Author Topic: Vector Launch (formerly Vector Space Systems)  (Read 413107 times)

Online CameronD

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2429
  • Melbourne, Australia
    • Norton Consultants
  • Liked: 901
  • Likes Given: 564
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #640 on: 11/16/2017 09:55 pm »
Does anyone have any idea what are they testing actually? Or is this just a photo op?

Dunno for certain, but there's a number of things they could be testing:
1. Structural support and logistics for raising and lowering at the pad.
2. Testing their tank pressurisation and instrumentation
3. Checking that the boiloff valves actually work in the vertical (and don't just freeze solid)
4. Testing their coolness factor...  :P
« Last Edit: 11/16/2017 09:56 pm by CameronD »
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine - however, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are
going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5152
  • Liked: 1003
  • Likes Given: 342
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #641 on: 11/16/2017 10:45 pm »
Does anyone have any idea what are they testing actually? Or is this just a photo op?

Dunno for certain, but there's a number of things they could be testing:
1. Structural support and logistics for raising and lowering at the pad.
2. Testing their tank pressurisation and instrumentation
3. Checking that the boiloff valves actually work in the vertical (and don't just freeze solid)
4. Testing their coolness factor...  :P


5. Check to see how many nuts corrode on the thing
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #642 on: 11/17/2017 06:20 am »
Interesting, Vector is testing at Vandenberg!
https://twitter.com/vectorspacesys/status/931222922735132672


location here: VAFB SLC-8

Quote
It was originally part of the California Spaceport, and was known as the Commercial Launch Facility (CLF) or Space Launch Facility (SLF).

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandenberg_AFB_Space_Launch_Complex_8
« Last Edit: 11/17/2017 06:22 am by catdlr »
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #643 on: 11/17/2017 06:22 pm »
Quote
The @vectorspacesys factory taking shape in Tucson.  Stay tuned as we begin Block 1 vehicle production.  First orbital launch mid 2018 !

https://twitter.com/jamesncantrell/status/931515096664236032

Edit to add:

Quote
So you're planning on going from a bare factory to a flight vehicle in only ~7mos? Doesn't that seem at least a little optimistic to you?
https://twitter.com/rocketrepreneur/status/931591272908840960

 ???
« Last Edit: 11/17/2017 06:23 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #644 on: 11/17/2017 06:44 pm »
A reply to Jon’s question:

Quote
Nope, its only a optimistic for old aerospace -- its all in a days work for new space. "I'm not asking you to believe me. I'm asking you to watch me'" - Vector CEO @jamesncantrell

https://twitter.com/vectorspacesys/status/931608328131588096

Not long to find out.

Edit to add:

Quote
Its a new factory for high rate production.  We have been in the existing space down the street for about 2 years.  Aren't you a bit pessimistic ?

https://twitter.com/jamesncantrell/status/931610477070659585
« Last Edit: 11/17/2017 07:03 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline TrevorMonty

Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #645 on: 11/17/2017 07:21 pm »
Given usual schedule shifts to right for this industry, I'd say Jon's pessimism is well founded. Here's hoping Vector hit their optimistic schedule but I wouldn't put much money on it.

Online Davidthefat

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 464
  • Rockets are life.
  • Greater Los Angeles Area, California
  • Liked: 288
  • Likes Given: 71
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #646 on: 11/17/2017 07:28 pm »
I think "orbital" is the one that raises most doubt.


Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6828
  • Lafayette/Broomfield, CO
  • Liked: 4046
  • Likes Given: 1741
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #647 on: 11/17/2017 10:50 pm »
A reply to Jon’s question:

Quote
Nope, its only a optimistic for old aerospace -- its all in a days work for new space. "I'm not asking you to believe me. I'm asking you to watch me'" - Vector CEO @jamesncantrell

https://twitter.com/vectorspacesys/status/931608328131588096

Not long to find out.

Edit to add:

Quote
Its a new factory for high rate production.  We have been in the existing space down the street for about 2 years.  Aren't you a bit pessimistic ?

https://twitter.com/jamesncantrell/status/931610477070659585

I would reply, but apparently Jim blocked me...

Oh, and it was pretty funny being "NewSpace-splained" by whoever runs Vectors twitter account...

~Jon
« Last Edit: 11/17/2017 10:52 pm by jongoff »

Offline vaporcobra

Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #648 on: 11/17/2017 11:59 pm »
A reply to Jon’s question:

Quote
Nope, its only a optimistic for old aerospace -- its all in a days work for new space. "I'm not asking you to believe me. I'm asking you to watch me'" - Vector CEO @jamesncantrell

https://twitter.com/vectorspacesys/status/931608328131588096

Not long to find out.

Edit to add:

Quote
Its a new factory for high rate production.  We have been in the existing space down the street for about 2 years.  Aren't you a bit pessimistic ?

https://twitter.com/jamesncantrell/status/931610477070659585

I would reply, but apparently Jim blocked me...

Oh, and it was pretty funny being "NewSpace-splained" by whoever runs Vectors twitter account...

~Jon

Now THAT'S more like the Cantrell I know and am deeply ambivalent about...

Offline ringsider

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Liked: 508
  • Likes Given: 98
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #649 on: 11/18/2017 06:06 am »
A reply to Jon’s question:

Quote
Nope, its only a optimistic for old aerospace -- its all in a days work for new space. "I'm not asking you to believe me. I'm asking you to watch me'" - Vector CEO @jamesncantrell

https://twitter.com/vectorspacesys/status/931608328131588096

Not long to find out.

