-
#340
by
Chris Bergin
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:23
-
psloss - 8/9/2006 6:07 PM
Sounds like they got a new data point in terms of the system behavior.
Agreed. Personally I support this scrub. Not sure why some media are being pretty confortational, bar the fact that they had very good questions - to the point where it compares with some of the really dull questions we tend to see at JSC.
-
#341
by
spaceshuttle
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:24
-
this mission probably had the most scrubs, huh?
-
#342
by
Chris Bergin
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:26
-
spaceshuttle - 8/9/2006 6:11 PM
this mission probably had the most scrubs, huh?
Not by a long shot!
-
#343
by
spaceshuttle
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:27
-
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 12:13 PM
spaceshuttle - 8/9/2006 6:11 PM
this mission probably had the most scrubs, huh?
Not by a long shot!
oh, that's right. 73 has that record....WHOOPS!
-
#344
by
Chris Bergin
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:29
-
spaceshuttle - 8/9/2006 6:14 PM
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 12:13 PM
spaceshuttle - 8/9/2006 6:11 PM
this mission probably had the most scrubs, huh?
Not by a long shot!
oh, that's right. 73 has that record....WHOOPS!
I've got the feeling that you're counting delays etc. STS-115 has only suffered one late scrub...as in tanking had started.
-
#345
by
tgrundke
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:30
-
The reason the press is being so confrontational is because they've got supervisors telling them, "get me a damned story!"
Truth: there is no story. The MMT is merely following their own guidelines.
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 12:10 PM
psloss - 8/9/2006 6:07 PM
Sounds like they got a new data point in terms of the system behavior.
Agreed. Personally I support this scrub. Not sure why some media are being pretty confortational, bar the fact that they had very good questions - to the point where it compares with some of the really dull questions we tend to see at JSC.
-
#346
by
psloss
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:30
-
Interesting that they've instrumented OV-105 to collect more data on this when it goes into a tanking next year.
-
#347
by
psloss
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:34
-
Wow, I guess Seth is not a complete loss -- asked about the F3L Tyvek issue.
-
#348
by
DaveS
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:36
-
psloss - 8/9/2006 7:21 PM
Wow, I guess Seth is not a complete loss -- asked about the F3L Tyvek issue.
Yes. It was interesting that LeRoy asked about possibility of having RSS rolled around the vehicle to replace lost Tyvek cover for F3L. I thought that the schedule for a 24-turnaround didn't allow for that.
-
#349
by
psloss
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:41
-
DaveS - 8/9/2006 1:23 PM
psloss - 8/9/2006 7:21 PM
Wow, I guess Seth is not a complete loss -- asked about the F3L Tyvek issue.
Yes. It was interesting that LeRoy asked about possibility of having RSS rolled around the vehicle to replace lost Tyvek cover for F3L. I thought that the schedule for a 24-turnaround didn't allow for that.
I recall they did that to snag a lost "pip pin" that dropped onto the aft ET attach struts for STS-92 (10 October 2000 launch attempt into the next one)...the problem is that they may not get the RSS back before the rain starts...
Leroy Cain is saying he thinks it's not an insurmountable problem...
-
#350
by
Chris Bergin
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:48
-
Uh oh, Wayne Hale's underwear manifest is indeed in trouble
-
#351
by
triddirt
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:50
-
Chris, do we have a L2 document on the redundant systems for the WH UM?
-
#352
by
psloss
on 08 Sep, 2006 17:57
-
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 1:10 PM
Agreed. Personally I support this scrub. Not sure why some media are being pretty confortational, bar the fact that they had very good questions - to the point where it compares with some of the really dull questions we tend to see at JSC.
I think this management team -- or at least the management as composed with the folks in their current chairs -- is harder for us armchair folks to figure out. (IMO, the press is in this category.)
Slightly rephrased, it doesn't have anything to do with the judgment calls the program is making, it's that we can't figure them out, which appears to be disorienting...
That's my speculation on the press reaction...
-
#353
by
Chris Bergin
on 08 Sep, 2006 18:09
-
triddirt - 8/9/2006 6:37 PM
Chris, do we have a L2 document on the redundant systems for the WH UM?
Yes, in the Laundry 2 section
-
#354
by
astrobrian
on 08 Sep, 2006 18:40
-
Would WHUM be an official term now???
And how would you scrub those
-
#355
by
psklenar
on 08 Sep, 2006 18:41
-
triddirt - 8/9/2006 1:37 PM
Chris, do we have a L2 document on the redundant systems for the WH UM?
ummm ... for the education of those of us who are at work and can't see NASA TV, and who are not in the press or work at NASA ... coudl someone please tell me what this "Underwear Manifest" is!?
pat----
-
#356
by
astrobrian
on 08 Sep, 2006 18:47
-
Wayne Hale made a comment the other day about having enough clean articles of clothing to go through the entire launch window, Saturday was originally out of the window so his manifest is going to need a recharge hehe
-
#357
by
DaveS
on 08 Sep, 2006 19:25
-
Chris, could you check with your ET sources what the status of the ECO sensors are now that they have drained the ET?
If they all went "dry" when the ET was drained it would indicate that they do have a good set of sensors and that they can proceed with a launch tommorow if LH2 sensor#3 would fail "wet" again.
-
#358
by
TFGQ
on 08 Sep, 2006 19:30
-
i am sure Wayne can find a 24-hour Wal mart around there if need be
-
#359
by
Mark Nguyen
on 08 Sep, 2006 19:32
-
And has anyone heard anything on the fuel cell of late?
Mark
