Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Iridium NEXT 6 with GRACE-FO : NET May 22, 2018 - DISCUSSION  (Read 112904 times)

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8166
  • Liked: 6836
  • Likes Given: 2972
Separate subject.
Sometime before launch, during LOX loading, there was significant venting from the TEL.  Big vapor clouds.
Something comes out along with the vapor, arcing downward under gravity, leaving more vapor trails behind.
My guess, posted to the UPDATES thread, was that it was bits of LOX being spewed.
It was not a judgment,   I was not saying anything was wrong or unexpected.  It's just something I had not noticed before.
I was told that any LOX being released would be a safety issue and wouldn't happen.

Does anyone here have insight into the nature of this?

When the webcast is up on YouTube perhaps a screenshot can be captured.

Occasional large vents have been seen before. What you're describing doesn't sound unusual.

Not a large vent cloud.
Something solid or liquid and cold.  Dense enough to fall like a stone but dissipating as it falls.
Again, I am not saying it's bad or different, just something I have not noticed on previous launches.
Have been told it cannot be LOX.
But what could it be?

edit:  The YouTube video starts at under T-1:00 so doesn't go back far enough to see this.

I've seen the same thing on recent launches. Looks like a spurt of LOX that evaporates as it falls. Watch the last several minutes of the last few launches; I'm sure you'll see something similar on at least one or two of them. Visibility and apparent size of the vent event almost certainly depends greatly on ambient temperature, humidity and lighting.

It's fairly common on all launches since SpaceX switched to densified propellant. I don't remember seeing it at all before then.

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Happy faces all around congrats! Thanks for the great coverage team NSF! :)
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Online cwr

Separate subject.
Sometime before launch, during LOX loading, there was significant venting from the TEL.  Big vapor clouds.
Something comes out along with the vapor, arcing downward under gravity, leaving more vapor trails behind.
My guess, posted to the UPDATES thread, was that it was bits of LOX being spewed.
It was not a judgment,   I was not saying anything was wrong or unexpected.  It's just something I had not noticed before.
I was told that any LOX being released would be a safety issue and wouldn't happen.

Does anyone here have insight into the nature of this?

When the webcast is up on YouTube perhaps a screenshot can be captured.

Occasional large vents have been seen before. What you're describing doesn't sound unusual.

Not a large vent cloud.
Something solid or liquid and cold.  Dense enough to fall like a stone but dissipating as it falls.
Again, I am not saying it's bad or different, just something I have not noticed on previous launches.
Have been told it cannot be LOX.
But what could it be?

edit:  The YouTube video starts at under T-1:00 so doesn't go back far enough to see this.

I've seen the same thing on recent launches. Looks like a spurt of LOX that evaporates as it falls. Watch the last several minutes of the last few launches; I'm sure you'll see something similar on at least one or two of them. Visibility and apparent size of the vent event almost certainly depends greatly on ambient temperature, humidity and lighting.

During the webcast, the announcer said a large vent was about to happen and it was caused when they flushed
the piping on the TEL [I've watched all but one F9 launch live and I'd never heard of that flushing before].
Also the timing was a little strange for that event, since they are normally still topping off LOX until about T-30secs and this statement was about T-2mins (in my recollection). I'm maybe misremembering exactly
what was said but at the time I thought "that's the explanation for the large vent that is the familiar
sign that we're close to launch".
I can't correlate the time of this flushing with the possible LOX plume being discussed without going back
and listening/watching that part of the webcast. Maybe this triggers the recollection of others?

Carl

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
Iridium sats at 86.71 degree inclination.  I need to learn how to do the TLE conversion for the orbit height.

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5353
Separate subject.
Sometime before launch, during LOX loading, there was significant venting from the TEL.  Big vapor clouds.
Something comes out along with the vapor, arcing downward under gravity, leaving more vapor trails behind.
My guess, posted to the UPDATES thread, was that it was bits of LOX being spewed.
It was not a judgment,   I was not saying anything was wrong or unexpected.  It's just something I had not noticed before.
I was told that any LOX being released would be a safety issue and wouldn't happen.

Does anyone here have insight into the nature of this?

When the webcast is up on YouTube perhaps a screenshot can be captured.

Occasional large vents have been seen before. What you're describing doesn't sound unusual.

Not a large vent cloud.
Something solid or liquid and cold.  Dense enough to fall like a stone but dissipating as it falls.
Again, I am not saying it's bad or different, just something I have not noticed on previous launches.
Have been told it cannot be LOX.  (Even had the comment edited out by a mod, as is his right.)
But what could it be?

A screenshot would help.

A collage of stills with the feature in question circled in red.
It is more evident when watching the video.
Gas venting puffs out.  The tips of these fall under gravity and dissipate.

edit: Could it be air liquefied by the below-boiling-point vented GOX?
« Last Edit: 05/22/2018 11:48 pm by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline Helodriver

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1082
  • Liked: 5992
  • Likes Given: 705
Took advantage of the brief clear window to shoot a daylight streak of Iridium/Grace arcing over the Santa Ynez Mountains. A fine day!

