Author Topic: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)  (Read 448485 times)

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #940 on: 04/10/2018 08:35 am »
But that is the normal usage in the context of large engineering projects. A problem that is "easier" takes fewer resources to solve and hence is also "cheaper". Time, labor, capital, etc can all be reduced to a monetary value at this scale.
Perhaps so but it doesn't quite work that way in launch systems.

Consider
1 stage. Operates over the whole Mach range. 1 set of conditions. With sensible constraints on the design you can get a trajectory that will close with (smaller) payload in orbit.
2 Stages. Now you've got two designs to close. One of which is sitting on top of the other. You can't share  the analysis load. You do an analysis for both together (and their interactions) , separation, then destruction of the booster, then on to orbit for the US.

That's before you want to do reusability. As SX found out you can design something to come back down from LEO if you're prepared to sacrifice enough payload to do so.

Think about that for a moment and compare like for like.
Skylon 15tonnes to LEO. F9 to LEO 22.8tonnes. F9 wins hands down.

But Skylon comes back 100%. F9 US. 0 %. Skylon wins hands down.

So, was F9 "easier" to design? As an expendable yes. But it turns out that designing in economic reusability (although SX claim physical recovery of the US is possible with a small enough payload) has proved impossible.  And remember the TSTO design supposedly has more margin to begin with.
The "easier" option is apparently "scrap the partial RLV and design a full RLV from the ground up that's 10x bigger." We'll see how that works.

But TSTO, 3STO (or even 5STO, if you're talking about Pegasus with HAPS and including Stargazer) is what people know

Things change radically when you've got an engine that can provide >6x the Isp of the best viable
propellant combination available and you've got people who have an aircraft background.

And just a reminder. Skylon does it at the same payload fraction as an  TSTO ELV, not the 1% (or less) of the commonly proposed VTOL SSTO.
Due to the lack of existing SSTO launchers, designing a TSTO launcher is cheaper and easier.
I see my previous post was deleted, probably because of its "political" content.
But my point still stands.

Why do this?
The world market does not need Yet Another TSTO ELV.

Quote from: edzieba
You're implementing solved problems rather than solving some new problems.

Ever heard the expression "If you do what you always did you'll get what you always got?"
IRL The cheapest option to launching a payload is buy a launch (or hitch a ride as a secondary payload). There really is no shortage of ELV's on the planet.
Quote from: edzieba
Worse, you're trying to solve new problems that many people have already tried and failed to solve; the easy and cheap "just do X", "try Y", and "maybe Z will work out" solutions have all been found wanting,
This is one of those persistent myths that refuses to die. IRL the number of serious efforts to do an SSTO is very limited. The Chrysler Corps "SERV" project was probably the most detailed analysis prior to DC-X. Bono's various ideas seem more like proposals rather than detailed design studies. Note all
were a)VTOL b)Rocket powered.

The only real conclusion you can draw from this (very) small sample is "It is very hard to make an SSTO using this very tiny part of the design space."
This is not a surprise to anyone with a grasp of basic rocket engineering. The corollary is "So what's the rest of the design space like for SSTO viability?"
Quote from: edzieba
which is why we're even considering the brain-meltingly complicated regenerating-shifting-multi-cycle SABRE engine in the first place.
If you can understand how an RL10 pumps its propellants you can understand SABRE. The start sequence of the SSME is more complex due to the very tight coupling between its elements.
Quote from: edzieba
Designing an upper stage from scratch is expensive, but the point is you don't need to design one from scratch for a minimum viable launcher.
Provided it's also been tested over the whole range of stresses it will need to survive.
Quote from: edzieba
Buy a STAR PAM, pay ULA to strengthen a Centaur for horizontal integration, etc.
That being ULA and that being an RL10, which has "More touch labor than a Lamborghini" I'd say that'll be in the multi $Bn range
Quote from: edzieba
Once you have money coming in you can invest in an optimised upper stage if needed, but as we've seen with Falcon 9 an 'optimum' upper stage is not strictly necessary.
No, we've seen that a reusable F9 US is not economically possible.

