Jadebenn has previously indicated willingness to make bets related to Starship, it seems that those bets were never finalized, so here is what I would be willing to bet with him (or anyone else willing to take these bets) I prefer leaving SLS comparisons off so things like SLS delays and work stoppages won't affect the maximum timeline of resolving the bet, not that I expect it to matter:1. Starship flies to orbit this year (NLT December 31, 2020) I'd bet about $20 or equivalent value, a typical bet for a friendly "beer bet"2. Starship flies to orbit by the end of next year (NLT December 31, 2021) I'd bet a lot. The highest value I can think of that stays within the bounds of a friendly bet is lifetime L2 membership. I already have this, but upon me winning, I would accept an equivalent donation to the L2 student scholarship fund in my name.For definitions, orbit means fully travel at least once around the world, no straight up and down flight counts unless it stays up for around 24 or more hours to land back near the launch site. (because this clearly exceeds the capability of reaching orbit) Once around and land back near the launch site counts even with unsuccessful re-entry, but if this single orbit was not the plan such as due to a failure on the way up it doesn't count. Stranded Starship in unplanned orbit due to failure on the way up also would not count.Terms, definitions, and bet amounts negotiable.
Actually, starting from the beginning of the thread and reviewing, since I have a bet pending once we finalize the details, I think we have some settle-able bets at this point.Probably should go through and try to summarize resolved bets. Apropos of nothing at all:https://getpocket.com/explore/item/the-gambler-who-cracked-the-horse-racing-codeFascinating read and completely irrelevant to what we're doing here. (I think?)
Quote from: meberbs on 04/19/2020 10:26 pm1. Starship flies to orbit this year (NLT December 31, 2020) I'd bet about $20 or equivalent value, a typical bet for a friendly "beer bet"...I will take your bet #1. As for the definition of 'orbit', why not simply: Starship achieves orbital velocity. The nature or lack of reentry is irrelevant for purposes of the bet.
1. Starship flies to orbit this year (NLT December 31, 2020) I'd bet about $20 or equivalent value, a typical bet for a friendly "beer bet"...
Quote from: dglow on 04/20/2020 02:49 amQuote from: meberbs on 04/19/2020 10:26 pm1. Starship flies to orbit this year (NLT December 31, 2020) I'd bet about $20 or equivalent value, a typical bet for a friendly "beer bet"...I will take your bet #1. As for the definition of 'orbit', why not simply: Starship achieves orbital velocity. The nature or lack of reentry is irrelevant for purposes of the bet.I was mostly overcompensating for fairly unlikely cases. Your definition gets at the core of the matter.Do you have any preferences on the exact stakes? I know some people prefer payments in person (I live in CO)Otherwise, its a bet.
<virtual handshake>
Quote from: dglow on 04/22/2020 03:59 am<virtual handshake><shakes>
I've bet [J]im a 24-case of beer against a bottle of vodka that SpaceX will fly 48 or more missions an average of 4 per month on reused rockets in 2024. Expendable rockets don't count, and neither do first-time-flying ones.
Quote from: dcporter on 07/16/2014 06:27 pmI've bet [J]im a 24-case of beer against a bottle of vodka that SpaceX will fly 48 or more missions an average of 4 per month on reused rockets in 2024. Expendable rockets don't count, and neither do first-time-flying ones.Happy Anniversary Jim!Okay we've crossed the halfway point. I can see this playing out a few ways: basically status quo, where I lose by a factor of two or three; I win because Starlink is a wild success and Starship isn't running yet; or I lose because Starship has taken over Starlink launching but hasn't really gotten into its sci fi thousands-of-launches-per-conjunction cadence yet.
