Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 / Dragon 2 : SpX-DM1 : March 2, 2019 : DISCUSSION  (Read 601784 times)

Offline mikegi

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 501
  • Liked: 37
  • Likes Given: 39
Did one chute end up covering the Dragon?

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13469
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11869
  • Likes Given: 11115
<two splashdown pics, second one collapsed mains>
Do the mains collapse like that on their own or because of the reefcutter, or both?
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1594
  • Somewhere on the boat
  • Liked: 1869
  • Likes Given: 1262
Was just about to post that. Looks like one  was upwind of the dragon and blew onto it when it hit the water.

Did one chute end up covering the Dragon?

Offline Lampyridae

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2664
  • South Africa
  • Liked: 960
  • Likes Given: 2122
Did one chute end up covering the Dragon?

Looks that way, but just partially.

Offline CorvusCorax

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1921
  • Germany
  • Liked: 4148
  • Likes Given: 2825
That kinda defies the use of a reef cutter. You don't want the wind blowing into the parachute and dragging on the capsule.
Of course if the parachute covers the capsule and the capsule then sets sail, the chase ships find themselves in a sail regatta against the SS Dragon2 ;)

Edit: the pro side is, it really helps with parachute recovery, no risk of them sinking ;)
« Last Edit: 03/08/2019 12:57 pm by CorvusCorax »

Offline Joffan

Looks like one parachute is draped around the back side of Dragon
Yeah, I think the fast boat went up, had a look and a chat with the main boat and my guess is they're going in to check on everything carefully. Learning opportunity.

 (and unveiled as I type :) )
« Last Edit: 03/08/2019 01:02 pm by Joffan »
Getting through max-Q for humanity becoming fully spacefaring

Offline clongton

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12102
  • Connecticut
    • Direct Launcher
  • Liked: 7500
  • Likes Given: 3809
Not good that 1 chute covered Dragon. Potential to catch a wind and drag the spacecraft.
Chuck - DIRECT co-founder
I started my career on the Saturn-V F-1A engine

Offline sfxtd

  • Slow, but Sure User
  • Member
  • Posts: 96
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 70
That ride under parachute looked rather nauseating. There was a pronounced pitch oscillation under the drogues and substantial "random" movement under the mains. It looks like a recipe to soil ones helmet.

I wonder if there is a reasonable modification to the rigging or aerodynamics that might mitigate that motion.

Offline kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1594
  • Somewhere on the boat
  • Liked: 1869
  • Likes Given: 1262
One of the side effects of going for a 4 chute system - Bigger chance of one of them catching the capsule. Nothing you can do to prevent it unless you have a good breeze to ensure they are carried away. Looked very benign out there today and little wind.

Not good that 1 chute covered Dragon. Potential to catch a wind and drag the spacecraft.

Offline kessdawg

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Liked: 328
  • Likes Given: 1567
There was worry about the asymmetric backshell causing a spin during re-entry.  Do we know if that was avoided?

Offline JBF

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1459
  • Liked: 472
  • Likes Given: 914
Not good that 1 chute covered Dragon. Potential to catch a wind and drag the spacecraft.
That depends on if it's actually tangled under the capsule. Remember the mains are cut; so there is a good chance it would just blow off.
"In principle, rocket engines are simple, but that’s the last place rocket engines are ever simple." Jeff Bezos

Offline Joffan

There was worry about the asymmetric backshell causing a spin during re-entry.  Do we know if that was avoided?
I didn't see any spin at the time of drogue chute deploy.
Getting through max-Q for humanity becoming fully spacefaring

Offline hektor

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Liked: 1234
  • Likes Given: 55
Also the crew inside cannot see outside with the chute over the windows. So it deprives the crew from information.

Offline yokem55

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 653
  • Oregon (Ore-uh-gun dammit)
  • Liked: 468
  • Likes Given: 13
That ride under parachute looked rather nauseating. There was a pronounced pitch oscillation under the drogues and substantial "random" movement under the mains. It looks like a recipe to soil ones helmet.

I wonder if there is a reasonable modification to the rigging or aerodynamics that might mitigate that motion.
Yeah, I can understand the hand wringing about the chutes now. It's the piece that has to work, but obviously has a lot of difficult to model behaviors and interactions. I was worried all the chutes were going to tangle and foul themselves. Then, I'm not sure how you prevent one of the chutes from coming down on top of Dragon after spash down like we saw.

Almost makes powered landing seem easier.
« Last Edit: 03/08/2019 01:15 pm by yokem55 »

Offline webdan

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 235
  • Clearwater, FL
  • Liked: 252
  • Likes Given: 272
I got a bit of a chuckle when Benji Reed said "Bob and Doug", referring to DM-2...

Offline punder

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Liked: 1858
  • Likes Given: 1472
Having one of the chutes land on the capsule has to be a fair-probability event. They have prepared for it I imagine.

Offline A12

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • ROME, ITALY
  • Liked: 69
  • Likes Given: 487
Mr.  Bridenstine giving a short speech now on the splashdown stream, putting a strong emphasis on reuse.

Offline CorvusCorax

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1921
  • Germany
  • Liked: 4148
  • Likes Given: 2825
Also the crew inside cannot see outside with the chute over the windows. So it deprives the crew from information.

Yeah, its definitely an anomaly, but not a very critical one. And I think its not something that can be avoided with any multi-parachute system. The chance of it is basically down to the wind and the number of parachute. You can't do more than cut them, which apparently happened correctly.

Also they managed to "fix" it very very quickly, so as far as procedures is concerned it looks all great to me.

It could be dangerous if it happens in bad sea state, the capsule is leaking and running full of water, the crew needs to leave in a hurry, and then they get caught in an entangled parachute and lines and pulled under.
That's kinda the worst case scenario, but I don't think this is likely to happen in stronger winds as the chute would just be blown off.



Offline punder

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Liked: 1858
  • Likes Given: 1472
Couple of bits that flew off during reentry... Probably just little particles of TPS or paint, but for obvious reasons I had a bit of a jolt. Things that cannot be unseen...

Or maybe things that were supposed to come off. Covers or hatches.

Ninja'd by DecoLV during edit!
« Last Edit: 03/08/2019 01:27 pm by punder »

Offline DecoLV

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 234
  • Boston, MA, USA
  • Liked: 205
  • Likes Given: 72
Couple of bits that flew off during reentry... Probably just little particles of TPS or paint, but for obvious reasons I had a bit of a jolt. Things that cannot be unseen...

Drogue doors coming off, mostly likely.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1