Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 : PAZ & Microsat 2a/2b : SLC-4E : Feb 22, 2018 : DISCUSSION  (Read 207689 times)

Offline whitelancer64

She looks quite cheeky floating there; "I don't need no net!"

Wonder if is in good enough shape that they could consider reusing it if they can fish it out safely onto the recovery boat.  Is salt water bad on composites?

I guess we don't even know if they can get it on the boat though...

Saltwater is bad for just about everything. That said, I'd be more worried about the electronics, insulation, etc. inside the fairing than the exterior of the fairing.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline sevenperforce

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
  • Liked: 969
  • Likes Given: 599
did they water land the S1?

Stage 1 was jettison only, no legs, fins (but not deployed), no post sep burns, and no vessel postured to go to the impact location.  Pretty much like a "traditional" expendable mission.
What makes you think the fins weren't deployed? Wouldn't they deploy them, if they had them, to get hot-entry testing if nothing else?

Or was it just a case of "this rocket is sooty and we aren't reusing it and we won't reuse the grid fins either so why bother taking them off"?

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
Elon Musk ✔ @elonmusk
Tintin A & B will attempt to beam "hello world" in about 22 hours when they pass near LA
>
Elon Musk ✔ @elonmusk
Don't tell anyone, but the wifi password is "martians"
11:11 AM - Feb 22, 2018

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/966706924124188672
DM

Online LouScheffer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3452
  • Liked: 6263
  • Likes Given: 882
did they water land the S1?

Stage 1 was jettison only, no legs, fins (but not deployed), no post sep burns, and no vessel postured to go to the impact location.  Pretty much like a "traditional" expendable mission.
The staging was very slow, at 6725 km/hr, or 1868 m/s.   This is way under the values that have been used on boosters that were recovered (2300 m/s or thereabouts).  They could do this since the payload is light and the target is LEO, so the second stage can easily make up the difference.

On one hand, I'm surprised they did not driver the booster closer to depletion.  This would seem to maximize their margins.  On the other hand, by staging low and slow they might maximize their odds of fairing recovery.

My guess is that the margins are already so huge that increasing them makes little sense.  So instead they optimized for fairing recovery.

Offline jaredgalen

  • Member
  • Posts: 56
  • Liked: 8
  • Likes Given: 1
Would they delay chute opening on one fairing so it reaches the ship first, giving themselves time to reposition and catch the seconds half?

Or what is the approach for catching both halves....?

Online litton4

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 640
  • Liked: 436
  • Likes Given: 151
A second ship, once they nail the technique.......
Dave Condliffe

Offline AncientU

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6257
  • Liked: 4164
  • Likes Given: 6078
Would they delay chute opening on one fairing so it reaches the ship first, giving themselves time to reposition and catch the seconds half?

Or what is the approach for catching both halves....?

Catch the first half, repeat.
"If we shared everything [we are working on] people would think we are insane!"
-- SpaceX friend of mlindner

Online Llian Rhydderch

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1237
  • Terran Anglosphere
  • Liked: 1299
  • Likes Given: 9687
The non-recovery of the booster seems most likely, to me anyway, related to it is simply not worth it:  the cost of recovering "yet another" booster (legs, ASDS deployed, etc.) is simply not worth the benefit of recovering one more Block 3 F9 that they will never fly again.

Onward to Block 4 only, in new and reflights.  And soon, to Block 5 only.
« Last Edit: 02/22/2018 03:52 pm by Llian Rhydderch »
Re arguments from authority on NSF:  "no one is exempt from error, and errors of authority are usually the worst kind.  Taking your word for things without question is no different than a bracket design not being tested because the designer was an old hand."
"You would actually save yourself time and effort if you were to use evidence and logic to make your points instead of wrapping yourself in the royal mantle of authority.  The approach only works on sheep, not inquisitive, intelligent people."

Offline hootowls

  • Member
  • Posts: 59
  • Liked: 39
  • Likes Given: 1
did they water land the S1?

Stage 1 was jettison only, no legs, fins (but not deployed), no post sep burns, and no vessel postured to go to the impact location.  Pretty much like a "traditional" expendable mission.
What makes you think the fins weren't deployed? Wouldn't they deploy them, if they had them, to get hot-entry testing if nothing else?

Or was it just a case of "this rocket is sooty and we aren't reusing it and we won't reuse the grid fins either so why bother taking them off"?

