Author Topic: ULA + CISLunar1000 roadmap  (Read 52178 times)

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6214
  • Lafayette/Broomfield, CO
  • Liked: 2356
  • Likes Given: 790
Re: ULA + CISLunar1000 roadmap
« Reply #140 on: 05/02/2018 11:22 PM »
Quote
Welcoming by @torybruno to the lunar mining camp design workshop today at @ulalaunch. The big sheet on the table is a master plan for moving civilization beyond Earth! (That's the ultimate goal, IMO.) 😀 Excited to be here.

https://twitter.com/DrPhiltill/status/991321547829927936

That's me at the far table straight ahead of the camera... It was a fun meeting. Some good ideas there, though a lot of work between here and there. It was fun getting some of my crazy ideas out there.

~Jon

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6862
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 6768
  • Likes Given: 2109


Offline A_M_Swallow

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8539
  • South coast of England
  • Liked: 362
  • Likes Given: 158
Re: ULA + CISLunar1000 roadmap
« Reply #143 on: 11/04/2018 09:49 AM »
{snip}
https://twitter.com/rocketrepreneur/status/1058843762313486337

The SLS may get you and your cargo to lunar orbit but you still need a lander. The mighty Saturn V could only deliver a light weight lander, the LEM, which had a payload capacity similar to that of a family car. The heavy modules needed to make habitats. manned rovers and industrial machinery will require much bigger landers.

Reducing the price of a SLS delivery of lander fuel from a billion dollars to half a billion just means that the ISRU propellant has to cost less than half a billion to make. I suspect the break even point is around the point at which the propellant made weighs more than the mass of the machinery needed to mine and refine the propellant.

Tags: