Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Nusantara Satu (PSN VI)/GTO-1/SpaceIL : Feb. 21/22, 2019: Discussion  (Read 138223 times)

Online LouScheffer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3452
  • Liked: 6263
  • Likes Given: 882
I get an apogee of 69,200 km.  Cutoff at 36423 km/hr, altitude 221 km, in the rotating earth reference frame (since speed was 0 at launch).  So assuming 27 degree inclination, we vector add the Earth's rotational speed to get 10547 m/s in inertial frame.   And if you are going that speed at 221 km, your apogee will be 69,200 km.

Offline mme

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1510
  • Santa Barbara, CA, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Virgo Supercluster
  • Liked: 2034
  • Likes Given: 5383
Space is not Highlander.  There can, and will, be more than one.

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
Forbes is already playing the lunar angle

https://www.forbes.com/sites/elizabethhowell1/2019/02/21/lunar-launch-boosts-spacex-into-new-sphere-of-business/#92d3c5616b63

Quote
Lunar Launch Boosts SpaceX Into New Sphere of Business
>
« Last Edit: 02/22/2019 01:41 am by docmordrid »
DM

Offline FinalFrontier

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4492
  • Space Watcher
  • Liked: 1332
  • Likes Given: 173
Per Elon on Twitter this booster will be used for dragon abort test. This was her last full flight.
3-30-2017: The start of a great future
"Live Long and Prosper"

Offline ATPTourFan

  • Member
  • Posts: 98
  • Liked: 81
  • Likes Given: 4520
Not long. Usually they do some quick clean-up edits and post the fully listed video shortly after close of webcast.

Offline Alexphysics

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1625
  • Spain
  • Liked: 6027
  • Likes Given: 952
Why were they saying tonight’s landing was going to be the most challenging to date? Once on the drone ship the seas seemed very calm and skies looked clear?

They were talking about reentry and not landing per se. Weather was not cooperating but they have landed boosters on far worse weather conditions. However a hotter reentry environment would explain why they talked about "hottest reentry" ever.

Remember landing =/= reentry

And that's why the entire process is usually called EDL: Entry, Descent and Landing.

Offline jcm

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3701
  • Jonathan McDowell
  • Somerville, Massachusetts, USA
    • Jonathan's Space Report
  • Liked: 1403
  • Likes Given: 816
I get an apogee of 69,200 km.  Cutoff at 36423 km/hr, altitude 221 km, in the rotating earth reference frame (since speed was 0 at launch).  So assuming 27 degree inclination, we vector add the Earth's rotational speed to get 10547 m/s in inertial frame.   And if you are going that speed at 221 km, your apogee will be 69,200 km.

Confirmed, TLEs show 69036 km apogee.
-----------------------------

Jonathan McDowell
http://planet4589.org

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12419
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10147
  • Likes Given: 8485
NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine comments in this press release doesn't even mentioned SpaceX...SAD!.  ::)
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline MechE31

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • MELBOURNE, FL
  • Liked: 284
  • Likes Given: 1
The ablative shield previously known as engine? Another great euphemism, ad-hoc ablative.

I'd worry more about the parts that don't get intentionally and repeatedly lit on fire.

Take away fuel film cooling on the engines and you might be surprised...

Online LouScheffer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3452
  • Liked: 6263
  • Likes Given: 882
I get an apogee of 69,200 km.  Cutoff at 36423 km/hr, altitude 221 km, in the rotating earth reference frame (since speed was 0 at launch).  So assuming 27 degree inclination, we vector add the Earth's rotational speed to get 10547 m/s in inertial frame.   And if you are going that speed at 221 km, your apogee will be 69,200 km.

Confirmed, TLEs show 69036 km apogee.
I get about 1615 m/s deficit to get to GEO.

