Must be news since I never knew that there are farming activities in KSC and VAFB.....how are the arrangements done? (especially with VAFB since it is an air force base after all....)
Quote from: R7 on 10/11/2014 02:52 pmAny idea why they want to hire a farmer instead of renting the land to a local farmer?Potential legal issues if an accident damaged the crops. If they leased the land, the crops belongs to the farmer. If they hire a farmer to tend crops owned by SpaceX, then there's no problem.
Any idea why they want to hire a farmer instead of renting the land to a local farmer?
Quote from: Aerospace Dilettante on 10/11/2014 06:16 amBy vigorously farming (with boo coo plowing and chemicals) the land around their future launch site, the chances that an Endangered Species Act critter will take up residence will be greatly reduced.Surely a "Dilettante" should know that it's spelled beaucoup.
By vigorously farming (with boo coo plowing and chemicals) the land around their future launch site, the chances that an Endangered Species Act critter will take up residence will be greatly reduced.
Please put your coffee mugs down ...With the readily adaptive and innovative culture of SpaceX, I offer this insight. Note in the job posting:"Valid Driver’s License, and a clean driving recordMust be able to climb ladders and work in tight spaces. ... Must be able to work an extremely flexible schedule with extra hours as needed ..."It appears to me SpaceX is recruiting for Dragon 2 flight crew.
Why would SpaceX hire a farmer instead of leasing the land to one?
Why would SpaceX hire a farmer instead of leasing the land to one?Seems like they specifically want the land to be farmed/cultivated, rather than just leased or rented to someone for their own use.
... if they're farming "inside the gate" then it may be they want to avoid corporate espionage or ITAR issues by having a leaser farm instead.
Quote from: sanman on 10/12/2014 03:53 amWhy would SpaceX hire a farmer instead of leasing the land to one?If the owner of the land farms that land, it may be taxed at a much lower rate than if the land were leased.
Quote from: Dave G on 10/12/2014 12:13 pmQuote from: sanman on 10/12/2014 03:53 amWhy would SpaceX hire a farmer instead of leasing the land to one?If the owner of the land farms that land, it may be taxed at a much lower rate than if the land were leased.No, you would get the same property tax discount even if it were leased, as long as the land is in agricultural (or timber) production. I am a Texas landowner who benefits from exactly the same tax break by leasing my property for agricultural use.The best guess so far is that the reason to hire rather than lease has to do with ITAR. No way does this have anything to do with agriculture in space or on Mars. The job description is too specific.
Must be able to climb ladders and work in tight spaces. Required to exert physical effort in handling objects up to 50 pounds Required to be exposed to physical environment which involves dirt, odors, noise, weather extremes or similar elements most of the work day Must be able to work an extremely flexible schedule with extra hours as needed by business demands; typically, SpaceX employees work a minimum 50 hour week. This position will be required to work around test schedules as necessary to ensure the successful crop production does not interfere with testing progress.
I'm guessing that they may lose a tractor or two from debris from F9R.
Quote from: mlindner on 10/11/2014 06:28 pmUh I don't think this has anything to do with SpaceX. If Boeing did the same or NASA did the same I think a post would also appear for those. I had not heard that KSC had orchards. Get real, it has everything to do with Spacex. Nobody would have posted it if it was done by other organizations. Also, VAFB has cultivated fields on it.
Uh I don't think this has anything to do with SpaceX. If Boeing did the same or NASA did the same I think a post would also appear for those. I had not heard that KSC had orchards.