Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 FT - ORBCOMM-2 - Dec. 21, 2015 (Return To Flight) DISCUSSION  (Read 1360693 times)

Offline Baranquilla

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 107
  • Working for a Space Agency in Europe
  • 🇪🇺
  • Liked: 144
  • Likes Given: 90
I remember reading last year that the aluminium came from the Netherlands.. Took me long enough to find it back:

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/spacex-wont-win-the-governments-launch-contracts-without-a-fight

Still doesn't exclude that they bought anything at that other company..
Because it's there - George Mallory

Offline iamlucky13

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1659
  • Liked: 112
  • Likes Given: 95
I remember reading last year that the aluminium came from the Netherlands.. Took me long enough to find it back:

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/spacex-wont-win-the-governments-launch-contracts-without-a-fight

Still doesn't exclude that they bought anything at that other company..

As I understood it, the struts came as a finished component from a separate supplier. So unless SpaceX mandates that all their suppliers use the same material supplier, it's not clear whether that is relevant.

Offline mfck

  • Office Plankton Representative
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 543
  • Israel
  • Liked: 254
  • Likes Given: 222


I remember reading last year that the aluminium came from the Netherlands.. Took me long enough to find it back:

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/spacex-wont-win-the-governments-launch-contracts-without-a-fight

Still doesn't exclude that they bought anything at that other company..

As I understood it, the struts came as a finished component from a separate supplier. So unless SpaceX mandates that all their suppliers use the same material supplier, it's not clear whether that is relevant.

I would add to that, that struts are hardly made of aluminium

Offline LastStarFighter

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 234
  • Europa
  • Liked: 77
  • Likes Given: 11


SpaceX gets their aluminum from a French company named Alcan I beleive.

I have no idea if that is true that SpaceX gets it's aluminum from Alcan, but Alcan was a Canadian company originally but it is now owned by the Australian mining/resource conglomerate Rio Tinto.

In the House Armed Services Committee meeting on Assured Access to Space (March 17, 2015) Shotwell was asked about their aluminum and avionics components being made in foreign countries. Shotwell said they get their aluminum (I beleive the rolled Al-Li) from a foreign company Constellium (formerly Alcan). Their rolled aluminum is made in France. Not sure where the avionics components they speak of come from.

Offline allins

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Ontario, Canada
  • Liked: 46
  • Likes Given: 209
Boy, Alcan is getting their name used (good and bad!) lately.  Constellium was never Alcan.
 

Offline rickyramjet

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 114
  • Killeen, TX
  • Liked: 106
  • Likes Given: 80
SpaceX struts are made of steel.  And aluminum sources are not an issue with RTF anyway.

Offline dorkmo

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 711
  • Liked: 339
  • Likes Given: 848
Boy, Alcan is getting their name used (good and bad!) lately.  Constellium was never Alcan.

not sure how much this really matters but according to wikipedia
"Alcan was purchased by Australian/European multinational Rio Tinto for $38 billion in 2007"

Constellium "was created when Rio Tinto sold off Alcan Engineered Products to Apollo Management (51%) and FSI (10%) in 2011."

Offline jacqmans

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21808
  • Houten, The Netherlands
  • Liked: 8704
  • Likes Given: 321
There is a post here on facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/spacexgroup/

Keith Wallace posted a video of a test fire last night. could be the test fire we were all waiting for ??


Quote
Well boys and girls, not sure what was just tested at the McGregor Space X facility, but I can tell you it physically shook our entire house and rattled the pictures on the walls. Its loud so watch your volume when playing the video. 11/30/2015 at 10:55PM CST
« Last Edit: 12/01/2015 10:01 am by jacqmans »
Jacques :-)

Offline Hywel1995

  • Member
  • Posts: 44
  • Creator of AllStuffSpace
  • Wales, United Kingdom
  • Liked: 19
  • Likes Given: 169
There is a post here on facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/spacexgroup/

Keith Wallace posted a video of a test fire last night. could be the test fire we were all waiting for ??


Quote
Well boys and girls, not sure what was just tested at the McGregor Space X facility, but I can tell you it physically shook our entire house and rattled the pictures on the walls. Its loud so watch your volume when playing the video. 11/30/2015 at 10:55PM CST

Stage 1 for Orbcomm is already at the Cape. And if I looked correctly this was coming from the New test stand. Not sure though.
« Last Edit: 12/01/2015 10:07 am by Hywel1995 »

Offline Darga

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 170
  • Beyond the wall
  • Liked: 179
  • Likes Given: 881
There is a post here on facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/spacexgroup/

Keith Wallace posted a video of a test fire last night. could be the test fire we were all waiting for ??


Quote
Well boys and girls, not sure what was just tested at the McGregor Space X facility, but I can tell you it physically shook our entire house and rattled the pictures on the walls. Its loud so watch your volume when playing the video. 11/30/2015 at 10:55PM CST

Stage 1 for Orbcomm is already at the Cape. And if I looked correctly this was coming from the New test stand. Not sure though.

