Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - Dragon - CRS-5/SpX-5 -Jan. 10, 2015 - DISCUSSION  (Read 618061 times)

Offline llanitedave

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2284
  • Nevada Desert
  • Liked: 1542
  • Likes Given: 2060
It does look like a good deal.  It's got an old abandoned airstrip right in the middle that might be restored enough for a landing pad.  The roads down to the dock look pretty twisty, though.
"I've just abducted an alien -- now what?"

Offline Burninate

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1145
  • Liked: 360
  • Likes Given: 74
Seems strange to me that they're first using these grid fins on the same launch where they've got everyone watching to see if they can accurately target a landing barge.   

The only flight data they have on the performance of those fins are from low altitude and low velocity manoeuvring on the F9R-Dev.  They have very little data on how they will perform during a high velocity re-entry. 


Just playing devil's advocate here, but what makes you think they'll be used at all during re-entry? I suspect they'll stay safely stowed flat until terminal velocity, or at most used with very, very, small deflections until very late in the landing sequence.

What makes me think that is that they're grid fins.  IANAAE, but grid fins seem to be a special-use device for steady supersonic and high subsonic control in a compact fold-out profile.  If they were targetting the low subsonic, I would expect them to use planar fins.

Can we get an aerospace engineer to chime in?

Offline NaN

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 248
  • Liked: 248
  • Likes Given: 232

Just playing devil's advocate here, but what makes you think they'll be used at all during re-entry? I suspect they'll stay safely stowed flat until terminal velocity, or at most used with very, very, small deflections until very late in the landing sequence.

What makes me think that is that they're grid fins.  IANAAE, but grid fins seem to be a special-use device for steady supersonic and high subsonic control in a compact fold-out profile.  If they were targetting the low subsonic, I would expect them to use planar fins.

IANAAE either, but SpaceX has already demonstrated stage reentry multiple times with no evident problems, so adding grid fins for that flight regime wouldn't be useful. Also:

Quote from: Wikipedia
Grid fins perform very well at subsonic and supersonic speeds, but poorly at transonic speeds

to me the biggest win would seem to be the ability to steer the stage somewhat, after the reentry burn. It gains some ability to steer aerodynamically to give a small cross-range ability and better accuracy, useful since they can't translate propulsively at the end. So I would expect them to pop out subsonic.

All this speculation is fun, but I am really looking forward to seeing it for real

Offline Semmel

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2178
  • Germany
  • Liked: 2433
  • Likes Given: 11922
Ok, speculation ahead: Is it possible that the first stage needs the fins to compensate for the wind? The wind changes its speed and direction with altitude. The first stage will plow through the atmosphere quite quickly, but even an error of the wind-model of just one meter per second is strong enough to push the stage off target. Maybe the grid fins are necessary to compensate for that.

Offline Jcc

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Liked: 404
  • Likes Given: 203
The stage can be steered somewhat with RCS by adjusting attitude, lift and drag, but that uses RCS propellent, and is most effective at high speed. Grid fins will save on RCS propellent, and provide better control at lower speed before powered landing.

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
Let's also remember that the steering fins also represent an abort capability. In the event of a centreline engine ignition failure, the fins can be used to steer the vehicle away from a potentially-expensive high-speed collision with the barge.
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline Mike_1179

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 670
  • New Jersey
  • Liked: 383
  • Likes Given: 87
Grid fins will save on RCS propellent, and provide better control at lower speed before powered landing.

The first "water landing" failed because the RCS didn't have enough control authority (or ran out of prop) so the stage spun up and moved fuel away from the sump. Grid fins provide some of the control to save prop for things like a terminal move toward the barge (target away from the barge in case the engine doesn't relight).

Offline ChefPat

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1055
  • Earth, for now
  • Liked: 125
  • Likes Given: 1022
Seems strange to me that they're first using these grid fins on the same launch where they've got everyone watching to see if they can accurately target a landing barge.   

The only flight data they have on the performance of those fins are from low altitude and low velocity manoeuvring on the F9R-Dev.  They have very little data on how they will perform during a high velocity re-entry. 

