Author Topic: SpaceX announcement (2/27/17) speculation thread  (Read 82100 times)

Online envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8166
  • Liked: 6836
  • Likes Given: 2972
Re: SpaceX announcement (2/27/17) speculation thread
« Reply #200 on: 02/27/2017 08:44 pm »
So what would be the flight profile? Orbit? What puts them into TLI?

Probably FH launch to a low Earth orbit for Dragon checkout, then the FH upper stage restarts to put them through TLI. Upper stage separates after TLI burn, and Dragon+trunk is on it's own after that.

Offline Space Ghost 1962

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2780
  • Whatcha gonna do when the Ghost zaps you?
  • Liked: 2926
  • Likes Given: 2247
Re: SpaceX announcement (2/27/17) speculation thread
« Reply #201 on: 02/27/2017 08:45 pm »
IT fits in with building a business case for going to Mars.

Remember, Musk says that going to Mars is to be "fun". Think of extreme sports.

So by doing this, yes, he takes space tourism to a new level, he increases the market cap, he demonstrates he owns the market, and has on the drawing board the end product.

Investors "get this". IT means he can finance ITS with significant global deep pockets.

Yes, a "big deal". 

Which Trump might want in on.

Offline geza

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 687
  • Budapest
    • Géza Meszéna's web page
  • Liked: 445
  • Likes Given: 76
Re: SpaceX announcement (2/27/17) speculation thread
« Reply #202 on: 02/27/2017 08:46 pm »
What has happened with the livestream?

Offline Kaputnik

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3091
  • Liked: 727
  • Likes Given: 840
Re: SpaceX announcement (2/27/17) speculation thread
« Reply #203 on: 02/27/2017 08:47 pm »
I presume the two paying customers are going to be the only people aboard? No SpaceX provided pilot?
"I don't care what anything was DESIGNED to do, I care about what it CAN do"- Gene Kranz

Offline gin455res

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 513
  • bristol, uk
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 74
Re: SpaceX announcement (2/27/17) speculation thread
« Reply #204 on: 02/27/2017 08:48 pm »
I'm a space cadet (not a troll) but someone put my mind at ease (with reason not sentiment) that this isn't just disgustingly decadent, but is an efficient (i.e. part of an incremental and sustainable) route to space settlement, please?


And might be good if the rationale is powerful enough to convince the much tougher (non space cadet) majority of the general public too.

Online Chris Bergin

Re: SpaceX announcement (2/27/17) speculation thread
« Reply #205 on: 02/27/2017 08:48 pm »
On to the main thread now. No more speculation is required now we know.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0