Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 CRS/SpX-10 Dragon - Feb. 19, 2017 - Discussion  (Read 418678 times)

Offline oldAtlas_Eguy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Florida
  • Liked: 5010
  • Likes Given: 1511
SFN reported in their article 1.7 million pounds. If correct that is ~188klbs for the M1DFT+ engines. That would be the fuller thrust versions.

The question is the reported value correct?

article
http://spaceflightnow.com/2017/02/12/fire-returns-to-flame-trench-at-apollo-era-launch-pad-in-florida/

Offline Hankelow8

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 189
  • UK
  • Liked: 166
  • Likes Given: 68
A bit of nostalgia for you, me standing in the flame trench at LC 39A in 1972.
« Last Edit: 02/13/2017 01:46 pm by Hankelow8 »

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
How thoroughly is the flame trench cleaned, post-flight? I was wondering how much SRB exhaust residue was blown out by the Falcon-9 test fire!
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline atsf90east

  • Member
  • Posts: 94
  • Olathe, KS USA, Earth
  • Liked: 103
  • Likes Given: 136
How thoroughly is the flame trench cleaned, post-flight? I was wondering how much SRB exhaust residue was blown out by the Falcon-9 test fire!

I think I read somewhere that much of the flame trench refractory brick had to be replaced, in which case there would not have been accumulated residue. Besides, anything loose would be considered FOD, and cleaned up as part of the pad activation.
Attended Launches: Space Shuttle: STS-85, STS-95, STS-96, STS-103. Falcon 9: Thaicom-8

Offline ChrisGebhardt

  • Assistant Managing Editor
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7842
  • ad astra scientia
  • ~1 AU
  • Liked: 7877
  • Likes Given: 853
How thoroughly is the flame trench cleaned, post-flight? I was wondering how much SRB exhaust residue was blown out by the Falcon-9 test fire!

I think I read somewhere that much of the flame trench refractory brick had to be replaced, in which case there would not have been accumulated residue. Besides, anything loose would be considered FOD, and cleaned up as part of the pad activation.

Indeed.  FOD was always cleared after each launch and before each launch.  However, if the question is about washing down the flame trench after each Shuttle launch, the highly corrosive elements of the SRB exhaust was washed down/away from the entire pad after each Shuttle launch as part of an effort to keep the pad from corroding.  But the trench wasn't given a scrubbing per se.

And the brick was largely replaced in large sections at 39A after STS-124 blew a lot of the bricks off and out of the trench at SRB ignition.

Reference: https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/07/investigation-confirms-vertical-debris-events-during-sts-124-launch/

(Edited to include reference link)
« Last Edit: 02/13/2017 02:30 pm by ChrisGebhardt »

Offline PahTo

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Port Angeles
  • Liked: 272
  • Likes Given: 1217
How thoroughly is the flame trench cleaned, post-flight? I was wondering how much SRB exhaust residue was blown out by the Falcon-9 test fire!

I think I read somewhere that much of the flame trench refractory brick had to be replaced, in which case there would not have been accumulated residue. Besides, anything loose would be considered FOD, and cleaned up as part of the pad activation.

Indeed.  FOD was always cleared after each launch and before each launch.  However, if the question is about washing down the flame trench after each Shuttle launch, the highly corrosive elements of the SRB exhaust was washed down/away from the entire pad after each Shuttle launch as part of an effort to keep the pad from corroding.  But the trench wasn't given a scrubbing per se.

And the brick was largely replaced in large sections at 39A after STS-124 blew a lot of the bricks off and out of the trench at SRB ignition.

Reference: https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2008/07/investigation-confirms-vertical-debris-events-during-sts-124-launch/

(Edited to include reference link)

Correct on all counts (thanks for the link as well, Chris).
For those interested in the new material used in the trench, google "fondue fyre".

Offline mdeep

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 188
  • NSF Photographer
  • Tampa Bay
  • Liked: 1138
  • Likes Given: 6
And for accredited media peeps - do you know yet where you will be able to set up your unattended cameras for the launch yet? Interested to hear what fields of view will be available to you.

Unfortunately, no. We haven't even gotten our schedule yet from KSC.

At SLC-40 SpaceX keeps us outside the perimeter fence on the East side. I would hope they don't repeat that policy at 39A, as it would put us about 1/3 of a mile away and possibly leave us with an obstructed view (Depending on how the TEL and various utility poles line up).

Offline bdub217

  • Member
  • Posts: 23
  • Liked: 19
  • Likes Given: 0
Unfortunately, no. We haven't even gotten our schedule yet from KSC.

At SLC-40 SpaceX keeps us outside the perimeter fence on the East side. I would hope they don't repeat that policy at 39A, as it would put us about 1/3 of a mile away and possibly leave us with an obstructed view (Depending on how the TEL and various utility poles line up).

Have they ruled in/out media access to the LC39 press site?
« Last Edit: 02/13/2017 03:10 pm by bdub217 »

Offline DOCinCT

SFN reported in their article 1.7 million pounds. If correct that is ~188klbs for the M1DFT+ engines. That would be the fuller thrust versions.

The question is the reported value correct?

article
http://spaceflightnow.com/2017/02/12/fire-returns-to-flame-trench-at-apollo-era-launch-pad-in-florida/
I think they are using the numbers (7,607kN 1,710,000 lbf) from the SpaceX Falcon 9 info page. This is may be based on the Merlin 1-D promised for Block 5 or the current flying Full Thrust version.
EDIT - Revision 2 of the Falcon Users Guide lists it as 6,804 kN 1,530,000 lbf  which is the often quote 170,00 lbf per Merlin 1-D.
« Last Edit: 02/13/2017 03:32 pm by DOCinCT »

Offline mdeep

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 188
  • NSF Photographer
  • Tampa Bay
  • Liked: 1138
  • Likes Given: 6
Unfortunately, no. We haven't even gotten our schedule yet from KSC.