But you're right about the "money coming in." It's just the money is from the CRS 2 programme and is about $14Bn, possbily the best investment NASA has ever made.

Seem if you're going to build a vehicle the size of a 787 or A380 you need a budget like that of a 787 or A380.
Who knew?
« Last Edit: 04/10/2018 08:42 am by john smith 19 »
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline speedevil

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4406
  • Fife
  • Liked: 2762
  • Likes Given: 3369
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #941 on: 04/10/2018 09:50 am »
Think about that for a moment and compare like for like.
Skylon 15tonnes to LEO. F9 to LEO 22.8tonnes. F9 wins hands down.

But Skylon comes back 100%. F9 US. 0 %. Skylon wins hands down.

So, was F9 "easier" to design? As an expendable yes. But it turns out that designing in economic reusability (although SX claim physical recovery of the US is possible with a small enough payload) has proved impossible.  And remember the TSTO design supposedly has more margin to begin with.
The "easier" option is apparently "scrap the partial RLV and design a full RLV from the ground up that's 10x bigger." We'll see how that works.

But TSTO, 3STO (or even 5STO, if you're talking about Pegasus with HAPS and including Stargazer) is what people know

Things change radically when you've got an engine that can provide >6x the Isp of the best viable
propellant combination available and you've got people who have an aircraft background.

And just a reminder. Skylon does it at the same payload fraction as an  TSTO ELV, not the 1% (or less) of the commonly proposed VTOL SSTO.

Skylon may do.
Asserting Skylon is easier because it has one stage, before it has ever flown, seems perhaps overoptimistic.

And it's not 6* the ISP over most of the delta-v range.

Unfortunately, it is looking likely that if BFR is not in fact much delayed, Skylon will be flying at best against a bugfixed V2 of BFR, not an initial version. BFR has enough systematic margin that enormous amounts can go wrong and exceed 15 tons to orbit.

The complicated funding environment in the UK at the moment may not help things along at all either..

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #942 on: 04/10/2018 10:50 am »
Skylon may do.
Asserting Skylon is easier because it has one stage, before it has ever flown, seems perhaps overoptimistic.
Easier in the design process. There are no aerodynamic interaction issues to cope with during ascent or descent and the propellant usage keeps the design more or less trimmed throughout. Both make analysis of the design easier.
Quote from: speedevil
And it's not 6* the ISP over most of the delta-v range.
It's more like 6.6x over enough of the range to make the difference in viability.
Quote from: speedevil
Unfortunately, it is looking likely that if BFR is not in fact much delayed, Skylon will be flying at best against a bugfixed V2 of BFR, not an initial version. BFR has enough systematic margin that enormous amounts can go wrong and exceed 15 tons to orbit.
And I hear those goalposts being dug up and being moved again  :(
Still waiting for the first landing of an F9 US.

When Musk described the 2022 launch date for BFS to  Mars as "aspirational" I think most people translated that as "If we run 3 shifts 7 days a week and nothing goes wrong in the development process."
On the upside they still have 53-56 months left. 
OTOH the fact they are looking for someone with 20 years experience of composite mfg and they still don't have a TPS lead suggests there isn't as much slack in their schedule as some of their admirers might think.
By January 1st 2023 we'll all know.
Quote from: speedevil
The complicated funding environment in the UK at the moment may not help things along at all either..
I'm not really sure what you mean by this. Could you elaborate?
« Last Edit: 04/10/2018 10:54 am by john smith 19 »
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline AnalogMan

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3446
  • Cambridge, UK
  • Liked: 1621
  • Likes Given: 54
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #943 on: 04/11/2018 11:54 pm »
Rolls-Royce and Boeing invest in UK space engine
By Jonathan Amos, April 12, 2018

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43732035

"Reaction Engines Limited (REL), the UK company developing a revolutionary aerospace engine, has announced investments from both Boeing and Rolls-Royce.
[...]
The new investments amount to £26.5m.

Included in this sum are contributions from Baillie Gifford Asset Management and Woodford Investment Management.

