Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION  (Read 239626 times)

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #380 on: 06/09/2017 04:38 pm »
If it is not ice and it flew from the S2 dome forward though, I'd worry about damage to the external payloads.
If it fell out of the trunk onto the S2 dome, (then later floated forward) I would worry about the pointy part of the calipers  puncturing the LOX tank dome... That would be a very difficult fault tree to resolve.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline rockets4life97

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 800
  • Liked: 538
  • Likes Given: 367
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #381 on: 06/09/2017 04:44 pm »
If it is not ice and it flew from the S2 dome forward though, I'd worry about damage to the external payloads.

Shouldn't NASA's inspection of the external payloads prior to removal with the robotic arm reveal any damage? Since the payloads are being removed, it looks like SpaceX got away with a mistake.

Offline eeergo

Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #382 on: 06/09/2017 04:53 pm »
If it is not ice and it flew from the S2 dome forward though, I'd worry about damage to the external payloads.

Shouldn't NASA's inspection of the external payloads prior to removal with the robotic arm reveal any damage? Since the payloads are being removed, it looks like SpaceX got away with a mistake.

Damage need not be visible, and it appears to be coming from the underside of ROSA, which has not yet been removed. Unless the damage was very obvious, I don't see why they wouldn't go ahead with removal though, that's what checkouts are for: checking launch rigors haven't damaged anything.
-DaviD-

Offline Wolfram66

Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #383 on: 06/09/2017 04:55 pm »
2-S2 thrust stops and unrestraind object moves into Dragon trunk due to INERTIA.

This would only be true if an external force is applied to S2/trunk. Otherwise inertia applies equally to the whole system S2/dragon/caliper. For the caliper to move relative to S2/trunk it needs a separate force.
Are you saying, when you are in a car and hit the brakes, your movement forward is caused by a seperate force or when you go around a curve the force pushing you to the side is caused by a seperate force?

Please educate me on this non inertial force acting on you and the car separately.

Hitting the brakes is applying a force against inertia. SECO/MECO is switching from acceleration to cruising (e.g. NO external force).

NEWTON people. an object in motion will remain in motion if not acted upon by an external force.  caliper is accelerating at same rate as S2 +Dragon stack. 3 G's at the time suddenly acceleration stops ..SECO. an unrestrained object will drift forward, especially since there is a liquid sloshing around in the S2. This is different than 2 objects traveling a constant velocity.

Offline eeergo

Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #384 on: 06/09/2017 05:10 pm »
Further note: I won't enter the discussion of it being a caliper or not, but it seems weird for a piece of ice to drift off camera in that direction (being first obscured by the S2-Dragon interface ring) and, a few seconds later, *reappear* on the same trajectory and with the same shape, receding into the distance.

I am referring to T+10:34 to 10:40.
-DaviD-

Offline jpo234

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Liked: 2323
  • Likes Given: 2234
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #385 on: 06/09/2017 05:11 pm »
NEWTON people. an object in motion will remain in motion if not acted upon by an external force.  caliper is accelerating at same rate as S2 +Dragon stack. 3 G's at the time suddenly acceleration stops ..SECO. an unrestrained object will drift forward, especially since there is a liquid sloshing around in the S2. This is different than 2 objects traveling a constant velocity.

You fail to account for the fact that when the acceleration stops, everything in the system is an "unrestrained object". The hypothetical caliper drifts forward, but so do S2 and the dragon. For the caliper to get ahead of S2 and bounce into dragon, it needs to accelerate relative to S2 and dragon. To accelerate, it needs a separate force that only applies to the caliper.

I think we are in violent agreement about Newton, but you selectively apply Newton to the caliper and not the rest of the system.
« Last Edit: 06/09/2017 05:16 pm by jpo234 »
You want to be inspired by things. You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great. That's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and believing the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than being out there among the stars.

Offline whitelancer64

Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #386 on: 06/09/2017 05:22 pm »
NEWTON people. an object in motion will remain in motion if not acted upon by an external force.  caliper is accelerating at same rate as S2 +Dragon stack. 3 G's at the time suddenly acceleration stops ..SECO. an unrestrained object will drift forward, especially since there is a liquid sloshing around in the S2. This is different than 2 objects traveling a constant velocity.

