every Atlas V variant that has flown so far (until the double engine centaur variant flies) and the straight Delta IV Medium to LEO.

Leaving the US payload the same and increasing the propellant load gives you more scope for escape missions or any US recovery attempts.

MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline Herb Schaltegger

Half fill the RP-1 tank with water?
Neat idea.

But I think those legs are designed to cope with landing a near empty stage, not anything close to full weight.  :(

The first thing they do is set it on the booster mount to remove the legs. We're discussing options *IF* there should be a situation with insufficient time to remove the legs, get it on the transporter and back to a hanger. In such a case, a ballasted stage isn't a bad idea, but you might not want to fill with water in a structure not meant to hold it. You'd have to carefully clean and dry the tanks and plumbing to remove water before reuse.

I still think guy wires tied off to the beanie cap 90 or 120 degrees around the booster mount is a viable approach to this kind of contingency.
Ad astra per aspirin ...

Offline cscott

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Liked: 2869
  • Likes Given: 726
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : X-37B OTV-5 : September 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #379 on: 09/09/2017 12:56 pm »
Is state to recover the fairing in this mission?
The Go Quest/Go Searcher support ships did not leave port, according to our ASDS tracking thread, and are currently tied up further inland than usual to ride out the storm.  So very unlikely there was any fairing recovery attempt, as I believe the Go * ships need to be over the horizon to collect fairing telemetry for even unsuccessful or "water landing" attempts.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0