It lifts the total capital raised in the past three years to about £100m. The British government has already put in £60m; BAE Systems initially injected £20m in 2015 and has upped its stake in this latest financial round."


Story also covered in many other media outlets.
« Last Edit: 04/11/2018 11:55 pm by AnalogMan »

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2783
  • Liked: 804
  • Likes Given: 1187
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #944 on: 04/12/2018 02:25 am »
Rolls-Royce and Boeing invest in UK space engine
By Jonathan Amos, April 12, 2018

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43732035[/i]

The concept art looks different to anything I've seen before.  Have I missed something?
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #945 on: 04/12/2018 06:44 am »
You missed the part where Skylon was sidetracked for more down to earth testbeds and concepts, including a single engine testbed and an air-launcher.

One interesting quote from Boeing

CNBC....

Quote
>
"We expect to leverage their revolutionary technology to support Boeing’s pursuit of hypersonic flight," Nordlund said in a statement.
>
« Last Edit: 04/12/2018 06:48 am by docmordrid »
DM

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14177
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #946 on: 04/12/2018 06:48 am »
You missed the part where Skylon was sidetracked for more down to earth testbeds and concepts, including an air-launcher as depicted.

One interesting quote from Boeing

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/11/boeing-horizonx-ventures-joins-37-million-reaction-engines-investment.html

Quote
>
"We expect to leverage their revolutionary technology to support Boeing’s pursuit of hypersonic flight," Nordlund said in a statement.
>

That might be their rival ISR concept to LM’s so called SR-72.

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #947 on: 04/12/2018 06:55 am »
Rolls-Royce and Boeing invest in UK space engine
By Jonathan Amos, April 12, 2018

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43732035[/i]
The concept art looks different to anything I've seen before.  Have I missed something?
I think you're right. It's sort of a mix of the USAF TSTO concepts and the LAPCAT A2 design for an M5 airliner, although IIRC A2 had a 3 nacelle on the centreline in a slightly awkward drop down arrangement.

Below the wing engine pods are SOP for large airliners such as Boeing and Airbus mfg.

On the upside the high wing (relative to the fuselage) offers good cross range. The downside is its lack of protection for the fuselage in reentry.

The rather flat sides are not good for side winds either.  That might have been necessary in the early 1970's, when CFD was not up to coping with curves over a 23Mach speed range but 45years later things have improved a bit there.

This is excellent news for REL but it's disappointing that Airbus is not involved. In Europe the long game is what is after Ariane 6. For people concerned about this not being "European" enough I'd remind them that Canada is also a member of ESA, and it's not even on the same continent
« Last Edit: 04/12/2018 08:41 am by john smith 19 »
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14177
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
« Last Edit: 04/12/2018 08:04 am by Star One »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #949 on: 04/12/2018 08:06 am »
REL press release:

Quote
Reaction Engines secures £26.5m investment from new industrial and financial investors

– New strategic investments from Boeing and Rolls-Royce, additional investment from BAE Systems

– Financial investments from Baillie Gifford Asset Management and Woodford Investment Management


12 April 2018 – Reaction Engines Limited (‘Reaction Engines’) today announced that it has raised a further £26.5 million in a strategic fundraising by securing backing from some of the most influential names in aerospace and finance which will support its development of SABRE™ – a revolutionary new class of aerospace engine combining jet and rocket technologies.

New strategic investors are Boeing HorizonX Ventures, the investment arm of Boeing, the world’s largest aerospace company and leading manufacturer of commercial jetliners and defence, space and security systems; and Rolls-Royce, a pre-eminent engineering company focused on world class power and propulsion systems whose experience and capability in building complex engine systems is well known.

These new investors are in addition to BAE Systems, a global defence, aerospace and security company, which invested £20.6 million in Reaction Engines in 2015 and is providing further investment in this round, building on existing collaboration to provide expertise in engineering and programmes.

Financial investments in Reaction Engines will also be made by Baillie Gifford Asset Management and Woodford Investment Management.