You fail to account for the fact that when the acceleration stops, everything in the system is an "unrestrained object". The hypothetical caliper drifts forward, but so do S2 and the dragon. For the caliper to get ahead of S2 and bounce into dragon, it needs to accelerate relative to S2 and dragon. To accelerate, it needs a separate force that only applies to the caliper.

I think we are in violent agreement about Newton, but you selectively apply Newton to the caliper and not the rest of the system.

I guess fuel in the stage would never slosh around then? It should just stay down at the bottom after engine shutdown.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline RonM

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3340
  • Atlanta, Georgia USA
  • Liked: 2233
  • Likes Given: 1584
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #387 on: 06/09/2017 05:27 pm »
If it was calipers (not ice) and if upon shutdown of the second stage it moved forward from the second stage area to impact somewhere near the top of the trunk is it possible that it could have damaged the Dragon heat shield?  I don't recall if there is a barrier at the top of the trunk or if the heat shield should be visible once cargo is removed?

There is a barrier protecting the heatshield.

Offline Scylla

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 715
  • Clinton NC, USA
  • Liked: 1130
  • Likes Given: 150
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #388 on: 06/09/2017 05:37 pm »
Might I suggest that discussion on how Newtonian physics works is starting to drift far afield.

Perhaps a different or new thread is appropriate.
I reject your reality and substitute my own--Doctor Who

Offline jpo234

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Liked: 2323
  • Likes Given: 2234
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #389 on: 06/09/2017 05:39 pm »
I guess fuel in the stage would never slosh around then? It should just stay down at the bottom after engine shutdown.

I'm a little bit unsure here, because liquids are strange. There are other forces that would creep in (capillarity, surface tension, evaporation and fluid synamics because the fuel was flowing to the engine). So, generally I would assume that it primarilly stays close to what was the bottom, but I would not be surprised if over time it starts to spread out.

But if it was a heap of sand, than yes, it would stay at the bottom of the tank.

Edit: I will stop here, as Scylla suggested.
« Last Edit: 06/09/2017 05:41 pm by jpo234 »
You want to be inspired by things. You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great. That's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and believing the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than being out there among the stars.

Online HVM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 759
  • Finland
  • Liked: 1212
  • Likes Given: 616
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #390 on: 06/09/2017 05:45 pm »
Wrong Dragon...

@ dawei

Yhm... you don't really know what picax really is? There's no way that caliper can inflict any damage to the heat shield. It's not ceramics or carbon carbon, picax structure resemble more to a block of wood or stiff chipboard...

Offline srcln

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
  • Liked: 45
  • Likes Given: 260
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #391 on: 06/09/2017 05:52 pm »
Further note: I won't enter the discussion of it being a caliper or not, but it seems weird for a piece of ice to drift off camera in that direction (being first obscured by the S2-Dragon interface ring) and, a few seconds later, *reappear* on the same trajectory and with the same shape, receding into the distance.

I am referring to T+10:34 to 10:40.

Agreed. If that object seen at 10:34 is the same object, I can't imagine any trajectory for it that would have originated from the ROSA area deep in that trunk.  I can imagine trajectories that originate at the S2/trunk interface area, specifically where all the other separation debris comes from normally.  I suspect that "caliper" is smaller and much closer to the camera than the video makes it seem.

Edit: It's a big IF on that being the same object but it sure looks very similar.
« Last Edit: 06/09/2017 05:56 pm by mrcln »

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11944
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7961
  • Likes Given: 77688
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #392 on: 06/09/2017 06:08 pm »
Looks like the caliper comes out from one of the payloads inside the trunk. Not a pleasant sight.

Any news that NASA/SpaceX are investigating?

(There's a term from the STS era that I'm thinking of, but forgetting.  An anomaly investigation?)
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Online tleski

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 477
  • Washington, DC
  • Liked: 368
  • Likes Given: 764
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #393 on: 06/09/2017 06:19 pm »

(There's a term from the STS era that I'm thinking of, but forgetting.  An anomaly investigation?)


Officially there was no anomaly, so no reason to investigate.
The reddit post, which was the source of this information was deleted (but the discussion is still there) and replaced with an unofficial explanation that it was no caliper but an oddly shaped piece of ice. Many people are not buying it though. I don't think SpaceX made any comments related to this.

