It looks like the mouth of the interstage is completely out of the water or very close to it.
Quote from: The_Ronin on 01/31/2018 08:48 pmGoing by the cadence of the callouts from burn to legs to splashdown, I'm going with the 3 engine suicide burn. Have they ever landed one of those, yet? I remember SES-9 punching a nice hole in OCISLY when they tried it then.AFAIK, they never performed a complete landing using a 3 engine burn, it was at most 3 engines for a portion of the landing burn and then a switch to the "normal", single-engine landing.
Going by the cadence of the callouts from burn to legs to splashdown, I'm going with the 3 engine suicide burn. Have they ever landed one of those, yet? I remember SES-9 punching a nice hole in OCISLY when they tried it then.
Quote from: StuffOfInterest on 02/02/2018 10:33 amIt looks like the mouth of the interstage is completely out of the water or very close to it. Actually everything from halfway on the oxygen tank is out of the water.That there ship is VERY stern-heavy
Here's a cropped, enlarged and enhanced image of the first stage in the ocean.
All actual explosives are installed at the launch site, including the det cord, shape charges and initiators.
Quote from: Lar on 02/01/2018 08:22 pmQuote from: gongora on 02/01/2018 08:06 pmQuote from: lrk on 02/01/2018 08:04 pmThey routinely haul boosters across the country somewhat pressurized, although I'm not sure to what level. So a pressurized booster can't be that dangerous. This booster has a lot of liquids and gases (and explosives) that wouldn't be in the boosters getting trucked around the country.That's interesting. The transport trailers have devices that I beleive keep the stage tanks partially pressurised with inert gas (nitrogen or atmosphere?) so no liquids or gases but I always assumed that the plastic explosive zipcord was put on in Hatwthorne[1], not at the launch pad... so it WOULD have explosives on it during transport. Wrong?1 - and stayed on forever, across reuses, even?All actual explosives are installed at the launch site, including the det cord, shape charges and initiators.
Quote from: gongora on 02/01/2018 08:06 pmQuote from: lrk on 02/01/2018 08:04 pmThey routinely haul boosters across the country somewhat pressurized, although I'm not sure to what level. So a pressurized booster can't be that dangerous. This booster has a lot of liquids and gases (and explosives) that wouldn't be in the boosters getting trucked around the country.That's interesting. The transport trailers have devices that I beleive keep the stage tanks partially pressurised with inert gas (nitrogen or atmosphere?) so no liquids or gases but I always assumed that the plastic explosive zipcord was put on in Hatwthorne[1], not at the launch pad... so it WOULD have explosives on it during transport. Wrong?1 - and stayed on forever, across reuses, even?
Quote from: lrk on 02/01/2018 08:04 pmThey routinely haul boosters across the country somewhat pressurized, although I'm not sure to what level. So a pressurized booster can't be that dangerous. This booster has a lot of liquids and gases (and explosives) that wouldn't be in the boosters getting trucked around the country.
They routinely haul boosters across the country somewhat pressurized, although I'm not sure to what level. So a pressurized booster can't be that dangerous.
Does the F9 still use detonators? Once AFTS was installed, I thought core 'dispersed' fuel/oxidizer by depressurizing one of the tanks and failing the common bulkhead (like done a McGregor for Dev vehicle).
There is a great story posted on the 45th's website about the GovSat-1 launch and the 60th anniversary of launching Explorer I. It's based on Dr. John Meisenheimer who was the Launch Weather Officer 60 years ago and one more time 60 years later. http://www.patrick.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1430590/launching-with-a-legacy-weather-pioneer-returns-60-years-after-historic-mission/
Any eyes on ship locations? I'm very interested in traveling to Jetty Pier to document this regardless of arrival time.
Only boat not accounted for at this time is GO Searcher... Anyone with a Marine Traffic satellite account care to comment on it's location, course, and speed?Thanks...
[–]robbak 3 points 2 hours ago* Go Searcher is still hanging around the area where B0132.2 splashed down, not making any moves toward shore as of the last update. Go Quest is approaching port - just now identified by shore-based AIS - but at far too high a speed for one towing anything.
I wonder what sort of plan SpaceX is hatching to recover the stage?...
Quote from: John Alan on 02/03/2018 08:44 amI wonder what sort of plan SpaceX is hatching to recover the stage?... 'We'll think about it once FH recovery is done' ?