Offline haywoodfloyd

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 664
  • Ottawa, Ontario CANADA
  • Liked: 199
  • Likes Given: 23
Forbes is already playing the lunar angle

https://www.forbes.com/sites/elizabethhowell1/2019/02/21/lunar-launch-boosts-spacex-into-new-sphere-of-business/#92d3c5616b63

Quote
Lunar Launch Boosts SpaceX Into New Sphere of Business
>

Good article but it's too bad that she forgot to include China in the list of countries that have landed on the moon.

Offline soltasto

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 636
  • Italy, Earth
  • Liked: 1119
  • Likes Given: 40
I get an apogee of 69,200 km.  Cutoff at 36423 km/hr, altitude 221 km, in the rotating earth reference frame (since speed was 0 at launch).  So assuming 27 degree inclination, we vector add the Earth's rotational speed to get 10547 m/s in inertial frame.   And if you are going that speed at 221 km, your apogee will be 69,200 km.

Confirmed, TLEs show 69036 km apogee.
I get about 1615 m/s deficit to get to GEO.

I get similar numbers too, in particular:

2019-009A/44048 in 260 x 69036 km x 27.55° -> GTO-1605
2019-009B/44049 in 242 x 68845 km x 27.56° -> GTO-1606
2019-009C/44050 in 256 x 68808 km x 27.60° -> GTO-1606

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
Just out of interest, if SpaceIL had the money to buy lone payload status, could the Falcon-9 have sent Beresheet on to any kind of lunar transfer orbit without needing further apogee increasing burns?
« Last Edit: 02/22/2019 01:46 pm by Ben the Space Brit »
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13469
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11869
  • Likes Given: 11115
NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine comments in this press release doesn't even mentioned SpaceX...SAD!.  ::)
Maybe no mention because  SpaceX was just the ride? In that case, it's progress? But who knows .
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8166
  • Liked: 6836
  • Likes Given: 2972
Just out of interest, if SpaceIL had the money to buy lone payload status, could the Falcon-9 have sent Beresheet on to any kind of lunar transfer orbit without needing further apogee increasing burns?

Yes. According to LSP's website, F9 can send 1865 kg to TLI (C3 of -1.1 km2/s2) and still RTLS the booster. Beresheet is only 600 kg.

Online ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8494
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2103
How did Nusantara Satu’s mass change from 4,735 kilograms to 4,100 kilograms?

I thought that the source where I got the first mass reading (Gunter’s Space Page) was right.
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline PM3

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1527
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1892
  • Likes Given: 1354
How did Nusantara Satu’s mass change from 4,735 kilograms to 4,100 kilograms?

I thought that the source where I got the first mass reading (Gunter’s Space Page) was right.

4.735 kg is about the total payload mass of Nusantara Satu + Beresheet + S5. This number was listed on the PSN website: https://web.archive.org/web/20190114044351/https://psn.co.id/nsatu/

Meanwhile they fixed that.
"Never, never be afraid of the truth." -- Jim Bridenstine

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
How did Nusantara Satu’s mass change from 4,735 kilograms to 4,100 kilograms?

I thought that the source where I got the first mass reading (Gunter’s Space Page) was right.

Gunter is not omniscient (although it may seem so at times.)  Sometimes his numbers can be estimates or just outdated, or as has been mentioned in this case maybe the meaning of the initial numbers was unclear.  If you're ever poking around for information and find something recent that contradicts Gunter's info you can send him a link, he's "Skyrocket" on this forum.
« Last Edit: 02/22/2019 03:40 pm by gongora »

Offline punder

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Liked: 1858
  • Likes Given: 1472
Some beautiful shots from this launch. Loved the fireworks. Looking forward to landing footage. Good luck to Beresheet!

Is this where I can congratulate SpaceX, SpaceIL, Israel, PSN, USAF, and did I mention SpaceX?  :)

Offline mn

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1116
  • United States
  • Liked: 1006
  • Likes Given: 367
Perhaps we should have separate post launch mission threads for each payload?

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0