-
#300
by
Chris Bergin
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:38
-
Ok, guests back in. Our webteam worked a solution.
-
#301
by
HKS
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:39
-
The LCC rules for tomorow say:
- If everything works like normal, launch
- If the same sensor fails WET, launch
- Else SCRUB and do trubleshooting (could be everything from swaping point sensor box to roll-back and de-stacking)
-
#302
by
elmarko
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:42
-
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 4:25 PM
Ok, guests back in. Our webteam worked a solution.
Was it "stop using IIS and get a Linux/Apache/PHP solution"?
*dons flameproof suit!*
-
#303
by
nathan.moeller
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:42
-
Glad they have that rationale already from STS-114s ECOS failure! Hopefully we'll see the same results for the second attempt!
-
#304
by
jacqmans
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:44
-
Will they put a cover back on the truster, since rain was forecast for the afternoon, and thunderstorms as well...
-
#305
by
nathan.moeller
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:46
-
jacqmans - 8/9/2006 10:31 AM
Will they put a cover back on the truster, since rain was forecast for the afternoon, and thunderstorms as well...
Doubt it...that would mean rolling the RSS back and forth from parking positions and could be big trouble for the schedule.
-
#306
by
HKS
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:53
-
elmarko - 8/9/2006 5:29 PM
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 4:25 PM
Ok, guests back in. Our webteam worked a solution.
Was it "stop using IIS and get a Linux/Apache/PHP solution"?
*dons flameproof suit!*
Looks like it was to turn of auto-loading of pictures attatched, and turn off avetars
-
#307
by
Chris Bergin
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:56
-
Some ET people are very happy NASA stuck to the LCC on the ECO sensors.
-
#308
by
Gary
on 08 Sep, 2006 15:59
-
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 4:43 PM
Some ET people are very happy NASA stuck to the LCC on the ECO sensors.
I can understand that but it seems to me they are not going to do any additional testing of the ECO sensors? Just re-tank and if the sensor fails 'WET' then it's all ok???
-
#309
by
nathan.moeller
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:02
-
Gary - 8/9/2006 10:46 AM
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 4:43 PM
Some ET people are very happy NASA stuck to the LCC on the ECO sensors.
I can understand that but it seems to me they are not going to do any additional testing of the ECO sensors? Just re-tank and if the sensor fails 'WET' then it's all ok???
Right. But it has to be the SAME sensor and it has to fail WET. Any other conditions will result in another scrub.
-
#310
by
jcopella
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:02
-
Chris Bergin - 8/9/2006 11:43 AM
Some ET people are very happy NASA stuck to the LCC on the ECO sensors.
As they should be. You sort out the LCC when you're calm and not under the pressure of launch day. Last time they had ECO funnies, they thought about this, and devised a procedure and criteria they wanted to apply if they saw it again, and developed rationale for getting comfortable flying with it, so that's what they're going to do. That's the way the system is supposed to work.
Hale is running this show pretty much by the numbers. Kudos to him. I want to see Bill Harwood tell him he has "Go Fever" today at the post-scrub presser.
-
#311
by
Avron
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:02
-
How many launches have been scrubed due to ECO sensors now...
-
#312
by
neo
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:04
-
Chris, Mark, Phillip, Dave, web-team (dșżșb), others overlooked...
My one-time feedback: I never imagined I'd find such a rich spaceflight resource online -- obviously I failed my own exploring for too long.
Kudos for flyin a steady ball so proficiently, efficiently and SO informatively -- and for keeping the flocks and (us «8ș) "VFR pilots" off your wing (first things first). Not only is NSF exemplary itself, it exemplifies the extraordinary "everyday" accomplishments of NASA and partners (no matter where it's rattling along that nauseating popularity roller-coaster).
Strapped in, visor down.
Salut,
JimB
"neo" (near earth, ..occasionally)
oșoșoșoșoșoșoșoșoșoșoșoșoșoșo
reach beyond
revive the vision
revisit the moon
rediscover ourselves
& drop by Mars on the way.
i'll leave a light on for ya.
-
#313
by
DaveS
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:08
-
Avron - 8/9/2006 5:49 PM
How many launches have been scrubed due to ECO sensors now...
2. 114 and now 115.
-
#314
by
HKS
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:08
-
Avron - 8/9/2006 5:49 PM
How many launches have been scrubed due to ECO sensors now...
Only this attempt and the first attempt by STS-114, so that's two...
They also had ECO problemes with ET-120 on STS-114 tanking test.
-
#315
by
nathan.moeller
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:09
-
Hopefully that sensor will give a good reading tomorrow like it did in July 2005. Kinda sad thinkin' that this tank had it's sensor swapped to avoid this!!
-
#316
by
hoorenz
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:11
-
Well, they put in the best they had from the batch. No guarantees.
-
#317
by
punkboi
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:11
-
Let's face it... Atlantis isn't meant to fly anytime before Fall... The machine is trying to tell us something...
-
#318
by
Zoomer30
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:12
-
How can a sensor fail one day and work the next day. I have never understood that about the ECO sensors. And who is to say a sensor is not going to fail during assent.
Just one more reason we need Orion, about the only scrub worry we will have with that ship is weather and perhaps something with the 2nd stage.
-
#319
by
uko
on 08 Sep, 2006 16:14
-
Any information, when the post-scrub briefing is due?