I'm stating facts.  Not touching intent. 
« Last Edit: 02/22/2018 03:54 pm by hootowls »

Offline sevenperforce

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
  • Liked: 969
  • Likes Given: 599
What makes you think the fins weren't deployed? Wouldn't they deploy them, if they had them, to get hot-entry testing if nothing else?

Or was it just a case of "this rocket is sooty and we aren't reusing it and we won't reuse the grid fins either so why bother taking them off"?

I'm stating facts.  Not touching intent.
Did the webcast say they weren't going to deploy the fins?

Offline speedevil

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4406
  • Fife
  • Liked: 2762
  • Likes Given: 3369
Did the webcast say they weren't going to deploy the fins?

I did not hear that, and was listening for it.
They specifically said no burns. No mention I heard of fins.

Offline John Alan

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 958
  • Central IL - USA - Earth
    • Home of the ThreadRipper Cadillac
  • Liked: 721
  • Likes Given: 2735
They likely put grid fins on to make sure they are not hit by the fairing when it was deployed...
Checking that it misses them on the way by at speed, in other words...
Would not surprise me that was the reason they went along for the ride... IMHO...  ;)
« Last Edit: 02/22/2018 04:01 pm by John Alan »

Offline JonathanD

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Liked: 873
  • Likes Given: 277
I'd love to see the video footage from that recovered fairing!

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
I'd love to see the video footage from that recovered fairing!

I've no doubt that a video will appear in due course to some suitable background music.
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14181
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Good deployment of PAZ Congrats SpaceX

Bit early secondary payloads not confirmed deployed yet?

I wouldn't expect much news.  I suspect they are going to continue being low key on anything about Starlink until they are much farther along.

Clearly I don't know what I'm talking about

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/966703261699854336

Quote
First two Starlink demo satellites, called Tintin A & B, deployed and communicating to Earth stations

Well clearly nor do I.

That fairing bobbing about on the surface of the ocean looks like a giant coracle.
« Last Edit: 02/22/2018 04:32 pm by Star One »

Offline jebbo

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 946
  • Cambridge, UK
  • Liked: 613
  • Likes Given: 309
That fairing bobbing about on the surface of the ocean looks like a giant coracle.

It's riding high enough that I wonder if they need to bother actually catching the inactive half ... just parafoil onto the sea and pick it up.

--- Tony

Offline aero

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • 92129
  • Liked: 1146
  • Likes Given: 360
That fairing bobbing about on the surface of the ocean looks like a giant coracle.

It's riding high enough that I wonder if they need to bother actually catching the inactive half ... just parafoil onto the sea and pick it up.

--- Tony

Well, if they pick this one up and check it out, they should be able to determine the answer to that.

And if it got to wet then there might be ways to waterproof it for minor amounts of dunking. A floatation collar at the big end or a "not too massive" bulkhead at the big end would convert it to a boat. They'd still need to send a retrieval boat out to get it but fishing it out of the water should not be as difficult as catching it on the fly.
Retired, working interesting problems

Offline cscott

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Liked: 2869
  • Likes Given: 726
Here are a few still shots from Oxnard this morning.  Some nice plumes at staging and later on some steering jets on the fairings.  At 15 minutes before local sunrise, the sky was already bright enough to wash out an attempted time exposure.

That last photo seems to show both fairing halves manuveuring!

EDIT: Helodriver agrees:

Puffing jets could be seen from BOTH fairing halves, but more from one than the other.

« Last Edit: 02/22/2018 05:32 pm by cscott »

Offline robert_d

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 359
  • Liked: 72
  • Likes Given: 118
Well, if they pick this one up and check it out, they should be able to determine the answer to that.

And if it got to wet then there might be ways to waterproof it for minor amounts of dunking. A floatation collar at the big end or a "not too massive" bulkhead at the big end would convert it to a boat. They'd still need to send a retrieval boat out to get it but fishing it out of the water should not be as difficult as catching it on the fly.

Reply in the fairing recovery thread (discussion of speculative stuff should go there, I think.)

Offline John Alan

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 958
  • Central IL - USA - Earth
    • Home of the ThreadRipper Cadillac
  • Liked: 721
  • Likes Given: 2735
From update thread...
Quote
Germany's @DLR_de, which is managing early ops for Paz radar sat, said all good after separation from @SpaceX Falcon 9; ground station received telemetry 75 mins after liftoff.

https://twitter.com/pbdes/status/966738328207941632

NOW... with all birds reporting in... Congrats to all parties that make this look easy... well done...  8)

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0