The Company anticipates further investment interest in this funding round from existing shareholders and other financial institutions. All investments will take the form of a subscription for new shares, which is subject to the approval of existing shareholders.

Mark Thomas, Chief Executive of Reaction Engines said:

“This is a significant milestone for Reaction Engines and I am delighted to welcome our new strategic and financial shareholders. In addition to providing our largest round of private investment, these new partners bring invaluable expertise in both hypersonics and engine technologies with significant access to target markets. This is not only a vote of confidence in our technology but also underlines belief in our ability to develop a thriving commercial business which will provide strong financial returns for our shareholders.”

 

Steve Nordlund, Vice President of Boeing HorizonX said:

“We continue to connect capabilities around the globe with our investment in Reaction Engines, which is our first in a UK-based company. As Reaction Engines unlocks advanced propulsion that could change the future of air and space travel, we expect to leverage their revolutionary technology to support Boeing’s pursuit of hypersonic flight.”
Paul Stein, Chief Technology Officer of Rolls-Royce said:

“We are delighted to become a strategic investor in Reaction Engines Limited, an innovative UK company that is helping push the boundaries of aviation technology. We look forward to working with REL and assisting with the development of their technology, and we plan to incorporate this technology into our own future products.”

 

Sam Gyimah, Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation, said: “These investments are a real vote of confidence in Reaction Engines and its revolutionary SABRE engine, which has benefited from £60m in UK Government support. Boeing and Rolls-Royce will bring world-class expertise to the project ahead of its testing at Westcott, alongside the new National Space Propulsion Facility. “This is an exciting time as the UK’s commercial space industry goes from strength to strength, boosting the economy and creating high-skilled jobs across the country. Through our ambitious Industrial Strategy, we are working with the sector to pursue new opportunities, develop technologies and infrastructure, and enable small satellite launch and sub-orbital flight from UK spaceports for the first time.”

 

The investments agreed to date take the total raised by Reaction Engines in the last three years to over £100 million, including British Government funding commitments, and will support key elements of the company’s SABRE development programme, which has the objective of commencing ground-based testing of a SABRE engine core in 2020.

Reaction Engines has recently achieved a number of milestones for the development of SABRE, and is on track for the test of the engine core in 2020. It is currently constructing a new facility in Westcott, Buckinghamshire, UK for SABRE testing.

The fundraising will also allow Reaction Engines to accelerate its commercialisation plans, with proprietary technology opportunities in motorsport, electric vehicle thermal management, waste heat recuperation, small satellite cooling and aero-engines.

The Company has continued to grow its presence in the United States and recently secured a contract from the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to conduct high-temperature airflow testing of a Reaction Engines precooler heat exchanger. These tests will demonstrate the Company’s world-leading heat exchanger technology, contributing to a rapid leap forward in precooled propulsion, for both jet and combined cycle engines, as well as opening exciting possibilities for novel vehicle thermal management solutions.

ENDS

https://www.reactionengines.co.uk/reaction-engines-secures-26-5m-investment-from-new-industrial-and-financial-investors/

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2783
  • Liked: 804
  • Likes Given: 1187
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #950 on: 04/12/2018 08:06 am »
You missed the part where Skylon was sidetracked for more down to earth testbeds and concepts, including a single engine testbed and an air-launcher.

One interesting quote from Boeing

CNBC....

Quote
>
"We expect to leverage their revolutionary technology to support Boeing’s pursuit of hypersonic flight," Nordlund said in a statement.
>

No I hadn't, this drawing is neither a testbed nor an air launcher.  At least not obviously
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14177
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #951 on: 04/12/2018 08:42 am »
https://twitter.com/ReactionEngines/status/984341611390947328?s=20

Quote
Our new partners bring invaluable expertise in both #hypersonics and engine technologies and will support key elements of the SABRE development programme. @RollsRoyce @Boeing @BoeingUK

New tweet & new image I think.