I would have expected them to first try them out and collect characterization data during a high altitude/velocity test of the F9R-Dev, or perhaps on one of their earlier hail-Mary soft splashdowns in the big wide ocean.  They could have performed a series of manoeuvres on the fins during various phases of the descent without caring if it sent the trajectory just a little bit off course, and used the collected data to refine the control system.

I suppose they're just really confident in their computer modelling.
What makes you think they haven't done wind tunnel testing?
Playing Politics with Commercial Crew is Un-American!!!

Offline Aerospace Dilettante

  • Member
  • Posts: 57
  • Liked: 20
  • Likes Given: 31
"You can just do an easy calculation of what's the terminal velocity and then how long you have to fire the engine, at what g-level, to get to zero velocity. If you then do some interesting things, like look at our landing gear, they're essentially like giant body flaps, so the drag - when we deploy the landing gear, the drag massively increases, so we have dual use of the landing gear as giant body flaps and as landing gear. That actually cuts the terminal velocity in half and therefore the fuel - the propellant we need to stop the vehicle in half, and actually it's quite an efficient method of landing precisely."  - Elon at the MIT Aero/Astro Con 2014 via Sh!tElonSays


Maybe with the grid fins they'll be able to pop out the landing gear much earlier, not just before touch down like they've done with the previous water landings.

Offline macpacheco

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 892
  • Vitoria-ES-Brazil
  • Liked: 368
  • Likes Given: 3041
"You can just do an easy calculation of what's the terminal velocity and then how long you have to fire the engine, at what g-level, to get to zero velocity. If you then do some interesting things, like look at our landing gear, they're essentially like giant body flaps, so the drag - when we deploy the landing gear, the drag massively increases, so we have dual use of the landing gear as giant body flaps and as landing gear. That actually cuts the terminal velocity in half and therefore the fuel - the propellant we need to stop the vehicle in half, and actually it's quite an efficient method of landing precisely."  - Elon at the MIT Aero/Astro Con 2014 via Sh!tElonSays


Maybe with the grid fins they'll be able to pop out the landing gear much earlier, not just before touch down like they've done with the previous water landings.
Actually cutting velocity in half reduces kinectic energy by 75%. So it might cut fuel for the last burn by around 75% too.
Looking for companies doing great things for much more than money

Offline AdrianW

  • Member
  • Posts: 82
  • Liked: 80
  • Likes Given: 262
"You can just do an easy calculation of what's the terminal velocity and then how long you have to fire the engine, at what g-level, to get to zero velocity. If you then do some interesting things, like look at our landing gear, they're essentially like giant body flaps, so the drag - when we deploy the landing gear, the drag massively increases, so we have dual use of the landing gear as giant body flaps and as landing gear. That actually cuts the terminal velocity in half and therefore the fuel - the propellant we need to stop the vehicle in half, and actually it's quite an efficient method of landing precisely."  - Elon at the MIT Aero/Astro Con 2014 via Sh!tElonSays


Maybe with the grid fins they'll be able to pop out the landing gear much earlier, not just before touch down like they've done with the previous water landings.
Actually cutting velocity in half reduces kinectic energy by 75%. So it might cut fuel for the last burn by around 75% too.
It doesn't work that way. For the sake of simplicity, let's assume constant thrust and constant acceleration. To zero out half the terminal velocity, you need to burn half as long (because v=a*s), using up half as much fuel. If you start burning at full terminal velocity, the first half of the burn (from full terminal velocity to half the terminal velocity) will be at a higher speed, so the same acceleration will be done over a longer distance compared to the second half of the burn. Since W=F*s, the same amount of fuel will perform more work (75% of total work).
But here we don't care about energy, only about velocity. The change in velocity is proportional to the length of the burn, which is proportional to the amount of fuel used.