Offline AncientU

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6257
  • Liked: 4164
  • Likes Given: 6078
Separate subject.
Sometime before launch, during LOX loading, there was significant venting from the TEL.  Big vapor clouds.
Something comes out along with the vapor, arcing downward under gravity, leaving more vapor trails behind.
My guess, posted to the UPDATES thread, was that it was bits of LOX being spewed.
It was not a judgment,   I was not saying anything was wrong or unexpected.  It's just something I had not noticed before.
I was told that any LOX being released would be a safety issue and wouldn't happen.

Does anyone here have insight into the nature of this?

When the webcast is up on YouTube perhaps a screenshot can be captured.

Occasional large vents have been seen before. What you're describing doesn't sound unusual.

Not a large vent cloud.
Something solid or liquid and cold.  Dense enough to fall like a stone but dissipating as it falls.
Again, I am not saying it's bad or different, just something I have not noticed on previous launches.
Have been told it cannot be LOX.  (Even had the comment edited out by a mod, as is his right.)
But what could it be?

A screenshot would help.

A collage of stills with the feature in question circled in red.
It is more evident when watching the video.
Gas venting puffs out.  The tips of these fall under gravity and dissipate.

Those are streams of liquid oxygen.  The still-liquid phase falls like water would, but evaporating/boiling-off as it falls through the relatively hot air.
« Last Edit: 05/23/2018 12:11 am by AncientU »
"If we shared everything [we are working on] people would think we are insane!"
-- SpaceX friend of mlindner

Offline rickl

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 899
  • Pennsylvania, USA
  • Liked: 146
  • Likes Given: 150
I guess it must not have been important since no one else has mentioned it, but I wonder what was the snake-like piece of debris that separated from the second stage at SECO-1.  It looked like a piece of hose or cable.
The Space Age is just starting to get interesting.

Offline seruriermarshal

  • Member
  • Member
  • Posts: 44
  • Liked: 30
  • Likes Given: 8
Congratulations to SpaceX

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
I guess it must not have been important since no one else has mentioned it, but I wonder what was the snake-like piece of debris that separated from the second stage at SECO-1.  It looked like a piece of hose or cable.

It might also just have been LOX that froze in that shape.

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
A camera was toasted by the Falcon 9 today...  ;D  https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10156135691076233&id=506906232

Quote
Brilliant NASA photographer Bill Ingalls always produces great images. He always asks himself, how close can I put my camera to the rocket launch for the best shot? The rocket answered.

Online LouScheffer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3452
  • Liked: 6263
  • Likes Given: 882
Iridium sats at 86.71 degree inclination.  I need to learn how to do the TLE conversion for the orbit height.

Here's how:
#The the 8th field of line 2, that's the revolutions per day.  From this find the semi-major axis in km from Kepler's law and GM for earth:
sma = (8681663.653/rpd)^(2/3); print "sma=", sma;

#The fifth field is the eccentricity.   It's of the form "0.XXXXXX", but only the XXXXXX  is given, the "0." is assumed
e = ("0." $5) + 0.0; print "e=", e;

#Now given the semi-major axi and the eccentricity, find the apogee and perigee.  These are computed from the center of the Earth, so subtract the
# Earth's radius (6371 km)
p = sma * (1-e) - 6371; print "perigee =", p;
a = sma * (1+e) - 6371; print " apogee =", a;

Here's an example to try:
1 26934U 01044A   14144.63398148  .00000000  00000-0  00000-0 0    02
2 26934  97.0335 276.7823 0001902 124.8490  48.3766 15.68826283    01
sma= 6740.4
e= 0.0001902
perigee = 368.114
apogee = 370.678

« Last Edit: 05/23/2018 12:38 am by LouScheffer »

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
Iridium sats at 86.71 degree inclination.  I need to learn how to do the TLE conversion for the orbit height.

Here's how:
#The the 8th field of line 2, that's the revolutions per day.  From this find the semi-major axis in km from Kepler's law and GM for earth:
sma = (8681663.653/rpd)^(2/3); print "sma=", sma;

#The fifth field is the eccentricity.   It's of the form "0.XXXXXX", but only the XXXXXX  is given, the "0." is assumed
e = ("0." $5) + 0.0; print "e=", e;

#Now given the semi-major axi and the eccentricity, find the apogee and perigee.  These are computed from the center of the Earth, so subtract the
# Earth's radius (6371 km)
p = sma * (1-e) - 6371; print "perigee =", p;
a = sma * (1+e) - 6371; print " apogee =", a;

Here's an example to try:
1 26934U 01044A   14144.63398148  .00000000  00000-0  00000-0 0    02
2 26934  97.0335 276.7823 0001902 124.8490  48.3766 15.68826283    01
sma= 6740.4
e= 0.0001902
perigee = 368.114
apogee = 370.678

