Author Topic: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities  (Read 21213 times)

Offline StuffOfInterest

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 411
  • Just interested in space
  • McLean, Virginia, USA
  • Liked: 129
  • Likes Given: 60
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #40 on: 10/27/2017 06:27 PM »
FWIW the document indicates no significant harrassment of marine mammals from ASDS landings.  So even if landings are limited during harbor pup season, it would only be RTLS that would be affected. The core wouldn't be expended.

Yeah, the harassment occurs mainly to animals that are on the beach and scared into the water by the sonic booms and landing burn noise.

I thought the harassment was mainly in the form of capturing seals, strapping them to boards, putting headphones on them, and playing boom sounds to see how they react.
« Last Edit: 10/27/2017 06:29 PM by StuffOfInterest »

Offline Jdeshetler

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 623
  • Silicon Valley, CA
  • Liked: 1958
  • Likes Given: 1367
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #41 on: 10/28/2017 05:42 AM »
During our remote camera setup next to the Iridium launch pad two weeks ago, we noticed a team down the slope, setting up 6 microphones stands.

Not sure if this is part of ongoing sound data collection for RSTL...

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5267
  • Viewed launches since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 1914
  • Likes Given: 1298
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #42 on: 10/28/2017 05:53 AM »
During our remote camera setup next to the Iridium launch pad two weeks ago, we noticed a team down the slope, setting up 6 microphones stands.

Not sure if this is part of ongoing sound data collection for RSTL...

maybe similar to this project a few years back:  http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/permits/vafb_report.pdf
Tony De La Rosa

Offline deruch

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2188
  • California
  • Liked: 1693
  • Likes Given: 3400
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #43 on: 10/28/2017 07:07 AM »
During our remote camera setup next to the Iridium launch pad two weeks ago, we noticed a team down the slope, setting up 6 microphones stands.

Not sure if this is part of ongoing sound data collection for RSTL...

Part of the harassment grant is that SpaceX is required to undertake certain monitoring actions during launch campaigns (this  is in addition to mitigation various efforts).  The grant lays out all the stuff they have to do.
Shouldn't reality posts be in "Advanced concepts"?  --Nomadd

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6106
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 5553
  • Likes Given: 1571
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #44 on: 12/21/2017 11:23 AM »
VAFB have just posted findings of no significant impact for SpaceX landing boosters at VAFB (attached). The  FONSI assessment is dated April 2016, with a supplemental Iridium update dated September 2016.

I tried searching the forum to see if they've been posted before, but didn't find them. Apologies if these are here and I missed them!

Edit to clarify: the Iridium supplemental EA appears to relate to the area where boosters on Iridium missions would land on ASDS, if a land landing were not possible.
« Last Edit: 12/21/2017 11:39 AM by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6106
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 5553
  • Likes Given: 1571
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #45 on: 12/22/2017 06:36 AM »
Nice photo from Shorealone Films flickr shots prior to the Iridium 3 launch

And here’s their shot prior to the Iridium 4 launch, no real change.

Offline hootowls

  • Member
  • Posts: 41
  • Liked: 26
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #46 on: 01/03/2018 08:22 PM »
VAFB have just posted findings of no significant impact for SpaceX landing boosters at VAFB (attached). The  FONSI assessment is dated April 2016, with a supplemental Iridium update dated September 2016.

Good catch on the posting!  The public comment period on the final draft SEA/FONSI closes out on 21 Jan 2018.

Offline pospa

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 144
  • Pardubice, CZ
  • Liked: 120
  • Likes Given: 452
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #47 on: 05/28/2018 12:07 PM »
Dear NSF photoreporters, do you have any publicly available hi-res pictures of SLC-4W langing pad from the latest lauch of F9 / Iridium-6 & Grace-FO that you could share with us and document the current status in May 2018?
« Last Edit: 05/28/2018 12:23 PM by pospa »

Offline ChrisC

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1496
  • Liked: 357
  • Likes Given: 401
Re: SpaceX VAFB landing facilities
« Reply #48 on: 05/28/2018 04:23 PM »
Look in the public thread for that mission, and if you don't find what you want, subscribe to L2 because I know we have some excellent high res shots somewhere here.
« Last Edit: 05/28/2018 04:24 PM by ChrisC »
How to embed photos from outside sources (e.g. Twitter)
NASA TV in HD:  history and FAQ (from 2007-2010 startup period)

Tags: