It's just color bars. With 197 viewers. Most watched color bars on the internet...
Quote from: SWGlassPit on 02/09/2017 07:31 pmQuote from: ChrisGebhardt on 02/09/2017 07:11 pmDragon is not constrained by the high beta angle. If it was, it wouldn't be launching on a 30-day docked mission until after the cutout.It's not Dragon, it's the robotics ops associated with attaching Dragon to ISS.Can they not do any robotics ops at all no matter the short duration of the beta exceedance? I thought it had to do with heat build-up/concentration from the radiators. Does that automatically occur once the beta angle is exceeded? I thought it took time to build up (i.e., I remember NASA stating many times during Shuttle that the start and end of the cut outs weren't firm and could wiggle with analysis.)
Quote from: ChrisGebhardt on 02/09/2017 07:11 pmDragon is not constrained by the high beta angle. If it was, it wouldn't be launching on a 30-day docked mission until after the cutout.It's not Dragon, it's the robotics ops associated with attaching Dragon to ISS.
Dragon is not constrained by the high beta angle. If it was, it wouldn't be launching on a 30-day docked mission until after the cutout.
There she is! https://twitter.com/cbs_spacenews/status/830038750633791488
To me, it appears that each shot was on an opposite side of 39a.
Quote from: Kansan52 on 02/10/2017 03:37 pmTo me, it appears that each shot was on an opposite side of 39a.But the RSS can't be on the left of the FSS at the same time F9 is behind them both. It has to be horizontally flipped.
Quote from: Chris Bergin on 02/10/2017 12:02 pmThere she is! https://twitter.com/cbs_spacenews/status/830038750633791488For those like me who struggled with the geometry of this (where's the camera shooting from?), note that this image is FLIPPED horizontally. Perhaps because it was done with a telescope. This is confirmed by the wider shot that Harwood also tweeted.
You will notice in those last couple of shots of the Falcon rolled up to the top of 39A (but not yet standing), that the Dragon is not there for once.
There she is!https://twitter.com/cbs_spacenews/status/830038750633791488
Quote from: rpapo on 02/10/2017 12:42 pmYou will notice in those last couple of shots of the Falcon rolled up to the top of 39A (but not yet standing), that the Dragon is not there for once.YesQuote from: Chris Bergin on 02/10/2017 12:02 pmThere she is!https://twitter.com/cbs_spacenews/status/830038750633791488Have we previously seen this sort of hemispherical cap on the second stage?
Quote from: DOCinCT on 02/10/2017 12:45 pmQuote from: rpapo on 02/10/2017 12:42 pmYou will notice in those last couple of shots of the Falcon rolled up to the top of 39A (but not yet standing), that the Dragon is not there for once.Is that a special cap just for the static fire test?Yes, a similar thing was seen on the JASON-3 booster.
Quote from: rpapo on 02/10/2017 12:42 pmYou will notice in those last couple of shots of the Falcon rolled up to the top of 39A (but not yet standing), that the Dragon is not there for once.Is that a special cap just for the static fire test?
Have we previously seen this sort of hemispherical cap on the second stage?
Quote from: Comga on 02/10/2017 05:21 pmHave we previously seen this sort of hemispherical cap on the second stage?It can be found on page 15 Section 3.3 of the Falcon 9 Users' Guide - it's known as the Payload Attach Fitting (PAF).
A user on Facebook says it's going vertical right now.
Quote from: mvpel on 02/10/2017 06:14 pmQuote from: Comga on 02/10/2017 05:21 pmHave we previously seen this sort of hemispherical cap on the second stage?It can be found on page 15 Section 3.3 of the Falcon 9 Users' Guide - it's known as the Payload Attach Fitting (PAF).Not quite. The PAF goes in the same place and has the same shape, but is very different functionally. Also, Dragon doesn't use a PAF, so they wouldn't put one on a booster for a CRS flight.
Any idea of how long it will be vertical? Might ride out to see if it stays vertical for a while.