Quote from: CorvusCorax on 03/02/2019 09:27 pmQuote from: Roy_H on 03/02/2019 08:58 pmThankyou for posting this as I did not stay up to watch it live. However I am generally disappointed on the low quality questions in these briefing. More than 75% are Elon, how do you feel about.... all general emotional questions. I want to see answers to technical questions, the best one was about the grid hydraulic pump failure. If I was able to ask a question I would like to know why SpaceX takes 27 hours to rendezvous with the ISS and the Russians take only 4 hours.To rendezvous with an orbiting spacecraft - such as the station - you need to wait until the earth is turning so your launch-pad is exactly aligned with the orbital plane - while the earth constantly rotates. This means, unless you are capable of doing very expensive high deltaV plane-change manouvers, you end up with an instantaneous launch window.Now the problem is, that you end up in that exact perfect spot only once every 24 hours, as the earth rotates.... Minor correction, this alignment of ISS/target and launch site actually happens twice every 24 hours. On both the ascending and descending tracks. But due to the nature of range/launch safety constraints and the allowable launch azimuths from a given launch site, you may end up being limited to only one of those in practice. For launches from KSC/CCAFS to the ISS, SpaceX and others are limited to only launching into the ascending track (northeast). Launching into the descending track (southeast) would result in overflying landmasses/populations which would violate the allowed safety limits.
Quote from: Roy_H on 03/02/2019 08:58 pmThankyou for posting this as I did not stay up to watch it live. However I am generally disappointed on the low quality questions in these briefing. More than 75% are Elon, how do you feel about.... all general emotional questions. I want to see answers to technical questions, the best one was about the grid hydraulic pump failure. If I was able to ask a question I would like to know why SpaceX takes 27 hours to rendezvous with the ISS and the Russians take only 4 hours.To rendezvous with an orbiting spacecraft - such as the station - you need to wait until the earth is turning so your launch-pad is exactly aligned with the orbital plane - while the earth constantly rotates. This means, unless you are capable of doing very expensive high deltaV plane-change manouvers, you end up with an instantaneous launch window.Now the problem is, that you end up in that exact perfect spot only once every 24 hours, as the earth rotates....
Thankyou for posting this as I did not stay up to watch it live. However I am generally disappointed on the low quality questions in these briefing. More than 75% are Elon, how do you feel about.... all general emotional questions. I want to see answers to technical questions, the best one was about the grid hydraulic pump failure. If I was able to ask a question I would like to know why SpaceX takes 27 hours to rendezvous with the ISS and the Russians take only 4 hours.
https://twitter.com/jaredhead/status/1101766548727844864QuoteAnd SpaceX has said the nose cone on Dragon has opened. Woohoo! Now comes the real test: getting to @Space_Station, especially docking.
And SpaceX has said the nose cone on Dragon has opened. Woohoo! Now comes the real test: getting to @Space_Station, especially docking.
No lighting inside trunk? Pretty sure cargo dragon has lights there so that you can see separation clearly even in the dark.
Interesting headline on Gazeta.RU: Roscosmos didn't congratulate NASA and Musk for today's successful flight:https://m.gazeta.ru/amp/science/2019/03/02_a_12218617.shtml
Anyone know if there is going to be a webcast for docking?
Quote from: groundbound on 03/02/2019 11:16 pmQuote from: M.E.T. on 03/02/2019 11:11 pmQuote from: jak Kennedy on 03/02/2019 11:05 pmSomething strange that Elon said in the post conference, to I believe his second question, while talking about Dragon 2 he said “Hardly a part in common with Dragon 1 which in retrospect will probably change”Not sure what to make of that. Any thoughts or did I just read his reply incorrectly?Since Dragon2 is unlikely to change much given the strict certification process involved I assumed that meant that Dragon1 would be updated to have more commonality with Dragon2.Isn't Dragon 1 in the process of being phased out?Maybe they are going to use some Dragon 2 parts on upcoming Dragon 1 cargo flights.
Quote from: M.E.T. on 03/02/2019 11:11 pmQuote from: jak Kennedy on 03/02/2019 11:05 pmSomething strange that Elon said in the post conference, to I believe his second question, while talking about Dragon 2 he said “Hardly a part in common with Dragon 1 which in retrospect will probably change”Not sure what to make of that. Any thoughts or did I just read his reply incorrectly?Since Dragon2 is unlikely to change much given the strict certification process involved I assumed that meant that Dragon1 would be updated to have more commonality with Dragon2.Isn't Dragon 1 in the process of being phased out?
Quote from: jak Kennedy on 03/02/2019 11:05 pmSomething strange that Elon said in the post conference, to I believe his second question, while talking about Dragon 2 he said “Hardly a part in common with Dragon 1 which in retrospect will probably change”Not sure what to make of that. Any thoughts or did I just read his reply incorrectly?Since Dragon2 is unlikely to change much given the strict certification process involved I assumed that meant that Dragon1 would be updated to have more commonality with Dragon2.
Something strange that Elon said in the post conference, to I believe his second question, while talking about Dragon 2 he said “Hardly a part in common with Dragon 1 which in retrospect will probably change”Not sure what to make of that. Any thoughts or did I just read his reply incorrectly?
Quote from: deruch on 03/02/2019 11:53 pmQuote from: CorvusCorax on 03/02/2019 09:27 pmQuote from: Roy_H on 03/02/2019 08:58 pmThankyou for posting this as I did not stay up to watch it live. However I am generally disappointed on the low quality questions in these briefing. More than 75% are Elon, how do you feel about.... all general emotional questions. I want to see answers to technical questions, the best one was about the grid hydraulic pump failure. If I was able to ask a question I would like to know why SpaceX takes 27 hours to rendezvous with the ISS and the Russians take only 4 hours.To rendezvous with an orbiting spacecraft - such as the station - you need to wait until the earth is turning so your launch-pad is exactly aligned with the orbital plane - while the earth constantly rotates. This means, unless you are capable of doing very expensive high deltaV plane-change manouvers, you end up with an instantaneous launch window.Now the problem is, that you end up in that exact perfect spot only once every 24 hours, as the earth rotates.... Minor correction, this alignment of ISS/target and launch site actually happens twice every 24 hours. On both the ascending and descending tracks. But due to the nature of range/launch safety constraints and the allowable launch azimuths from a given launch site, you may end up being limited to only one of those in practice. For launches from KSC/CCAFS to the ISS, SpaceX and others are limited to only launching into the ascending track (northeast). Launching into the descending track (southeast) would result in overflying landmasses/populations which would violate the allowed safety limits. Really, really minor correction...Once or twice every 23 hours 56 minutes.
I've been wondering - will astronauts be allowed to enter Crew Dragon (possibly yes), for how long and will it be shown on NASA TV?
The Shelton family of Dallas was known for the tradition of sending flowers to @NASA_Johnson for Shuttle missions. We haven't had a delivery since 2011 - until I got a call on console today. A reminder of what @Commercial_Crew means for this nation and the world. Go @spacex!
As the tradition goes, one white rose to signifies the sacrifices of Columbia, Challenger, and Apollo 1. The other roses are for the current @Space_Station crew of 3. And then there's an extra rose - why? It's for #ripley, the @SpaceX dummy. And it's the only fake rose.
Looks like the seats have the ability to slide back under the seat back, when not used to (see picture attached)??
why isn't the keep out sphere mentioned during Soyuz and Progress approaches?
Dragon 2 HUD view - first time we've seen this. Heading to the KOS (Keep Out Sphere), but that screen. This is what the astros will use. Very nice layout.