Author Topic: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion  (Read 401584 times)

Online archae86

  • Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Albuquerque, NM, USA
  • Liked: 5
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #680 on: 12/30/2017 07:53 PM »
Larger versions
In the post (on the update thread) I'm referencing, the posted image of the 27-Merlin business end (FH-mated3.jpg) has four curious objects, a pair between each side booster and the main.  A colleague on another forum speculated that they might be damping devices, and I speculate they might be actuators in the separation system.  I've cropped a closeup from the cited photo and am attaching it as FH_Whazzat_0.jpg. 

Does anyone know what they are, or care to guess?
« Last Edit: 12/30/2017 08:11 PM by Chris Bergin »

Larger versions
In the post (on the update thread) I'm referencing, the posted image of the 27-Merlin business end (FH-mated3.jpg) has four curious objects, a pair between each side booster and the main.  A colleague on another forum speculated that they might be damping devices, and I speculate they might be actuators in the separation system.  I've cropped a closeup from the cited photo and am attaching it as FH_Whazzat_0.jpg. 

Does anyone know what they are, or care to guess?

[GUESS]

I'd guess it's a pusher, while the other attachment points just hold it in place. Once they let go these would push the booster away.

[/GUESS]
Proud creator of Ian's Paper Model Rocket Collection:
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=42383.0

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7896
  • N. California
  • Liked: 4145
  • Likes Given: 843
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #682 on: 12/30/2017 08:37 PM »



I think launches are addictive. The more we get, the more we want.

There will be a saturation point when the Starlink build-up goes into full swing.

If you're near SFO, look up the Elephant Bar, located on the shoreline in line with the threshold for runway 28, and watch them land in pairs as you get the Seared Ahi-Tuna and a Jack Daniels.

If THAT doesn't get old, I can't see how a few launches per day would.  :)
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31504
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 9869
  • Likes Given: 307
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #683 on: 12/30/2017 08:56 PM »
So...let me get this strait.  We have the most eagerly-awaited rocket roll-out in decades, and all we get are long-distance shots and no up-close hi-res's from SpaceX?

Not decades.  There were many others, just not hyped

Offline old_sellsword

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 628
  • Liked: 529
  • Likes Given: 452
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #684 on: 12/30/2017 09:11 PM »
Larger versions
In the post (on the update thread) I'm referencing, the posted image of the 27-Merlin business end (FH-mated3.jpg) has four curious objects, a pair between each side booster and the main.  A colleague on another forum speculated that they might be damping devices, and I speculate they might be actuators in the separation system.  I've cropped a closeup from the cited photo and am attaching it as FH_Whazzat_0.jpg. 

Does anyone know what they are, or care to guess?

They are the pneumatic pusher mechanisms. Two for each boosterís octaweb.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31504
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 9869
  • Likes Given: 307
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #685 on: 12/30/2017 09:14 PM »
Larger versions
In the post (on the update thread) I'm referencing, the posted image of the 27-Merlin business end (FH-mated3.jpg) has four curious objects, a pair between each side booster and the main.  A colleague on another forum speculated that they might be damping devices, and I speculate they might be actuators in the separation system.  I've cropped a closeup from the cited photo and am attaching it as FH_Whazzat_0.jpg. 

Does anyone know what they are, or care to guess?

not dampers.  no need for such.  It is the sep system

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4012
  • Liked: 1342
  • Likes Given: 1088
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #686 on: 12/30/2017 09:26 PM »
I know I am not going to make any friends by saying this but it needs to be said.

I would majorly hate to be a member of the generation that just can't stand to wait until it [whatever "it" may be] actually happens. I get the impression that they would never be able to stand the wait time of several YEARS while a probe makes its way to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto or the Ort cloud. Their heads would explode. Try launching a probe like that knowing that you yourself may very well not live long enough to see it arrive and that children who are in 4th grade at launch date would likely be the scientists that would monitor and record the arrival. Do you have the patience for that?