1 43478U 18047C   18142.95257369  .00000034  00000-0  00000+0 0  9994
2 43478  86.7101 239.9250 0153544 332.9069 117.8366 14.89094608    17

I got 504x718, which doesn't seem right (or maybe I just can't do math tonight)

edit:  I got 498x712 when I put it in a spreadsheet, which preserved a few more digits between calculations than I did manually  :)
« Last Edit: 05/23/2018 02:28 am by gongora »

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8166
  • Liked: 6836
  • Likes Given: 2972
I guess it must not have been important since no one else has mentioned it, but I wonder what was the snake-like piece of debris that separated from the second stage at SECO-1.  It looked like a piece of hose or cable.

It might also just have been LOX that froze in that shape.

It was flexible and sitting on the (probably very hot) GG exhaust duct, so I rather doubt frozen LOX. Didn't look like it was connected to anything, so not hose or cable. Maybe a piece of mylar tape or insulation?

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
I guess it must not have been important since no one else has mentioned it, but I wonder what was the snake-like piece of debris that separated from the second stage at SECO-1.  It looked like a piece of hose or cable.

It might also just have been LOX that froze in that shape.

It was flexible and sitting on the (probably very hot) GG exhaust duct, so I rather doubt frozen LOX. Didn't look like it was connected to anything, so not hose or cable. Maybe a piece of mylar tape or insulation?

It’s not that hot. Frozen LOX (in snow clump form) is commonly seen around it.

Online LouScheffer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3452
  • Liked: 6263
  • Likes Given: 882
Iridium sats at 86.71 degree inclination.  I need to learn how to do the TLE conversion for the orbit height.

Here's how:
#The the 8th field of line 2, that's the revolutions per day.  From this find the semi-major axis in km from Kepler's law and GM for earth:
sma = (8681663.653/rpd)^(2/3); print "sma=", sma;

#The fifth field is the eccentricity.   It's of the form "0.XXXXXX", but only the XXXXXX  is given, the "0." is assumed
e = ("0." $5) + 0.0; print "e=", e;

#Now given the semi-major axi and the eccentricity, find the apogee and perigee.  These are computed from the center of the Earth, so subtract the
# Earth's radius (6371 km)
p = sma * (1-e) - 6371; print "perigee =", p;
a = sma * (1+e) - 6371; print " apogee =", a;

1 43478U 18047C   18142.95257369  .00000034  00000-0  00000+0 0  9994
2 43478  86.7101 239.9250 0153544 332.9069 117.8366 14.89094608    17

I got 504x718, which doesn't seem right (or maybe I just can't do math tonight)
I get:
1 43478U 18047C   18142.95257369  .00000034  00000-0  00000+0 0  9994
2 43478  86.7101 239.9250 0153544 332.9069 117.8366 14.89094608    17
sma= 6978.9
e= 0.0153544
perigee = 500.745
apogee = 715.059

So I think your calculation is correct.  The perigee makes sense; little else is possible given the initial orbit and the 8 second burn.  The apogee is a little short of the 780 km quoted in the NSF article, but if it's like ISS, they start a little low so the satellites will run a little faster than the desired altitude.  Then when they reach the desired spot in the plane they raise the orbit and circularize.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
Hmmm, I guess it is around there.

Tweet from Jonathan McDowell:
Quote
GRACE-FO satellites cataloged in 483 x 505 km orbits, Iridium 110, 147, 152, 161 and 162 cataloged in 494 x 710 km orbits. The Falcon 9 second stage was deorbited  after deploying the sats.

Offline JimO

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
  • Texas, USA
  • Liked: 482
  • Likes Given: 195
Hmmm, I guess it is around there.

Tweet from Jonathan McDowell:
Quote
GRACE-FO satellites cataloged in 483 x 505 km orbits, Iridium 110, 147, 152, 161 and 162 cataloged in 494 x 710 km orbits. The Falcon 9 second stage was deorbited  after deploying the sats.

Any reports of observations of the deorbit burn?

Offline speedevil

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4406
  • Fife
  • Liked: 2762
  • Likes Given: 3369
A camera was toasted by the Falcon 9 today...  ;D  https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10156135691076233&id=506906232

Quote
Brilliant NASA photographer Bill Ingalls always produces great images. He always asks himself, how close can I put my camera to the rocket launch for the best shot? The rocket answered.
https://imgur.com/gallery/yqehN3W - only good pic it got.
I guess distance was fine, being in the trajectory of the flame duct wasn't.

Offline Bananas_on_Mars

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 554
  • Liked: 448
  • Likes Given: 282
There were reports of some bush fire around the pad so they couldn't get their remote cameras. From the picture, burning grass/bushes might be to blame instead of the rocket IMO.
« Last Edit: 05/23/2018 12:13 pm by Bananas_on_Mars »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0