Offline jpo234

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
  • Liked: 2323
  • Likes Given: 2234
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #394 on: 06/09/2017 06:39 pm »

(There's a term from the STS era that I'm thinking of, but forgetting.  An anomaly investigation?)


Officially there was no anomaly, so no reason to investigate.
The reddit post, which was the source of this information was deleted (but the discussion is still there) and replaced with an unofficial explanation that it was no caliper but an oddly shaped piece of ice. Many people are not buying it though. I don't think SpaceX made any comments related to this.

Regarding the deleted Reddit post: Funny thing is, that old_sellsword, who is one of the reddit admins, liked Ed Kyles post that says:

That's not ice.
« Last Edit: 06/09/2017 06:41 pm by jpo234 »
You want to be inspired by things. You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great. That's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and believing the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than being out there among the stars.

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13469
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11869
  • Likes Given: 11115
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #395 on: 06/09/2017 07:04 pm »
The thought crossed my mind to separate the alleged anomaly discussions out, because we're not going to lock a mission discussion thread. So far, no action.

(not directed at any one person but at all of us) ... But do ask yourself if your post adds significant value or is just a quip or a back and forth with someone else that isn't really key.

Thanks.
« Last Edit: 06/09/2017 07:22 pm by Chris Bergin »
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Online Chris Bergin

Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #396 on: 06/09/2017 07:16 pm »
I have zero information on any of this, for what it's worth. And I see no one has anything of substance in the posts that came since so I don't see the validity of it continuing as a conversation UNTIL there is some actual information to discuss.

That's an order.

(Boom! Within 18.2 seconds someone asks me why I'm censoring "chat" ;D - Nope, you've all had a "chat", which got us nowhere and a rumor is dominating a mission discussion thread. I'm saying instead of 50 pages of "to ice or not to ice", we give it a break until there's some actual info to discuss.)
« Last Edit: 06/09/2017 07:26 pm by Chris Bergin »
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11944
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7961
  • Likes Given: 77688
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #397 on: 06/09/2017 07:55 pm »
https://blogs.nasa.gov/stationreport/2017/06/08/
Quote
Yesterday and overnight, Robotic Ground Controllers powered up the MSS cameras and lights and walked the Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) off the Node2 Power Data Grapple Fixture (PDGF) onto Mobile Base System (MBS) PDGF1. They then translated the Mobile Transporter (MT) from Worksite 6 (WS6) to WS2.  Finally the Robotics Ground Controllers unstowed the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) from MBS PDGF2.  The SPDM is holding the Multiple User System for Earth Sensing (MUSES) payload on the Enhanced Orbital Replacement Unit (ORU) Temporary Platform (EOTP) which will be installed later today on Express Logistic Carrier 4 (ELC4).

What is the timeline for the installation of NICER and ROSA?
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline kaa

  • Member
  • Posts: 50
  • Greenbelt MD
  • Liked: 91
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #398 on: 06/09/2017 10:14 pm »
https://blogs.nasa.gov/stationreport/2017/06/08/
Quote
Yesterday and overnight, Robotic Ground Controllers powered up the MSS cameras and lights and walked the Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) off the Node2 Power Data Grapple Fixture (PDGF) onto Mobile Base System (MBS) PDGF1. They then translated the Mobile Transporter (MT) from Worksite 6 (WS6) to WS2.  Finally the Robotics Ground Controllers unstowed the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) from MBS PDGF2.  The SPDM is holding the Multiple User System for Earth Sensing (MUSES) payload on the Enhanced Orbital Replacement Unit (ORU) Temporary Platform (EOTP) which will be installed later today on Express Logistic Carrier 4 (ELC4).

What is the timeline for the installation of NICER and ROSA?

You can find a timeline for NICER at https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/nicer/

Offline deruch

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2422
  • California
  • Liked: 2006
  • Likes Given: 5634
Re: SpaceX Falcon 9 : CRS-11 : June 3, 2017 : DISCUSSION
« Reply #399 on: 06/12/2017 08:26 am »
Does anyone have the original orbit for CRS-11 Dragon, prior to any post-separation S/C maneuvers?
Shouldn't reality posts be in "Advanced concepts"?  --Nomadd

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1