Quote from: dcporter on 07/17/2020 12:38 amQuote from: dcporter on 07/16/2014 06:27 pmI've bet [J]im a 24-case of beer against a bottle of vodka that SpaceX will fly 48 or more missions an average of 4 per month on reused rockets in 2024. Expendable rockets don't count, and neither do first-time-flying ones.Happy Anniversary Jim!Okay we've crossed the halfway point. I can see this playing out a few ways: basically status quo, where I lose by a factor of two or three; I win because Starlink is a wild success and Starship isn't running yet; or I lose because Starship has taken over Starlink launching but hasn't really gotten into its sci fi thousands-of-launches-per-conjunction cadence yet.6 out of 10 years is the halfway point?Or are you referring to the first anniversary of the halfway point? I like this bet, except considering vodka as a prize. Still, 48 is a pretty big number.
Quote from: Comga on 08/08/2020 10:01 pmQuote from: dcporter on 07/17/2020 12:38 amQuote from: dcporter on 07/16/2014 06:27 pmI've bet [J]im a 24-case of beer against a bottle of vodka that SpaceX will fly 48 or more missions an average of 4 per month on reused rockets in 2024. Expendable rockets don't count, and neither do first-time-flying ones.Happy Anniversary Jim!Okay we've crossed the halfway point. I can see this playing out a few ways: basically status quo, where I lose by a factor of two or three; I win because Starlink is a wild success and Starship isn't running yet; or I lose because Starship has taken over Starlink launching but hasn't really gotten into its sci fi thousands-of-launches-per-conjunction cadence yet.6 out of 10 years is the halfway point?Or are you referring to the first anniversary of the halfway point? I like this bet, except considering vodka as a prize. Still, 48 is a pretty big number. Whoa, 48 is a huge number for the F9. They are trying really hard, but still with weather and ASDS cycles, 48 will seem to require more boosters and 3 pads, or 2 pads and 3 HIFs.Getting the west coast launching Starlink flights would go a long way to help this out.
Quote from: wannamoonbase on 03/12/2021 07:49 pmQuote from: Comga on 08/08/2020 10:01 pmQuote from: dcporter on 07/17/2020 12:38 amQuote from: dcporter on 07/16/2014 06:27 pmI've bet [J]im a 24-case of beer against a bottle of vodka that SpaceX will fly 48 or more missions an average of 4 per month on reused rockets in 2024. Expendable rockets don't count, and neither do first-time-flying ones.Happy Anniversary Jim!Okay we've crossed the halfway point. I can see this playing out a few ways: basically status quo, where I lose by a factor of two or three; I win because Starlink is a wild success and Starship isn't running yet; or I lose because Starship has taken over Starlink launching but hasn't really gotten into its sci fi thousands-of-launches-per-conjunction cadence yet.6 out of 10 years is the halfway point?Or are you referring to the first anniversary of the halfway point? I like this bet, except considering vodka as a prize. Still, 48 is a pretty big number. Whoa, 48 is a huge number for the F9. They are trying really hard, but still with weather and ASDS cycles, 48 will seem to require more boosters and 3 pads, or 2 pads and 3 HIFs.Getting the west coast launching Starlink flights would go a long way to help this out.Don't they have 45 planned for this year? So 48 by 2024 doesn't seem that unrealistic.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9#Launch_history
Quote from: Hernalt on 07/17/2014 07:21 amLar. Cleaned it up. Hopefully no language, all math. I go with FH means 3 cores. Any ONE core delay can delay two additional. How does this look? For all years prior to 2025:X * 1 core* (F9 + derivatives + variants) + Y * 1 core* (F9R + derivatives + variants) + Z * 3 core * (FH + derivatives + variants) < 24 / year.Done. If at any time that formula exceeds 24, you owe me a bottle of 15 year or older single malt, you can pick the particular malt and vintage. If for all years prior to 2025 it never does, I owe you the same, except that I can pick[1]1 - this is to prevent the selection of some exceedingly pricey ones that I just can't afford.. for example this onehttp://www.thewhiskyexchange.com/P-16442.aspx is 350 pounds! Too rich for me.
Lar. Cleaned it up. Hopefully no language, all math. I go with FH means 3 cores. Any ONE core delay can delay two additional. How does this look? For all years prior to 2025:X * 1 core* (F9 + derivatives + variants) + Y * 1 core* (F9R + derivatives + variants) + Z * 3 core * (FH + derivatives + variants) < 24 / year.