http://www.vulture.com/2016/12/ryan-gosling-damien-chazelle-reteam-for-neil-armstrong-biopic.html
Quote from: JAFO on 12/29/2016 07:37 pmhttp://www.vulture.com/2016/12/ryan-gosling-damien-chazelle-reteam-for-neil-armstrong-biopic.htmlI started a thread on this a while back...http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=38895.0
Quote from: Rocket Science on 12/29/2016 08:01 pmQuote from: JAFO on 12/29/2016 07:37 pmhttp://www.vulture.com/2016/12/ryan-gosling-damien-chazelle-reteam-for-neil-armstrong-biopic.htmlI started a thread on this a while back...http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=38895.0D'oh! I missed it, apologies. :cheers:
Looks less like Apollo 13 and more like Gravity to me.
Quote from: Orbiter on 06/09/2018 01:44 amLooks less like Apollo 13 and more like Gravity to me.A few years ago I went to a presentation at EAA AirVenture that featured Jim Lovell and Fred Haise talking about Apollo 13. They explained the liberties Ron Howard took with the truth to make the movie more dramatic. I suspect that this movie may take even more liberties with the truth. Apollo 13 didn't need the truth stretched. Reality was dramatic enough. This story if told right, shouldn't need the truth stretched either.
Also, compared to Apollo 13, Apollo 11 was obviously much more tame. Off the top of my head the only issues I can think of in or related to the mission are:
Also, compared to Apollo 13, Apollo 11 was obviously much more tame.