Jeepers people. The solar system isn't your back yard that can be crossed in a leap and a bound.
SpaceX will provide photographs when it wants to and not one second before - they don't owe any of us a thing.
Falcon Heavy will launch when it is ready. - Give it a rest and have a cup of tea or coffee or latte-mocha-chi-whatever.
Chill. It will happen when it happens.
THIS site will be the first to let you know it's happening so just stay tuned and quit complaining.

Bah!
I DID wait through the 9.5 year journey to Pluto (Having worked on the mission)
One of my personal efforts has been in the works for twenty years, and it can't really yet be said to be a going concern.
But I want MORE PROGRESS.
I still remember the rapid progress of the "Space Race".
FASTER!
Fly that Heavy, already!

There.  I said it.  Now back to waiting.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Online cscott

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2638
  • Liked: 1843
  • Likes Given: 658
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #687 on: 12/30/2017 10:07 PM »


Yeah, judging from some coincidentally accurate porkchop plots and a few articles, Roadster can certainly make it to a rather close encounter with Mars, it just might take anywhere from a 12-24 month coast period to get there.

What's with the asymptote in that porkchop plot?  It seems like the required dV around Jan 15 is actually extremely sensitive to the exact date selected.  Is that just an artifact of some other choice made in the plot, or is there an actual orbital mechanics reason why Jan 15 would be so much worse than Jan 1?
I found the answer to my own question:
http://hopsblog-hop.blogspot.com/2013/01/deboning-porkchop-plot.html

So we're rapidly approaching the time period where an expensive 180 degree phase change is necessary to intercept Mars.  Unless SpaceX is willing to wait until late February, they are going to have to do a mid-course burn to do the necessary inclination change to intercept Mars.

This might have been a factor in SpaceX's desire to get the first FH launch off in December. Given that they don't seem like they're going to wait 50 days to launch it --- does that imply that the S2 can do a second inclination-change burn after a hundred days of loiter?  Or is there some other clever way to intercept Mars (a transfer that doesn't take 180 degrees of anomaly, for instance)?

Offline mme

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1095
  • Santa Barbara, CA, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Virgo Supercluster
  • Liked: 1323
  • Likes Given: 3461
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #688 on: 12/30/2017 10:18 PM »


Yeah, judging from some coincidentally accurate porkchop plots and a few articles, Roadster can certainly make it to a rather close encounter with Mars, it just might take anywhere from a 12-24 month coast period to get there.

What's with the asymptote in that porkchop plot?  It seems like the required dV around Jan 15 is actually extremely sensitive to the exact date selected.  Is that just an artifact of some other choice made in the plot, or is there an actual orbital mechanics reason why Jan 15 would be so much worse than Jan 1?
I found the answer to my own question:
http://hopsblog-hop.blogspot.com/2013/01/deboning-porkchop-plot.html

So we're rapidly approaching the time period where an expensive 180 degree phase change is necessary to intercept Mars.  Unless SpaceX is willing to wait until late February, they are going to have to do a mid-course burn to do the necessary inclination change to intercept Mars.

This might have been a factor in SpaceX's desire to get the first FH launch off in December. Given that they don't seem like they're going to wait 50 days to launch it --- does that imply that the S2 can do a second inclination-change burn after a hundred days of loiter?  Or is there some other clever way to intercept Mars (a transfer that doesn't take 180 degrees of anomaly, for instance)?
The Roadster is not going to Mars.  Itís going to orbit around the sun with its aphelion being about the same as Marsí orbit.
Space is not Highlander.  There can, and will, be more than one.

Offline rpapo

  • Cybernetic Mole
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Michigan, USA
  • Liked: 490
  • Likes Given: 406
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #689 on: 12/30/2017 10:26 PM »
So we're rapidly approaching the time period where an expensive 180 degree phase change is necessary to intercept Mars.
Weren't we told that this would be a launch to a Mars transfer orbit equivalent, not the real thing?  In such a case, all they are trying to do is launch to an orbit which will have as its apogee the orbit of Mars, and the perigee somewhere around the Earth.  In such a case, "porkchop" plots are meaningless.
An Apollo fanboy . . . fifty years ago.