Edit to add:

Quote
Its a new factory for high rate production.  We have been in the existing space down the street for about 2 years.  Aren't you a bit pessimistic ?

https://twitter.com/jamesncantrell/status/931610477070659585

I would reply, but apparently Jim blocked me...

Oh, and it was pretty funny being "NewSpace-splained" by whoever runs Vectors twitter account...

~Jon

Now THAT'S more like the Cantrell I know and am deeply ambivalent about...
There is going to be a hubris moment.

They are out of their depth and even from outside you can see the community is turning against them.

Seriously, what have they done that is in any way better or more sophisticated than the Nexo rocket of Copenhagen Suborbitals?
« Last Edit: 11/18/2017 06:07 am by ringsider »

Online Davidthefat

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 464
  • Rockets are life.
  • Greater Los Angeles Area, California
  • Liked: 288
  • Likes Given: 71
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #650 on: 11/18/2017 06:25 am »

Seriously, what have they done that is in any way better or more sophisticated than the Nexo rocket of Copenhagen Suborbitals?


Raising money.

Offline ringsider

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Liked: 508
  • Likes Given: 98
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #651 on: 11/18/2017 06:51 am »

Seriously, what have they done that is in any way better or more sophisticated than the Nexo rocket of Copenhagen Suborbitals?


Raising money.
Pshaw. The Copenhagen guys are amateurs living on donations and they are doing a far better job than Vector technically. It's embarrassing that Vector raised several million and can't even get above the cloud base or steer the vehicle.

Copenhagen Suborbitals have produced a rocket that is streets ahead of that Vector pile of bolts - thrust vectoring, dynamic pressure regulation, actual inertial GNC control, 3D printed engines, spark ignition, telemetry....  take a look at Nexo:-

https://copenhagensuborbitals.com/roadmap/nexo-i/

https://copenhagensuborbitals.com/roadmap/nexo-ii/

Vector might have got a commitment from those VCs but that cash comes with constraints and milestones - the VCs will only pay them against progress, not in one lump at the front. That's why they moved into what looks like a rundown industrial unit instead of pursuing the world headquarters RFP (that they don't want anybody to read.)
« Last Edit: 11/18/2017 07:10 am by ringsider »

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #652 on: 11/18/2017 08:01 am »
Did you just unironically say "streets ahead"? :P
Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline ringsider

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Liked: 508
  • Likes Given: 98
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #653 on: 11/18/2017 08:07 am »
Did you just unironically say "streets ahead"? :P

Are you also a Community fan?

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5152
  • Liked: 1003
  • Likes Given: 342
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #654 on: 11/19/2017 04:48 pm »

Seriously, what have they done that is in any way better or more sophisticated than the Nexo rocket of Copenhagen Suborbitals?


Raising money.
Also, actually hired a bunch of people for the job.
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Offline ringsider

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Liked: 508
  • Likes Given: 98
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #655 on: 11/19/2017 06:42 pm »

Seriously, what have they done that is in any way better or more sophisticated than the Nexo rocket of Copenhagen Suborbitals?


Raising money.
Also, actually hired a bunch of people for the job.
In other words raised and spent a lot of money. Great. But what did that get them? Have they demo'd a vehicle realistically capable of orbiting the Earth? Not even close.
« Last Edit: 11/19/2017 06:43 pm by ringsider »

Offline savuporo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5152
  • Liked: 1003
  • Likes Given: 342
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #656 on: 11/19/2017 07:06 pm »

Seriously, what have they done that is in any way better or more sophisticated than the Nexo rocket of Copenhagen Suborbitals?


Raising money.
Also, actually hired a bunch of people for the job.
In other words raised and spent a lot of money. Great. But what did that get them? Have they demo'd a vehicle realistically capable of orbiting the Earth? Not even close.


This is getting a little tiresome. Orbital Sciences Pegasus, SpaceX Falcon 1 and Rocket Lab Electron didn't demo a vehicle realistically capable of orbiting earth until they did, either.  They all did meet the prerequisites of raising and spending funding, lining up facilities and people to work on that very problem, though - which in itself is no guarantee of eventual success though, of course.

I'm not sure what the incessant bashing without any substance adds to the thread, though ?
Orion - the first and only manned not-too-deep-space craft

Offline Rabidpanda

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 532
  • Liked: 123
  • Likes Given: 572
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #657 on: 11/19/2017 09:01 pm »

Seriously, what have they done that is in any way better or more sophisticated than the Nexo rocket of Copenhagen Suborbitals?


Raising money.
Also, actually hired a bunch of people for the job.
In other words raised and spent a lot of money. Great. But what did that get them? Have they demo'd a vehicle realistically capable of orbiting the Earth? Not even close.

These things take time, it's not like you can drop some cash and suddenly have a completed launch vehicle in a few months.

Offline ringsider

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Liked: 508
  • Likes Given: 98
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #658 on: 11/19/2017 09:08 pm »
These things take time, it's not like you can drop some cash and suddenly have a completed launch vehicle in a few months.

It's not me claiming they will have it done in 7 MONTHS, it's the CEO.

Offline Rabidpanda

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 532
  • Liked: 123
  • Likes Given: 572
Re: Vector Space Systems
« Reply #659 on: 11/19/2017 09:34 pm »
These things take time, it's not like you can drop some cash and suddenly have a completed launch vehicle in a few months.

It's not me claiming they will have it done in 7 MONTHS, it's the CEO.

I completely agree, that is ridiculous. I can't tell if Cantrell is blinded by optimism or being intentionally misleading.

My post was disagreeing with your assertion that they should have something to show for all the money the've raised / people they've hired and your comparison of them to amateur groups that have been around much longer.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0