What changes have been implemented in the integration of Soyuz-2.1a in the light of the last failure?
About the Progress-MS from the TV Studio of Roscosmos.
Which are the CubeSats shown in the first half of the video? I think I understood that they will be used for Earth observation, but my Russian is quite rusty nowadays.
was a rollout video available?
Anyone else take note of the ice(?) cloud the Progress was in? Seen in the KURS camera.
MCC-H. One screen is showing Progress telemetry.
Any idea of the liftoff mass of Progress MS with its 2,610 kg cargo?
Clear skies here in the East Midlands, UK and a couple of ISS visible passes due this evening. Any ideas where Progress is in relation to the ISS?
First communication session with TsUP via Luch-5B was made 10 minutes after separation from launcher Soyuz-2.1a !http://tass.ru/kosmos/2546723
Gotta love the Russian spin. "For the first time in history" applies solely to the Progress and Soyuz vehicles
Quote from: the_other_Doug on 12/22/2015 01:32 pmGotta love the Russian spin. "For the first time in history" applies solely to the Progress and Soyuz vehiclesThere is no Russian spin at all. Please, read closely RSC Energia press-release. "On Monday, December 21, RSC Energia specialists for the first time in the history of operation of the cargo and crew transportation spacecraft of Progress and Soyuz type ran a communications session with the new-series spacecraft Progress MS via a relay satellite". The same words in Russian variant of press-release. "В понедельник, 21 декабря, специалисты РКК "Энергия" впервые в истории эксплуатации транспортных грузовых и пилотируемых кораблей типа "Прогресс" и "Союз" провели сеанс связи с кораблем новой модификации "Прогресс МС" через спутник-ретранслятор".
This is from the ISS DPC that is currently in progress: Progress performance is nominal except for the TORU command test, no joy on that. Going to try again just before the actual rendezvous. Nothing else noted.
KURS retract
Quote from: Chris Bergin on 12/23/2015 09:25 amKURS retractBy the way, there is nothing to retract on Progress MS.
Quote from: DaveS on 12/23/2015 06:41 amThis is from the ISS DPC that is currently in progress: Progress performance is nominal except for the TORU command test, no joy on that. Going to try again just before the actual rendezvous. Nothing else noted.This is now a solid NO-GO. No "plan B" in the event of a KURS-NA failure.
Last Night 6 PM local time Nevada sky's were filled with the burn up of the stage.Going to list a couple. Mods move to another place if this is wrong.http://www.lasvegasnow.com/news/unidentified-flying-object-seen-in-vegas-skyWhole page of videoshttp://www.news3lv.com/content/news/story/Meteor-or-space-debris-flies-across-Las-Vegas-sky/ususXSke3Eu4HS2g-lTZKQ.cspxhttp://www.fox5vegas.com/story/30815687/object-seen-streaking-across-las-vegas-skyhttp://www.reviewjournal.com/news/las-vegas/reports-streak-light-was-likely-debris-russian-rocket
There are reports and video of sightings from the U.S. west coast of the re-entry of 2015-080B / 41178, on 2015 Dec 23, near 02:10 UTC. It was the rocket body of the recent launch of Progress MS-01. It was the model 11S510, which has an empty mass of 2410 kg.
was this indeed a violation of procedures to proceed without TORU functional as back-up?
old legacy antennas need retracting, correct???
The Cosmonauts are practicing the movement using a computer simulation. One of them mentioned he was measuring distance using "ruler". Not a graphic display ruler, an actual physical ruler, in millimeters. Not exactly high-tech or state of the art.
Quote from: Targeteer on 06/27/2016 10:04 amThe Cosmonauts are practicing the movement using a computer simulation. One of them mentioned he was measuring distance using "ruler". Not a graphic display ruler, an actual physical ruler, in millimeters. Not exactly high-tech or state of the art.If it works then don't knock it!! Remember al the $millions spent by NASA to develop a "space pen" when the Russians just used a pencil ............
(sorry for forgetting to cover this live, but I remembered the wrong time for this test )
Quote from: Galactic Penguin SST on 07/01/2016 07:10 am(sorry for forgetting to cover this live, but I remembered the wrong time for this test ) Well that swinging after capture is something I've never seen before. But other than Okan, no one seems to be mentioning any issue with it?
Came in at a slightly different angle then fired thrusters quite a bit before gradually swinging back into alignment after contact. Controllers mentioned a "mishap at contact" while re-capping with the crew that they'll be looking into the root cause of. Everything seems to be latching fine though.(gif by Novasilisko)
ISS Daily Summary Report 06/22/1662P Thruster Test: Russian ground teams performed a thruster test on 62P. However, only the X axis thrusters fired, the Z and Y axis thrusters did not. Ground teams are investigating, and a re-test of the thrusters is expected on June 27. Following the 62P thruster test, Moscow experienced issues reintegrating the Progress into the control loop. The maneuver back to the Torque Equalibrium Attitude (TEA) was subsequently performed using thruster configuration SM411. Thruster configuration will remain SM411 until Moscow has a forward plan for reintegrating the Nadir Progress. In the meantime, a 62P prop purge is planned for tomorrow.
Still "Nothing to see here":http://www.roscosmos.ru/22392/
This is from the Expedition 48 update thread:QuoteISS Daily Summary Report 06/22/1662P Thruster Test: Russian ground teams performed a thruster test on 62P. However, only the X axis thrusters fired, the Z and Y axis thrusters did not. Ground teams are investigating, and a re-test of the thrusters is expected on June 27. Following the 62P thruster test, Moscow experienced issues reintegrating the Progress into the control loop. The maneuver back to the Torque Equalibrium Attitude (TEA) was subsequently performed using thruster configuration SM411. Thruster configuration will remain SM411 until Moscow has a forward plan for reintegrating the Nadir Progress. In the meantime, a 62P prop purge is planned for tomorrow.
One speculation I could add is that, when the probe hit the cone, which always causes a change in attitude since the probe rarely hits the cone exactly head-on, perhaps the Progress tried to correct for this attitude change without being aware that contact had already been achieved? Or something along those lines?
Undocking is planned at 3:48 UTC on Sunday/11:48 pm EDT on Saturday night
Will future Progress-MS flights be grounded for a while due to the unexpected thruster firings that Progress MS-01 went through?