Offline Herb Schaltegger


Bah!
I DID wait through the 9.5 year journey to Pluto (Having worked on the mission)
One of my personal efforts has been in the works for twenty years, and it can't really yet be said to be a going concern.
But I want MORE PROGRESS.
I still remember the rapid progress of the "Space Race".
FASTER!
Fly that Heavy, already!

There.  I said it.  Now back to waiting.

I can relate. Some of the hardware I spec'd and other stuff I actually designed as a baby engineer 27 years ago still gets mention in the L2 ISS Daily Status Reports thread every few weeks. Does my crusty old heart good, it does. Wish it'd all been replaced by a moonbase or mission to Mars by now but ...

Anyway, if this thing manages to launch next month without an Earth-shattering kaboom, I'll be that much closer to someone, ANYONE, sending people to Mars than I've ever personally been in my lifetime. :)
« Last Edit: 12/31/2017 01:21 AM by Herb Schaltegger »
Ad astra per aspirin ...

Online Space Ghost 1962

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
  • Whatcha gonna do when the Ghost zaps you?
  • Liked: 2537
  • Likes Given: 1911
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #691 on: 12/31/2017 12:18 AM »
So FH spent less than a day at the pad doing fit checks.
Fit checks are short. No obvious issue present. If they were to repeat the rollout, then there may have been an issue. Looks fine.

I think the probability of success is pretty high, but not as high as a F9 of course.
I think 50-50 is about right.  That's what Elon suggested, if I recall correctly.
Your usual measure of success as the qualifier of the "50=50"?

Quote
The first Delta 4 Heavy failed...
Successful launch. Mission failure due to under performance (booster, US couldn't make up within margins).

It made it to a lower orbit due to a performance shortfall (main engine early shutdown was triggered by an empty tank signal from the fuel sensor during the first stage due to cavitation around the propellant feed). Unforeseen issue.

...

Thanks for explanation, but I'm still stumped by the 1 vs 3 core?

Whatever torque issues are on one core they have obviously solved, so what happens when you have 3 cores side by side? as I said in my question: why is it a larger problem and not the same problem 3 times (with the same solution applied 3 times)?
If you watch the the liftoff of the first Falcon 9, it clearly rotates.  For a single stick, that's not really a big deal.  But now bolt three of them together and rather than rotate freely in space they will be torquing the connections.



The issue they are worried about is during ignition, not during flight.

(and we've seen many launches since then, I don't think they have a problem here)
The issue is the vehicle ensemble, not ignition.

Static fire includes assessing vehicle performance briefly while still on the launch mount.  It won't be released if anomalous on launch.

The gimbal of the engines is fully capable of eliminating or inducing any roll wanted or unwanted.
For each core. The concern is the ensemble acting unpredictably.

After release, your concern is clearing the pad/TE/tower/facility. Sufficient performance and control.

I'm not concerned by any flight control guidance authority issues, just potential pneumatics and unlatch hangs at  booster sep...
That's late in flight. Before that you'll have structural issues to contend with, as well as guidance.

Vehicle stability pre/post sep is as important as sep event itself.

Due to thrust torque (a thrust-induced rotation)...

I believe the torque mentioned is around a horizontal axis. A single stick might use an asymmetric engine ignition sequence without overstressing its own octaweb. But placed side by side, the asymmetric startup thrusts could overstress one or both webs. Now think of that happening on both sides of the center booster web simultaneously... complex.

I thought the problem would actually be in any mismatch in the overall thrust startup of the two side boosters, which could result (say) in the links on one side of the center booster being lift-loaded before the other. Could cause a center tube or link failure, I would imagine. Fireball.
Three axial, elastic cylinders each with roll/pitch/yaw and coupling. Also TO which is unpredictable with resonance in the ensemble.

Much of this has been well simulated so unlikely a fireball. More likely is stability/performance issues where the vehicle does not perform adequately, possibly to the point of RSO/AFTS termination, if the GNC can't handle it.

add:
Almost forgot - DIVH first flew 12/21/2004, so also at the turn of the year 13 years ago.


