Musk: If we don't win NASA contract, we'll be OKhttp://www.cnbc.com/id/101767056?__source=yahoo%7Cfinance%7Cheadline%7Cheadline%7Cstory&par=yahoo&doc=101767056%7CMusk:%20If%20we%20don%27t%20win%20NAS"It's possible that we may not win the commercial crew contract... we'll do our best to continue on our own, with our own money," Must said. "We would not be where we are today without the help of NASA."
Quote from: Prober on 06/17/2014 09:14 pmMusk: If we don't win NASA contract, we'll be OKhttp://www.cnbc.com/id/101767056?__source=yahoo%7Cfinance%7Cheadline%7Cheadline%7Cstory&par=yahoo&doc=101767056%7CMusk:%20If%20we%20don%27t%20win%20NAS"It's possible that we may not win the commercial crew contract... we'll do our best to continue on our own, with our own money," Must said. "We would not be where we are today without the help of NASA."I agree with the strategy, but is it smart to say that publicly before the contract is awarded?
Quote from: Kabloona on 06/17/2014 03:21 pmWas that Rep. Dana Rohrabacher leading the cheer for SpaceX?yes, on RT America no less
Was that Rep. Dana Rohrabacher leading the cheer for SpaceX?
Quote from: Prober on 06/17/2014 05:07 pmQuote from: Kabloona on 06/17/2014 03:21 pmWas that Rep. Dana Rohrabacher leading the cheer for SpaceX?yes, on RT America no less"If we just left it up to NASA", he says. Problem is, Congress has never "just left it up to NASA". I think NASA could do things a lot more economically and efficiently if Congress wasn't continually playing games with the purse strings.No, they would never be as efficient as SpaceX, but at least acknowledge that the honorable congressman is part of the reason for that large differential in efficiency.