Offline JCRM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 561
  • Great Britain
  • Liked: 339
  • Likes Given: 478
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #952 on: 04/12/2018 09:03 am »
I knew I'd seen it before: SABRE powered first stage of TSTO picture at Orbital Access from 2016
« Last Edit: 04/12/2018 09:05 am by JCRM »

Offline JCRM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 561
  • Great Britain
  • Liked: 339
  • Likes Given: 478
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #953 on: 04/12/2018 10:40 am »
https://twitter.com/ReactionEngines/status/984341611390947328?s=20

Quote
Our new partners bring invaluable expertise in both #hypersonics and engine technologies and will support key elements of the SABRE development programme. @RollsRoyce @Boeing @BoeingUK

New tweet & new image I think.
the image isn't new, it's a SABRE 3, and if Word Press is anything to go by it's been around since May 2016

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14177
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #954 on: 04/12/2018 12:00 pm »
Here’s the UK government Press Release.

Global aerospace giants invest in UK firm Reaction Engines

Science Minister Sam Gyimah hails new private investment from Boeing and Rolls-Royce as a 'vote of confidence' in British-built SABRE rocket and jet engine.

Oxfordshire-based Reaction Engines has secured a further £26.5 million to support the development of SABRE - a revolutionary new class of aerospace engine combining jet and rocket technologies.

The UK Government has previously committed £60 million funding via the UK Space Agency and the European Space Agency to support the development of the project. The new strategic investors are Boeing HorizonX Ventures, the investment arm of the world’s largest aerospace company Boeing; and Rolls-Royce, which has been at the forefront of British engineering for over a century.

They join BAE Systems, which invested £20.6 million in Reaction Engines in 2015 and is providing further investment in this round, as well as financial investors Baillie Gifford Asset Management and Woodford Investment Management.

Together these investments take the total raised by Reaction Engines in the last three years to over £100 million.

Sam Gyimah, Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation, said:

“These investments are a real vote of confidence in Reaction Engines and its revolutionary SABRE engine, which has benefited from £60m in UK Government support. Boeing and Rolls-Royce will bring world-class expertise to the project ahead of its testing at Westcott, alongside the new National Space Propulsion Facility.

“This is an exciting time as the UK’s commercial space industry goes from strength to strength, boosting the economy and creating high-skilled jobs across the country. Through our ambitious Industrial Strategy, we are working with the sector to pursue new opportunities, develop technologies and infrastructure, and enable small satellite launch and sub-orbital flight from UK spaceports for the first time.”

Reaction Engines is currently constructing a new facility in Westcott, Buckinghamshire, UK for SABRE testing. The UK Space Agency is also investing more than £4 million in a National Propulsion Test Facility on the same site, which has a strong history of rocketry research for defence and space development.

Mark Thomas, Chief Executive of Reaction Engines said:

“This is a significant milestone for Reaction Engines and I am delighted to welcome our new strategic and financial shareholders. In addition to providing our largest round of private investment, these new partners bring invaluable expertise in both hypersonics and engine technologies with significant access to target markets. This is not only a vote of confidence in our technology but also underlines belief in our ability to develop a thriving commercial business which will provide strong financial returns for our shareholders.”

Find out more about the UK National Space Propulsion Facility

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14177
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #955 on: 04/12/2018 03:58 pm »
I don’t know if any if either of these are new images, the one at the building site might be.

https://twitter.com/ReactionEngines/status/984440584042622976?s=20

Quote
We’re excited to continue pursuing and achieving our company goals, including our upcoming #HTX test later this year at our #TF2 test facility @reactionengUSA  @SpaceportCO

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #956 on: 04/12/2018 05:50 pm »
https://twitter.com/ReactionEngines/status/984341611390947328?s=20

Quote
Our new partners bring invaluable expertise in both #hypersonics and engine technologies and will support key elements of the SABRE development programme. @RollsRoyce @Boeing @BoeingUK

New tweet & new image I think.
the image isn't new, it's a SABRE 3, and if Word Press is anything to go by it's been around since May 2016
Noted.
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #957 on: 04/12/2018 05:51 pm »
I don’t know if any if either of these are new images, the one at the building site might be.

