Author Topic: Falcon 9 target orbit accuracy  (Read 6568 times)

Offline kirghizstan

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
  • Liked: 179
  • Likes Given: 86
Falcon 9 target orbit accuracy
« on: 09/22/2014 03:49 pm »
Has anyone looked at how accurate has F9 been with regards to target orbits relative to other current vehicles?
« Last Edit: 10/06/2014 05:34 pm by Carl G »

Online Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4624
  • Likes Given: 5359
Re: Rocket Accuracy
« Reply #1 on: 10/03/2014 04:46 am »
Has anyone looked at how accurate has F9 been with regards to target orbits relative to other current vehicles?
You can probably research this yourself on Jonathan's Space Page.
Dr. McDowell (our jcm!) may have this in a table somewhere but undoubtedly has the data.
It is probably in his Master Launch Log.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline EchoLogic

Re: Rocket Accuracy
« Reply #2 on: 10/03/2014 02:26 pm »
I've done a few comparisons of the commercial sat launches for SpaceX, and they are noticeably getting more accurate. IIRC AsiaSat 6 was the most accurate so far. Orbcomm CEO was also impressed by the accuracy after the launch of OG2. The numbers are buried in a Reddit comment I made somewhere.

Offline metaphor

  • Member
  • Posts: 56
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Rocket Accuracy
« Reply #3 on: 10/06/2014 05:24 pm »
The relative accuracy is not quite that clear from those numbers.  Achieving the same error at a higher apogee is much harder, assuming error is proportional to delta-v accuracy.  And the error scales higher than a linear function (for example, a 90 km margin at 90,000 km is harder to achieve than a 30 km margin at 30,000 km). 

Also, in the case of super-synchronous orbits, the Falcon 9 upper stage is lighter at burnout (since it has to go through more delta-v), and therefore it has higher thrust.  If the accuracy depends on the exact time the engine cuts off, this means that the same delta-t error will result in a higher delta-v error in those cases.

A third point is that the 80,000 km and 90,000 km apogees are suspiciously round numbers, from which I would think that the customer doesn't require very high accuracy.  The only thing an error in apogee would do for a super-synchronous orbit launch would be to slightly change the delta-v of the following perigee-raising burn.  In the case of a stationary transfer orbit, the apogee does have to be very close to 35,786 km, otherwise the satellite has to do an entirely new burn at a different place in its orbit to fix the apogee.

So I don't really see SpaceX getting more accurate in their launches as much as I see a geostationary transfer launch being both easier and more important to get accurate than a super-synchronous transfer launch.
« Last Edit: 10/06/2014 05:34 pm by Carl G »

Offline Carl G

  • Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1140
  • Liked: 260
  • Likes Given: 140
Re: Falcon 9 target orbit accuracy
« Reply #4 on: 10/06/2014 05:35 pm »
Thread title made descriptive. Only accurate references are welcome here, so don't link random social media, use accurate sites, like Jonathans.

Offline sheltonjr

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 148
  • Liked: 63
  • Likes Given: 37
Re: Falcon 9 target orbit accuracy
« Reply #5 on: 10/07/2014 04:22 pm »
 I learned a lot reading the article on what the Soyuz rocket went through to be able to do the quick 6 hour transit to the station. It was mostly about accurate orbital insertion.

Will the current F9 with Dragon V2 orbital insertion accuracy good enough for Dragon to also do a quick transit to the ISS?

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13469
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11869
  • Likes Given: 11116
Re: Falcon 9 target orbit accuracy
« Reply #6 on: 10/07/2014 04:47 pm »
Thread title made descriptive. Only accurate references are welcome here, so don't link random social media, use accurate sites, like Jonathans.

As a note, without the release of official data by SpaceX themselves or their customer on exactly what they were trying for, there is a limit to how accurate an analysis can be. That said, I'm with Carl, let's use official data whereever possible. Orbital element sets, press releases from customers, and so forth, and failing that, let's go with the best of the rest, such as Jonathan's site...
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline pericynthion

  • GNC / Comms Engineer
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
  • Liked: 426
  • Likes Given: 167
Re: Falcon 9 target orbit accuracy
« Reply #7 on: 10/07/2014 07:12 pm »
Will the current F9 with Dragon V2 orbital insertion accuracy good enough for Dragon to also do a quick transit to the ISS?

I believe SpaceX have said that they intend to perform first-day rendezvous with crewed Dragon flights, so presumably yes.
« Last Edit: 10/07/2014 07:12 pm by pericynthion »

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
Re: Falcon 9 target orbit accuracy
« Reply #8 on: 10/08/2014 03:14 pm »
Are there any operational constrains that would prevent a first-day berthing for a CRS flight? IIRC the "climbing the ladder" procedure takes a lot longer than a crewed docking (judging by the speed of Soyuz approaches).

Offline Scylla

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 715
  • Clinton NC, USA
  • Liked: 1130
  • Likes Given: 150
Re: Falcon 9 target orbit accuracy
« Reply #9 on: 10/08/2014 03:23 pm »
Are there any operational constrains that would prevent a first-day berthing for a CRS flight? IIRC the "climbing the ladder" procedure takes a lot longer than a crewed docking (judging by the speed of Soyuz approaches).

Unless my memory is faulty, I believe this question has been covered elsewhere in these forums. The conclusion being that someone from SpaceX stated there were no operational constraints. The only limiting factor was ISS had to be in the right spot to make it possible, the same for Soyuz, and that some time in the future they would start doing same-day berthing.
I reject your reality and substitute my own--Doctor Who

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1