« Last Edit: 12/31/2017 01:52 AM by Space Ghost 1962 »

Offline LouScheffer

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1585
  • Liked: 1823
  • Likes Given: 203
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #692 on: 12/31/2017 12:58 AM »
If they truly think that FH only has a 50% chance of succeeding, they are not going to launch. Period. They are going to want to be a lot more confident than that.

I don't agree.  I'm not sure it's possible to get more than 50% confident.

Of course, SpaceX will have addressed 100% of the problems that they have thought of.   But so has every other rocket maker, and historically about 50% of the first try of a new rocket have failed (see Rocketlab for the most recent example...).

So Musk might well believe, that after addressing every problem they know about, there is still a 50% chance of failure.  And there is nothing they can do about this, since they have already addressed every problem they could imagine.   The only way to proceed is to launch and let nature have a go at seeing what SpaceX could not.

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7896
  • N. California
  • Liked: 4145
  • Likes Given: 843
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #693 on: 12/31/2017 03:02 AM »
If they truly think that FH only has a 50% chance of succeeding, they are not going to launch. Period. They are going to want to be a lot more confident than that.

I don't agree.  I'm not sure it's possible to get more than 50% confident.

Of course, SpaceX will have addressed 100% of the problems that they have thought of.   But so has every other rocket maker, and historically about 50% of the first try of a new rocket have failed (see Rocketlab for the most recent example...).

So Musk might well believe, that after addressing every problem they know about, there is still a 50% chance of failure.  And there is nothing they can do about this, since they have already addressed every problem they could imagine.   The only way to proceed is to launch and let nature have a go at seeing what SpaceX could not.
Yup. Musk hasn't forgotten F1, or the two F9 failures.  I don't know how he got through 18 launches this year w/o a heart attack.
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline dorkmo

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 664
  • Liked: 298
  • Likes Given: 792
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #694 on: 12/31/2017 04:39 AM »
Larger versions
In the post (on the update thread) I'm referencing, the posted image of the 27-Merlin business end (FH-mated3.jpg) has four curious objects, a pair between each side booster and the main.  A colleague on another forum speculated that they might be damping devices, and I speculate they might be actuators in the separation system.  I've cropped a closeup from the cited photo and am attaching it as FH_Whazzat_0.jpg. 

Does anyone know what they are, or care to guess?

id guess the left side is the release mechanism. The right cylinder might be a dampener.

interesting white dots. Might be used to record video of dampener movement?

Online wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2765
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 568
  • Likes Given: 970
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #695 on: 12/31/2017 04:42 AM »
I see very little (if any) risk for POGO for FH, since they are flying the same stages as F9. Same engines, same tank lengths. POGO - if present - will show up in early launches.

All this talk of possible failure points - one more dramatic than the next - starts to border on concern trolling, IMO. ďSurely SpaceX has not thought of *this*?Ē

Agreed, lots of smart people, with hands on experience doing very hard things have done tons of work on this.

I think it will work fine, but if something gets it, itís not likely something like structural analysis not being thorough enough.
Excited to be finally into the first Falcon Heavy flow, we are getting so close!

Offline ChrisC

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Liked: 274
  • Likes Given: 294
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #696 on: 12/31/2017 04:51 AM »
I love Elon's remark (about a year ago) that if Falcon Heavy just lifts off and clears the LC-39A launchpad, he'll consider the test a success.  Certainly it would be a Bad Day for all involved to lose LC-39A.

Has anyone done the math for at what point during flight, if the whole stack breaks up, will the ballistics carry the debris back down to earth CLEAR of the launch complex?  (i.e. NOT do what Antares did to Wallops Pad 0 in Oct 2014)  Obviously this moment would be after the pitchover starts.

The simplest calc would be to just treat the whole stack as a point mass and then run that back down to ground -- i.e. just watch the instantaneous impact point (IIP) and wait for it to clear the fenceline, plus whatever distance is appropriate for the impact fireball.  The harder calc would be assuming that the stack detonates, and now you've got a debris cloud that's raining down, including some that was propelled BACK to the west.  So how much further would it need to be out for the propelled debris to also clear?

