Up until now Spaceflight has been primarily the purview of Governments. Recently commercial entities have been making inroads into spaceflight but to my knowledge they have not done anything that has not been done previously by governments. What do members see as the initial firsts, to be done by commercial entities?Who will do it?When will they do it?
My guess would be reuse of a liquid fueled first stage with only checkout and replacing consumables, no refurbishment, will be the first first. I think it will be by YE 2016.
My guesses would be: 1. Commercial satellite refueling. 2. Commercial space junk safing or de-orbiting.These offer the potential, in theory at least, of profit. - Ed Kyle
Quote from: Lar on 08/31/2014 11:17 pmMy guess would be reuse of a liquid fueled first stage with only checkout and replacing consumables, no refurbishment, will be the first first. I think it will be by YE 2016. yes I completely forgot about about reuse. But that's not really spaceflight. I was thinking more from a missions perspective.
Quote from: oiorionsbelt on 08/31/2014 11:25 pmQuote from: Lar on 08/31/2014 11:17 pmMy guess would be reuse of a liquid fueled first stage with only checkout and replacing consumables, no refurbishment, will be the first first. I think it will be by YE 2016. yes I completely forgot about about reuse. But that's not really spaceflight. I was thinking more from a missions perspective.Not really spaceflight? Hmph. Well you may want to change the thread title to make it more mission centric.
SpaceX, unmanned lunar free return, NET 2020. Manned 2025.They have the punk of Apollo, minus the bucks of Apollo, minus the wizened gremlin whack-a-mole of the assured launch mic.Nevermind. You appear to mean firsts in class of action, itself, not class of participant.
F9 1st stage doesn't even go suborbital, no? I changed the title
The first US entity to land an unmanned rover on the Moon may well be commercial.
I would be looking at 2017 for lunar free return from spx
Quote from: Avron on 09/01/2014 12:12 amI would be looking at 2017 for lunar free return from spxDidn't Apollo 13 use a Lunar free trajectory return?
Quote from: oiorionsbelt on 09/01/2014 12:32 amQuote from: Avron on 09/01/2014 12:12 amI would be looking at 2017 for lunar free return from spxDidn't Apollo 13 use a Lunar free trajectory return?That wasn't the original plan. But good point.
Quote from: Lar on 09/01/2014 12:36 amQuote from: oiorionsbelt on 09/01/2014 12:32 amQuote from: Avron on 09/01/2014 12:12 amI would be looking at 2017 for lunar free return from spxDidn't Apollo 13 use a Lunar free trajectory return?That wasn't the original plan. But good point.and Zond 4 did it first.
The moon feels fairly ruled out of most flags and footprints things no? something more exploitative would be a first.. ISRU? Polar ice?
Quote from: edkyle99 on 08/31/2014 11:13 pmMy guesses would be: 1. Commercial satellite refueling. 2. Commercial space junk safing or de-orbiting.These offer the potential, in theory at least, of profit. - Ed KyleEd, who do you see as pursuing those goals?
The moon feels fairly ruled out of most flags and footprints things no? something more exploitative would be a first.. ISRU? Polar ice?I could see a man tended station being done commercially first, we haven't had one of those, I don't count intermittent habitation.
Complete with Advertising Banner or Billboard. After all, you need to mark your turf, or regolith in this case.