Quote from: Marsin2010 on 04/18/2018 11:29 pmMy Launch Central video feed was very fuzzy. The countdown timer and the progress bar text were quite illegible. I reset the feed several times. It would briefly clear up and then go fuzzy again. Whereas my simultaneous NASA TV feed was extremely crisp. I have watched well over 40 Falcon 9 launches and have never had this happen before. Anyone else?I had the same experience as you including the fact that the countdown timer would clear up briefly each time I reloaded the site and then get fuzzy again. I have not seen this before.
My Launch Central video feed was very fuzzy. The countdown timer and the progress bar text were quite illegible. I reset the feed several times. It would briefly clear up and then go fuzzy again. Whereas my simultaneous NASA TV feed was extremely crisp. I have watched well over 40 Falcon 9 launches and have never had this happen before. Anyone else?
Quote from: marsbase on 04/18/2018 11:54 pmQuote from: Marsin2010 on 04/18/2018 11:29 pmMy Launch Central video feed was very fuzzy. The countdown timer and the progress bar text were quite illegible. I reset the feed several times. It would briefly clear up and then go fuzzy again. Whereas my simultaneous NASA TV feed was extremely crisp. I have watched well over 40 Falcon 9 launches and have never had this happen before. Anyone else?I had the same experience as you including the fact that the countdown timer would clear up briefly each time I reloaded the site and then get fuzzy again. I have not seen this before.On YouTube it defaults to Auto for quality and for the first time today it was giving me low quality, I switched from Auto to HD and that fixed it for me.
It was fun to see applause from the TESS control room when the first stage landed on OCISLY...
Quote from: the_other_Doug on 04/18/2018 10:25 pmI would really like to know how the YouTube app on most devices manages its search results.On a quite standard YouTube app, I just entered the search phrase SpaceX TESS launch. It showed something like 30 search results -- everything from rebroadcasts of SpaceX's current feed by other websites, to recordings of the 16th's scrub, to Falcon Heavy and BFR simulations -- before it listed SpaceX's own streaming channel for today's launch.Which was listed as "SpaceX TESS launch". The *exact* text of my search phrase.You would think high-profile online content management systems like YouTube would understand that we are smart enough to realize that they're giving results that badly fit the search criteria precedence over results which fit them well. That can only mean that, 1) their search function sucks rocks, or 2) they are giving some types of providers precedence, even when their result doesn't really fit. For monetary or other considerations.You'd be surprised how many people believe it's option number 1... sigh...Do you think Google are just there to give away content for free. It’s a trade as with so many of these free online services more often you’re trading your data in exchange for the service. I for one don’t begrudge them doing this as they have a business to run, nor the people on there who have to monetise their content as that’s their career. This shouldn’t be an issue provided both parties are aware of this.Anyway the easy answer is just subscribe to the right channels and they will always jump up your home feed when needed.
I would really like to know how the YouTube app on most devices manages its search results.On a quite standard YouTube app, I just entered the search phrase SpaceX TESS launch. It showed something like 30 search results -- everything from rebroadcasts of SpaceX's current feed by other websites, to recordings of the 16th's scrub, to Falcon Heavy and BFR simulations -- before it listed SpaceX's own streaming channel for today's launch.Which was listed as "SpaceX TESS launch". The *exact* text of my search phrase.You would think high-profile online content management systems like YouTube would understand that we are smart enough to realize that they're giving results that badly fit the search criteria precedence over results which fit them well. That can only mean that, 1) their search function sucks rocks, or 2) they are giving some types of providers precedence, even when their result doesn't really fit. For monetary or other considerations.You'd be surprised how many people believe it's option number 1... sigh...
Is there a published timeline of the burns planned for TESS as it moves toward its final orbit? What’s the best forum here at NSF to follow TESS’ progress as it is now more of a NASA mission than a SpaceX mission.
Yay!I just realized that if launches continue at this pace, we are less than a year away from when Falcon 9 has more launches than Atlas 5.
Quote from: groundbound on 04/19/2018 01:31 amYay!I just realized that if launches continue at this pace, we are less than a year away from when Falcon 9 has more launches than Atlas 5.Maybe just under a year from when Falcon 9 has more launches than Atlas V has today.
This may be Day One of a mission that will give us a first look at an exoplanet that harbours life.
Yay!I just realized that if launches continue at this pace, we are less than a year away from when Falcon 9 has more launches than Atlas 5.And please do not take this as a knock on A5. It is a fantastic rocket that has been our national workhorse for the better part of 2 decades, which is why I made the comparison.