I would expect rain is pumped away eventually, and the level of waterin the trench is strictly monitored and controlled.
Quote from: jongoff on 04/18/2014 08:35 pmFalcon 9 stage 2 will be deorbited SW of Australia shortly; first time the second stage has been deorbited on an F9 flightI wonder whether this is being driven more by orbital debris considerations, wanting to practice relights on the second stage (building up experience for GTO missions), or if they're trying to use it to start gathering data for F9R upper stage reuse, or something else entirely.
Falcon 9 stage 2 will be deorbited SW of Australia shortly; first time the second stage has been deorbited on an F9 flight
Quote from: jongoff on 04/18/2014 08:37 pmQuote from: jongoff on 04/18/2014 08:35 pmFalcon 9 stage 2 will be deorbited SW of Australia shortly; first time the second stage has been deorbited on an F9 flightI wonder whether this is being driven more by orbital debris considerations, wanting to practice relights on the second stage (building up experience for GTO missions), or if they're trying to use it to start gathering data for F9R upper stage reuse, or something else entirely.If the burn is to depletion it gives a data point on what total vehicle performance really is.
Elon Musk @elonmuskOrbit insertion and Dragon deploy all good. Falcon reentry burn also good. Waiting for landing data from tracking plane.
Any links for the presser? NASA TV?
Quote from: Chris Bergin on 04/18/2014 07:57 pmBlimey SpaceX, you popular! Sorry.........it's not like I put flyers out or anything....
Blimey SpaceX, you popular!
Quote from: docmordrid on 04/18/2014 08:44 pmAny links for the presser? NASA TV?Yep, NASA TV http://www.ustream.tv/nasahdtv but my brain fried earlier, so I'm not sure what time. Edit: Avron's got it. 5pm Eastern.....he had a post, not sure where it is now!
Quote from: Antares on 04/18/2014 08:43 pmQuote from: jongoff on 04/18/2014 08:37 pmQuote from: jongoff on 04/18/2014 08:35 pmFalcon 9 stage 2 will be deorbited SW of Australia shortly; first time the second stage has been deorbited on an F9 flightI wonder whether this is being driven more by orbital debris considerations, wanting to practice relights on the second stage (building up experience for GTO missions), or if they're trying to use it to start gathering data for F9R upper stage reuse, or something else entirely.If the burn is to depletion it gives a data point on what total vehicle performance really is.They don't want to burn to depletion, instead the goal is to put the debris in a predefined zone in the Pacific.
@elonmusk 1mLast known state for rocket boost stage is 360 m/s, Mach 1.1, 8.5 km altitude and roll rate close to zero (v important!)
2. They can still burn to depletion, while putting it in the predefined zone in the Pacific.
By definition, burning to depletion and putting the second stage into a predefined "landing zone" in the Pacific are mutually exclusive, due to uncertainty in propellant consumption.
Quote from: Avron on 04/18/2014 08:50 pm@elonmusk 1mLast known state for rocket boost stage is 360 m/s, Mach 1.1, 8.5 km altitude and roll rate close to zero (v important!)Hard to imagine a soft touchdown, this time anyway, if the last known state had the F9 at 28,000' going straight down at over Mach 1. Still, the very low roll rate is encouraging, and one can't wait to see yesterday's "Grasshopper II" video recreated after a live F9 launch.
Quote from: AJA on 04/18/2014 08:56 pm2. They can still burn to depletion, while putting it in the predefined zone in the Pacific.By definition, burning to depletion and putting the second stage into a predefined "landing zone" in the Pacific are mutually exclusive, due to uncertainty in propellant consumption.It's kind of like saying " drive your car until it runs out of gas" and also "park the car carefully in the garage".