At SLC-40 SpaceX keeps us outside the perimeter fence on the East side. I would hope they don't repeat that policy at 39A, as it would put us about 1/3 of a mile away and possibly leave us with an obstructed view (Depending on how the TEL and various utility poles line up).

Have they ruled in/out media access to the LC39 press site?
Also unknown. Obviously the press site will be used to coordinate various pre- and post-launch events, but launch/landing viewing is still TBD.

Offline SWGlassPit

  • I break space hardware
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 852
  • Liked: 902
  • Likes Given: 142
That seems like an awfully easterly azimuth for an ISS launch.  No activation of W158A or W158B?

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50717
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85227
  • Likes Given: 38177
Quote
Cabana: Dragon delivered to pad 39A for integration with Falcon 9 rocket. Pending normal ops and FAA license, launch Saturday a.m.

https://twitter.com/flatoday_jdean/status/831560430896160768

Edit: from James Dean's previous tweet "KSC Director Bob Cabana at @NSCFL"
« Last Edit: 02/14/2017 06:13 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Online shooter6947

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Idaho
  • Liked: 116
  • Likes Given: 915
F9-032 CRS-10 Launch Hazard Areas Map (Local Notice To Mariners) for February 18th, alternatively 19th.


I don't get it -- since the stage-1 landing is RTLS, and there's no fairing to jettison on this one, what's up with that orange outline?  Maybe for if there's an engine failure and the booster burns to depletion to make up for it and then falls into the ocean?

Offline king1999

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
  • F-Niner Fan
  • Atlanta, GA
  • Liked: 309
  • Likes Given: 1291
F9-032 CRS-10 Launch Hazard Areas Map (Local Notice To Mariners) for February 18th, alternatively 19th.


I don't get it -- since the stage-1 landing is RTLS, and there's no fairing to jettison on this one, what's up with that orange outline?  Maybe for if there's an engine failure and the booster burns to depletion to make up for it and then falls into the ocean?

Hazard areas are based on all possible outcomes including failures.

Offline mdeep

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 188
  • NSF Photographer
  • Tampa Bay
  • Liked: 1138
  • Likes Given: 6
Unfortunately, no. We haven't even gotten our schedule yet from KSC.

At SLC-40 SpaceX keeps us outside the perimeter fence on the East side. I would hope they don't repeat that policy at 39A, as it would put us about 1/3 of a mile away and possibly leave us with an obstructed view (Depending on how the TEL and various utility poles line up).

Have they ruled in/out media access to the LC39 press site?
Also unknown. Obviously the press site will be used to coordinate various pre- and post-launch events, but launch/landing viewing is still TBD.

Following up on this now that the schedule is out: They are allowing a limited number of media to setup cameras inside the 39A perimeter. This is a welcome surprise as it signals NASA/KSC will be keeping coverage opportunities similar to shuttle.

Launch viewing opportunities include the usual sites: 39A press site, NASA Causeway, and the VAB roof.

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5353
(snip)

Launch viewing opportunities include the usual sites: 39A press site, NASA Causeway, and the VAB roof.

Where did you see this?
As far as I know official viewing will be at the Turning Basin, Kurs Park on the Banana River, and a VIP location.
The Turning Basin is one of the press sites but not one specific to 39A.
Who gets to view from the top of the VAB?
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5353
And in the NASA Doppelganger to NSF, where every discussion evolves to include SpaceX, every NASA discussion of anything turns into a discussion of SLS, including this morning's press release:

Quote
Friday, Feb. 17 (L-1 Day): Kennedy Director Robert Cabana will take news media on a three-part tour of facilities in the Launch Complex 39 area. Media will depart the Press Site by bus at 8 a.m. and will receive an update from NASA on transition of government facilities to the aerospace industry, and how that approach enables NASA and industry success. Media will then depart for the Vehicle Assembly Building, where they will hear about the extensive work completed in the facility to prepare for the Space Launch System, and how that work enables members of the aerospace industry to use the facility between NASA missions. The last stop will be in Boeing’s Commercial Crew and Cargo Processing Facility, previously a shuttle processing facility, where the company is manufacturing its Starliner spacecraft for flight tests and ultimately crew rotation missions with NASA’s Commercial Crew Program.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline mdeep

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 188
  • NSF Photographer
  • Tampa Bay
  • Liked: 1138
  • Likes Given: 6
(snip)

Launch viewing opportunities include the usual sites: 39A press site, NASA Causeway, and the VAB roof.

Where did you see this?
As far as I know official viewing will be at the Turning Basin, Kurs Park on the Banana River, and a VIP location.
The Turning Basin is one of the press sites but not one specific to 39A.
Who gets to view from the top of the VAB?

I should say LC39 press site (not 'A'); launch viewing there is a given unless otherwise noted.

Causeway and VAB were confirmed in the media advisory that went out this afternoon:

Quote
LAUNCH VIEWING

Saturday, Feb. 18 (L-0 Day): News media wanting to view the launch from the NASA Causeway will depart the Press Site by bus at 8:30 a.m.

A sign-up sheet will be available in the newsroom for media desiring to photograph the launch from the roof of the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB). Space is limited for this activity, so media must sign up in person. At 8:45 a.m. Saturday, Feb. 18, media selected will depart the Press Site for the VAB.
« Last Edit: 02/15/2017 10:53 pm by mdeep »


Offline ryan.riley

  • Member
  • Posts: 0
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 4
« Last Edit: 02/16/2017 02:56 pm by gongora »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1