https://twitter.com/ReactionEngines/status/984440584042622976?s=20

Quote
We’re excited to continue pursuing and achieving our company goals, including our upcoming #HTX test later this year at our #TF2 test facility @reactionengUSA  @SpaceportCO
The left one definitely isn't. It's a look at the stuff REL are deliveing to their Colorado subsidiary for DARPA testing.
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Offline t43562

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 300
  • UK
  • Liked: 164
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #958 on: 04/13/2018 04:22 pm »
https://www.bis-space.com/2018/01/14/20102/current-topics-in-rocket-propulsion-an-open-source-conference

This is tomorrow (Saturday) - any questions? I'm not technical so I may fail to ask them properly.  Maybe someone better will be there?

Quote
Mike Hood – Test Facility, Lead Engineer & Russ Payne – Chief Design Engineer – Reaction Engines – SABRE TF1 – Development of the SABRE Demonstrator Test Facility

The Synergetic Air Breathing Rocket Engine (SABRE) is a class of combined cycle engines that have the potential to revolutionise aerospace propulsion. SABRE burns hydrogen fuel in air-breathing mode up to speeds in excess of Mach 5, then switches to a high-performance rocket mode that utilises on-board liquid oxygen. Novel light-weight compact heat exchangers allow efficient thermodynamic energy exchange between engine components via a helium loop, which results in an attractive combination of high thrust to weight and specific impulse in air-breathing mode.

One of the unique features of SABRE is that much of its air-breathing operation can be tested on the ground. Testing an engine as unique as SABRE however, requires a custom-made facility. Conventional air propulsion facilities require large air feeds and conventional fuel systems; such a test facility can be fully enclosed if noise controls require it. This enclosed approach is not, however, compatible with hydrogen-fuelled systems. Conventional rocket test stands are designed to handle hydrogen fuels safely but lack the air inflow systems of a conventional air-breathing test facility and must be located remotely to accommodate the noise levels they generate during test.

This presentation will look at the current development of the SABRE engine and the construction of its unique test facility SABRE TF1, at Westcott Venture Park.

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Re: The Reaction Engines Skylon/SABRE Master Thread (6)
« Reply #959 on: 04/13/2018 06:36 pm »
https://www.bis-space.com/2018/01/14/20102/current-topics-in-rocket-propulsion-an-open-source-conference

This is tomorrow (Saturday) - any questions? I'm not technical so I may fail to ask them properly.  Maybe someone better will be there?

Quote
Mike Hood – Test Facility, Lead Engineer & Russ Payne – Chief Design Engineer – Reaction Engines – SABRE TF1 – Development of the SABRE Demonstrator Test Facility

The Synergetic Air Breathing Rocket Engine (SABRE) is a class of combined cycle engines that have the potential to revolutionise aerospace propulsion. SABRE burns hydrogen fuel in air-breathing mode up to speeds in excess of Mach 5, then switches to a high-performance rocket mode that utilises on-board liquid oxygen. Novel light-weight compact heat exchangers allow efficient thermodynamic energy exchange between engine components via a helium loop, which results in an attractive combination of high thrust to weight and specific impulse in air-breathing mode.

One of the unique features of SABRE is that much of its air-breathing operation can be tested on the ground. Testing an engine as unique as SABRE however, requires a custom-made facility. Conventional air propulsion facilities require large air feeds and conventional fuel systems; such a test facility can be fully enclosed if noise controls require it. This enclosed approach is not, however, compatible with hydrogen-fuelled systems. Conventional rocket test stands are designed to handle hydrogen fuels safely but lack the air inflow systems of a conventional air-breathing test facility and must be located remotely to accommodate the noise levels they generate during test.

This presentation will look at the current development of the SABRE engine and the construction of its unique test facility SABRE TF1, at Westcott Venture Park.
Well I guess the one's I'd like to ask would be
1)What parts of SABRE will they be testing on the stand in the UK and US?
2) Will it be the SABRE 3 or SABRE 4 cycles they will be testing?
3) How is the test stand construction going? The photos from the site look like progress has been pretty good. Is it at or ahead of schedule?
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1