The tripod and water tower are visible on the far left so it's not a core test so that only leaves the single engine stand, stage 2 stand or the new one with the smaller trench.

Offline francesco nicoli

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 537
  • Amsterdam
    • About Crises
  • Liked: 290
  • Likes Given: 381
It looks like a Journalist on Twitter has announced Space X likely to attempt a mainland booster landing. Is the guy credible? How the the authorization process is supposed to unfold?

Offline Beittil

James Dean is generally pretty solid with his intel, but keep in mind he states that SpaceX HOPES to land at LC-1... not that they are actually going to or even have permission to.

Online Chris Bergin

It looks like a Journalist on Twitter has announced Space X likely to attempt a mainland booster landing. Is the guy credible? How the the authorization process is supposed to unfold?

Yep, he's credible! :)
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline DatUser14

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 528
  • Liked: 191
  • Likes Given: 651
Excuse me if I misunderstand this, but hasn't some journalist or other said that Spacex hopes the next landing to be on land before a great deal of landing attempts? What makes this different?
Titan IVB was a cool rocket

Offline Bennett

  • Photographer
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 102
  • North Carolina
  • Liked: 330
  • Likes Given: 444
Yes Cariol Scott mention that near the end of the presser
« Last Edit: 12/01/2015 01:56 pm by Bennett »

Offline alexterrell

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1754
  • Germany
  • Liked: 185
  • Likes Given: 108
I'm not sure if this is the right thread, and I have no idea if this is actually relevant to the strut failure, but given the timing and the extensive list of industries Sapa supplies aluminum to, I thought I'd throw it out there as a possibility that might be worth looking into.

NASA has listed major aluminum supplier Sapa as ineligible for federal contracts due to falsification of quality test results.

http://www.kgw.com/story/news/2015/11/05/portland-aluminum-plant-falsified-test-results-letter-customers-says/75259028/
I would hope that SpaceX is free to choose Sapa as a supplier if they want to do so. Sapa wouldn't get a federal contract, they'd get a SpaceX contract.

That's pretty much the whole point of commercial flight. SpaceX chooses the suppliers. Same with foreign components, as long as there aren't national security concerns or safety grounds for objection. (They might object if Russian companies wrote the control software for example - but I'm hope a Falcon has lots of Taiwanese chips based on a British design).

Of course, SpaceX should take into account NASA's view of Sapa, but at the end of the day, they're probably better at procurement than NASA.

Offline sghill

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1685
  • United States
  • Liked: 2095
  • Likes Given: 3214
Chris,  Do we have a launch time on the 15th yet?

If the James Dean tweet pans out, this launch may be worth viewing from Exploration tower.  It's got a terrific view to the LC-1 site from the upper deck.  I may skip work and take the kids to this one!
Bring the thunder!

Offline vulture4

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
  • Liked: 431
  • Likes Given: 92
Excuse me if I misunderstand this, but hasn't some journalist or other said that Spacex hopes the next landing to be on land before a great deal of landing attempts? What makes this different?
SFAIK the constraint preventing landing on land has not been the rocket crashing into the pad and blowing up; that would not damage any government or public property. The reason the offshore landings were required was to demonstrate that the booster could return from the actual launch trajectory to the landing pad accurately, remain under control, and not go off course and damage government or private property or endanger human lives. AIUI the return trajectory used with the barge was the same as the one that will be used for recovery on land, the return burn was just delayed a few seconds to move the landing point offshore.

SpaceX has already demonstrated the capability to land a booster stage intact on the ground quite a few times, although obviously several design problems have been identified during the barge landing attempts and the design has evolved.
« Last Edit: 12/01/2015 03:42 pm by vulture4 »

Offline Eagandale4114

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 302
  • Liked: 564
  • Likes Given: 505
The launch time was noted by orbcomm as being around 2am on December 8 if it was that date, and the time should get approximately 22 minutes earlier each day based on the first OG2 mission.

OK. Midnight-ish then.  Terrible for photos, but it ought to look amazing in person if the weather is clear.

Or a spectacular long exposure.

Offline iamlucky13

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1659
  • Liked: 112
  • Likes Given: 95
SpaceX struts are made of steel.  And aluminum sources are not an issue with RTF anyway.

Ok. Nevermind then. The timing piqued my interest, but clearly I'm on the wrong trail.

I would hope that SpaceX is free to choose Sapa as a supplier if they want to do so. Sapa wouldn't get a federal contract, they'd get a SpaceX contract.

Of course, SpaceX should take into account NASA's view of Sapa, but at the end of the day, they're probably better at procurement than NASA.

The situation I was postulating was not that SpaceX would not be allowed to source from Sapa, but that perhaps the October NASA suspension of Sapa was fallout from SpaceX's June launch failure.

Since several posters have indicated the struts believed to have failed are made from steel, I consider my speculation closed.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1