My guess is it's around 30 seconds, give or take 10 seconds.  That's the moment on the mission clock that I'll be watching for ...

Sorry to be macabre.  It's what engineers do, anticipate everything that can go wrong, right?
« Last Edit: 12/31/2017 04:54 AM by ChrisC »
How to embed photos from outside sources (e.g. Twitter)
NASA TV in HD:  history and FAQ (from 2007-2010 startup period)

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7896
  • N. California
  • Liked: 4145
  • Likes Given: 843
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #697 on: 12/31/2017 05:53 AM »
I love Elon's remark (about a year ago) that if Falcon Heavy just lifts off and clears the LC-39A launchpad, he'll consider the test a success.  Certainly it would be a Bad Day for all involved to lose LC-39A.

Has anyone done the math for at what point during flight, if the whole stack breaks up, will the ballistics carry the debris back down to earth CLEAR of the launch complex?  (i.e. NOT do what Antares did to Wallops Pad 0 in Oct 2014)  Obviously this moment would be after the pitchover starts.

The simplest calc would be to just treat the whole stack as a point mass and then run that back down to ground -- i.e. just watch the instantaneous impact point (IIP) and wait for it to clear the fenceline, plus whatever distance is appropriate for the impact fireball.  The harder calc would be assuming that the stack detonates, and now you've got a debris cloud that's raining down, including some that was propelled BACK to the west.  So how much further would it need to be out for the propelled debris to also clear?

My guess is it's around 30 seconds, give or take 10 seconds.  That's the moment on the mission clock that I'll be watching for ...

Sorry to be macabre.  It's what engineers do, anticipate everything that can go wrong, right?
I think the main damage is the unburned fuel.

The kinetics of the rocket structure coming back down can't be that destructive.

Going back to that Delta II, the pieces of the solids were I think mostly acting as incindiaries.

ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Online kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
  • Dublin/London
  • Liked: 250
  • Likes Given: 321
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #698 on: 12/31/2017 07:31 AM »
Not sure about the timing but I'll be holding my breath until it clears away from the pad. Would hate to damage/destroy all that. For me that's about 10/15 seconds and anything after that should be over the ocean.

...
My guess is it's around 30 seconds, give or take 10 seconds.  That's the moment on the mission clock that I'll be watching for ...

Sorry to be macabre.  It's what engineers do, anticipate everything that can go wrong, right?

Online john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6412
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 870
  • Likes Given: 5517
Re: SpaceX FH : Falcon Heavy Demo : early 2018 : Discussion
« Reply #699 on: 12/31/2017 07:34 AM »

I don't agree.  I'm not sure it's possible to get more than 50% confident.

Of course, SpaceX will have addressed 100% of the problems that they have thought of.   But so has every other rocket maker, and historically about 50% of the first try of a new rocket have failed (see Rocketlab for the most recent example...).

So Musk might well believe, that after addressing every problem they know about, there is still a 50% chance of failure.  And there is nothing they can do about this, since they have already addressed every problem they could imagine.   The only way to proceed is to launch and let nature have a go at seeing what SpaceX could not.
Bayesian statistics also look at the history of successful (or unsuccessful) "trials."

Obviously FH <> F9 but the question is how much different is it? The F9 has had a pretty successful year and the launch crew has had plenty of practice. The boosters are flight proven so the big unknowns are the core and the interactions between the cores and the whole assembly with the launch pad during launch.

I'd suggest that puts confidence > 50%. How  much above 50% is of course debatable.
"Solids are a branch of fireworks, not rocketry. :-) :-) ", Henry Spencer 1/28/11  Averse to bold? You must be in marketing."It's all in the sequencing" K. Mattingly.  STS-Keeping most of the stakeholders happy most of the time.
So you're going to Mars to seek a better life. What does that mean to you? Always spot a fanbois by how they react to their idols failures.

Tags: