-
#1260
by
manboy
on 12 Sep, 2013 02:25
-
The live link is no longer relevant to that session, that session has now been archived under this video.
SpaceX section starts at 45 minutes.
-
#1261
by
Mader Levap
on 12 Sep, 2013 09:05
-
-
#1262
by
Helodriver
on 12 Sep, 2013 15:39
-
-
#1263
by
llanitedave
on 12 Sep, 2013 16:08
-
That really IS a pencil! With the eraser side up!
-
#1264
by
parham55
on 12 Sep, 2013 16:14
-
-
#1265
by
AS-503
on 12 Sep, 2013 16:30
-
That pic makes me wonder what the arrangement will look like for the FH.
-
#1266
by
Galactic Penguin SST
on 12 Sep, 2013 16:45
-
Can anyone add a comparison picture for the F9 v1.1 with the F9 v1.0 and the original "white pencil rocket" - the Zenit series (Zenit-2 plus the Sea Launch Zenit-3SL)? Thanks!
-
#1267
by
Lars_J
on 12 Sep, 2013 16:48
-
Nice find... Here the images are attached:
It really doesn't look as disproportionate (tall & thin) that some thought it would. (IMO)
-
#1268
by
thydusk666
on 12 Sep, 2013 17:04
-
That 1st stage LOX tank appears to be full.
Could they be planning for a WDR if no hot fire today?
-
#1269
by
newpylong
on 12 Sep, 2013 17:06
-
Looks more disproportionate that I thought...
-
#1270
by
Lars_J
on 12 Sep, 2013 17:07
-
That 1st stage LOX tank appears to be full.
Could they be planning for a WDR if no hot fire today?
Someone mentioned in on of the mission threads that the hot fire was aborted due to a pad LOX leak. So this could explain the partially full LOX tank - or it was taken during loading or off-loading of propellants.
-
#1271
by
meekGee
on 12 Sep, 2013 17:18
-
-
#1272
by
Lars_J
on 12 Sep, 2013 17:20
-
Looks more disproportionate that I thought...
Alright...

Here is the main event in the "odd proportioned rocket" fight: Compare and discuss!
(images roughly to scale, as the SRB diameter is very close to the F9 core diameter)
-
#1273
by
Sesquipedalian
on 12 Sep, 2013 17:22
-
Here is the main event in the "odd proportioned rocket" fight:
Did you intend to link to or attach an image?
-
#1274
by
Lars_J
on 12 Sep, 2013 17:25
-
Here is the main event in the "odd proportioned rocket" fight:
Did you intend to link to or attach an image?
Yes, look again. I forgot to attach it initially.
-
#1275
by
corrodedNut
on 12 Sep, 2013 17:35
-
Our first good look at the hold-downs and 1st stage umbilicals. The hold-downs look similar to F9 1.0, but the umbilicals (arrow) no longer share a location and swing arm, they have their own. If the erector is at 12 o'clock, then the hold-downs are at 12, 3, 6, and 9; and the umbilcals are at ~1(presumed, not seen) and ~7.
This photo:
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=31734.msg1095106#msg1095106 also shows the umbilical disconnects
-
#1276
by
woods170
on 12 Sep, 2013 18:22
-
-
#1277
by
Lars_J
on 12 Sep, 2013 18:32
-
Our first good look at the hold-downs and 1st stage umbilicals. The hold-downs look similar to F9 1.0, but the umbilicals (arrow) no longer share a location and swing arm, they have their own. If the erector is at 12 o'clock, then the hold-downs are at 12, 3, 6, and 9; and the umbilcals are at ~1(presumed, not seen) and ~7.
This photo: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=31734.msg1095106#msg1095106 also shows the umbilical disconnects
Yep, and this slide image of a F9v1.1 prepped for transport shows the umbilical port as well:
-
#1278
by
dglow
on 12 Sep, 2013 18:35
-
Looks more disproportionate that I thought...
Alright...
Here is the main event in the "odd proportioned rocket" fight: Compare and discuss!
(images roughly to scale, as the SRB diameter is very close to the F9 core diameter)
Great comparison photo - thank you.
And wow... F1.1 makes the Ares look fuugly.
-
#1279
by
kirghizstan
on 12 Sep, 2013 18:39
-
Looks more disproportionate that I thought...
Alright...
Here is the main event in the "odd proportioned rocket" fight: Compare and discuss!
(images roughly to scale, as the SRB diameter is very close to the F9 core diameter)
Great comparison photo - thank you.
And wow... F1.1 makes the Ares look fuugly.
ares made ares fugly