Offline aero

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • 92129
  • Liked: 1146
  • Likes Given: 360
Don't forget that while you're burning that fuel, you are also slowed by the massive increase in drag, at least for the first seconds of burn. Of course at zero velocity there is no drag and drag does go down quickly as the vehicle slows. Drag is proportional to V2 in case you are wondering.
Retired, working interesting problems

Offline Mark McCombs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 346
  • SW Washington
  • Liked: 210
  • Likes Given: 2276
Speculation: Could the grid fins be deployed twice during the descent?  Deployed at some point while supersonic then stowed for transonic and then redeployed for the remainder of the descent.
"Are you sure you want to go to Red Alert, Sir? It does mean changing the bulb." - Kryten
"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory". LLAP - Leonard Nimoy

Offline Roy_H

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1209
    • Political Solutions
  • Liked: 450
  • Likes Given: 3163
I would be concerned about the deployment of grid fins happening at high speed in lower atmosphere, as the aerodynamic  forces would tend to make them snap open violently and possibly break off. This leaves the opening either after slowed to terminal velocity or very high up where the air is very thin. I think they will choose to open very high up, about the time of the initial braking burn. This way they will have the added drag to aid slowing down as well as control during the entire decent.
"If we don't achieve re-usability, I will consider SpaceX to be a failure." - Elon Musk
Spacestation proposal: https://politicalsolutions.ca/forum/index.php?topic=3.0

Offline Herb Schaltegger

Seems strange to me that they're first using these grid fins on the same launch where they've got everyone watching to see if they can accurately target a landing barge.   

The only flight data they have on the performance of those fins are from low altitude and low velocity manoeuvring on the F9R-Dev.  They have very little data on how they will perform during a high velocity re-entry. 


Just playing devil's advocate here, but what makes you think they'll be used at all during re-entry? I suspect they'll stay safely stowed flat until terminal velocity, or at most used with very, very, small deflections until very late in the landing sequence.

What makes me think that is that they're grid fins.  IANAAE, but grid fins seem to be a special-use device for steady supersonic and high subsonic control in a compact fold-out profile.  If they were targetting the low subsonic, I would expect them to use planar fins.

Can we get an aerospace engineer to chime in?

Um, I'M an aerospace engineer ... used to be, anyway. ;)  That said, read the post I responded to very, very carefully, then re-read my very specific answer.
Ad astra per aspirin ...

Offline MP99

I would be concerned about the deployment of grid fins happening at high speed in lower atmosphere, as the aerodynamic  forces would tend to make them snap open violently and possibly break off. This leaves the opening either after slowed to terminal velocity or very high up where the air is very thin. I think they will choose to open very high up, about the time of the initial braking burn. This way they will have the added drag to aid slowing down as well as control during the entire decent.
ISTM they could launch pointing downwards (so that airflow pins them to the body), then transition to pointing upwards around apogee (in vacuum), so that when they hit atmosphere any "snapping" would be to snap shut rather than open.

In fact, this would seem to be a sensible way to operate, unless they explicitly want to have them open via air pressure around max-Q on the way down (which I find a bit unlikely).

Cheers, Martin

Offline The Roadie

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
  • Portland, Oregon
  • Liked: 2327
  • Likes Given: 98
Photo just tweeted ten minutes ago:
"A human being should be able to...plan an invasion..conn a ship..solve equations, analyze a new problem..program a computer, cook a tasty meal.."-RAH

Offline MTom

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 573
  • EU / Hungary
  • Liked: 340
  • Likes Given: 993
Photo just tweeted ten minutes ago:

And the tweet is:

Testing operation of hypersonic grid fins (x-wing config) going on next flight pic.twitter.com/O1tMSIXxsT
« Last Edit: 11/22/2014 08:45 pm by MTom »

Offline MTom

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 573
  • EU / Hungary
  • Liked: 340
  • Likes Given: 993
@elonmusk

Grid fins are stowed on ascent and then deploy on reentry for "x-wing" style control. Each fin moves independently for pitch/yaw/roll.
« Last Edit: 11/22/2014 08:43 pm by MTom »

Offline mr. mark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
  • Liked: 172
  • Likes Given: 0
SpaceX Landing barge.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1