Jim Cantrell, a quiet force behind the new U.S. space industry, is on the verge of an orbital launch with his small satellite launch company, Vector. Here he delves into the past and future of the space industry, as only a veteran who has Forest Gump-ed his way through aerospace history can do.
On the verge of an orbital launch? I'd like to believe so, but their progress seem to suggest otherwise.
Quote from: Lars-J on 11/09/2018 05:36 amOn the verge of an orbital launch? I'd like to believe so, but their progress seem to suggest otherwise.Well, I'd give them some marks for aiming high. After all, they wouldn't be the only ones out there subscribing to the spin that "sub-orbital" is simply sub-optimal "orbital".. and oh-so-close, maybe-next-time.
Quote from: CameronD on 11/11/2018 09:51 pmQuote from: Lars-J on 11/09/2018 05:36 amOn the verge of an orbital launch? I'd like to believe so, but their progress seem to suggest otherwise.Well, I'd give them some marks for aiming high. After all, they wouldn't be the only ones out there subscribing to the spin that "sub-orbital" is simply sub-optimal "orbital".. and oh-so-close, maybe-next-time. Oh they would get plenty more credibility if they were suborbital (as in space but suborbital) - what is their current max altitude? A few km?
Quote from: Lars-J on 11/11/2018 10:13 pmQuote from: CameronD on 11/11/2018 09:51 pmQuote from: Lars-J on 11/09/2018 05:36 amOn the verge of an orbital launch? I'd like to believe so, but their progress seem to suggest otherwise.Well, I'd give them some marks for aiming high. After all, they wouldn't be the only ones out there subscribing to the spin that "sub-orbital" is simply sub-optimal "orbital".. and oh-so-close, maybe-next-time. Oh they would get plenty more credibility if they were suborbital (as in space but suborbital) - what is their current max altitude? A few km? Sub-optimal sub-orbital then. Any lower and they wouldn't leave the launch tower. I'll have to remember that one next time I get in a commercial airliner.
The proposed launch site will be Randsburg, CA at the Friends of Amateur Rocketry (FAR) launch complex, which is located at 35.348°N, -117.810°W, and is situated at an altitude of 1050 m. The B0.003 launch vehicle will not exceed 10000 ft (3048 m) above the launch site and will not travel further than 5km away from the launch site.For this application we would like to submit approval for the following range of dates; December 17th, 2018 to June 1st, 2019. However, the planned launch date for Vector-R B0.003 is targeted for midJanuary 2019 from Randsburg, CA.
2036-EX-ST-2018The proposed launch site will be Randsburg, CA at the Friends of Amateur Rocketry (FAR) launch complex, which is located at 35.348°N, -117.810°W, and is situated at an altitude of 1050 m. The B0.003 launch vehicle will not exceed 10000 ft (3048 m) above the launch site and will not travel further than 5km away from the launch site.
Is it factual to call it a "launch vehicle" if it doesn't go above 3km? What are they launching?
And without being overly negative, it;s fair to compare this to amateurs like Copenhagen Suborbitals who go to 10km-12km on a shoestring, without burning tens of millions of dollars
Some recent images of our Vector-R B1001 vehicle coming together in the @vectorspacesys Huntington Beach facility. This vehicle will be our first one to space launched from Kodiak Island Alaska in Q1 2019. Its coming along nicely !
We also got a look at the second stage engine:https://twitter.com/jamesncantrell/status/1078805444754321408
Quote from: gongora on 12/06/2018 12:04 am2036-EX-ST-2018The proposed launch site will be Randsburg, CA at the Friends of Amateur Rocketry (FAR) launch complex, which is located at 35.348°N, -117.810°W, and is situated at an altitude of 1050 m. The B0.003 launch vehicle will not exceed 10000 ft (3048 m) above the launch site and will not travel further than 5km away from the launch site.Is it factual to call it a "launch vehicle" if it doesn't go above 3km? What are they launching? And without being overly negative, it;s fair to compare this to amateurs like Copenhagen Suborbitals who go to 10km-12km on a shoestring, without burning tens of millions of dollars:-https://copenhagensuborbitals.com/the-full-story-of-the-nexo-ii-mission-august-2018/
Throughout 2019, Vector will ramp up testing of critical elements of the Vector-R launch vehicle, leading up to its inaugural orbital launch.
Here we see some elements of the truth. They are not going to orbit any time soon. The Q1 launch will be a suborbital flight - they call it "space" like Virgin Galactic calls the 80km line "space".
Quote from: ringsider on 01/12/2019 06:19 amHere we see some elements of the truth. They are not going to orbit any time soon. The Q1 launch will be a suborbital flight - they call it "space" like Virgin Galactic calls the 80km line "space".It'd be impressive if they did. You can count the number of teams who have reached space with their own in-house liquid propellant engines on one hand. I can't think of one that has done it with a methane engine...
Quote from: QuantumG on 01/13/2019 11:34 amQuote from: ringsider on 01/12/2019 06:19 amHere we see some elements of the truth. They are not going to orbit any time soon. The Q1 launch will be a suborbital flight - they call it "space" like Virgin Galactic calls the 80km line "space".It'd be impressive if they did. You can count the number of teams who have reached space with their own in-house liquid propellant engines on one hand. I can't think of one that has done it with a methane engine...Their propellant is Propylene/Lox.The engines at least resemble the engines Microcosm designed for their Scorpius Launch vehicles, there might . They are using pressurefed engines and have been testing 3d printed injectors for quite some time.I really don't know what's holding them back so far, my guess would be avionics...