So, the LV will be 65metres tall. The earlier figure discussed here was 55m. I would love to see the commonality between this and the ULV.
As far as I see this there are 2 prospective families (with a lot in common)
ULV - payload capacity of PSLV, GSLV and LVM3 ie upto 4 tons to GTO
HLV - 6 tons and 10 tons to GTO
They might as well be the same for all we know. But 10 tons of GTP payload and ISRO's insistance on solid boosters for this, will result in the requirement of higher propellant loading in semi cryo stage and the use of CE60 on the upper stage which will result in a different vehicle from the baseline ULV specs.
ISRO chief on prospective HLV designs after the advent of Falcon Heavy
Bottom line: They have designs based on clustered Kerolox engines (SCE-200) in the drawing board. But its a long way off. Current emphasis is on realizing SCE-200 engine and the subsequent development of single engine SC200 stage to enhance the capability of GSLV MkIII.
One at a time. Application of advanced technologies to real problem of man and society, the priority already defined.
If isro plans to undertake manned spaceflight in the long term then they should definitely be looking at a super heavy launcher. China, Russia and the US are all working on their own super heavy launchers which will be ready in 2025-2030 timeframe. ISRO will need a super heavy launcher if they want to play any meaningful role in lunar/mars exploration.
They should go for reusability first, so that even a heavy launcher wouldn't have to be thrown away.
ISRO HLV (Heavy-lift Launch Vehicle) configuration studies [Aug 11, 2021].