Author Topic: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS-2 (SpX-2) LAUNCH and FD-1 UPDATES  (Read 278940 times)

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 677
  • Likes Given: 195
But isn't up to the Falcon to protect the Dragon thermally on the way up?

Nope. That's true for a payload in a faring, but Dragon is on its own thermally (and IIRC, for power and comm).

We do know that the solar actuators were colder than anticipated, so that might be a clue.

See reply #62 from this morning; there was also a report of a low-temp indication for the flight computer. Hmm.

That was the Falcon 9 flight computer, not Dragon flight computer, I believe. Not the same.

Offline Chris Bergin

Quote
Elon Musk ‏@elonmusk

Thruster pods one through four are now operating nominally. Preparing to raise orbit. All systems green.

That's all sorted then! Very good.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline LegendCJS

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 575
  • Boston, MA
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 2
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Why would they need to stir the tank if it is well-insulated and perhaps heated? And how could it cause an explosion with storable oxidiser?

I wonder if the fuel / oxidiser lines have insulation and heaters, as on the Shuttle.

Towards end of presser, Elon said ox tanks are at 70F, so freezing seems unlikely. Stuck check valve(s) more likely (IMO).
Surely you mean 70K.
Remember: if we want this whole space thing to work out we have to optimize for cost!

Online Elmar Moelzer

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
  • Liked: 855
  • Likes Given: 1075
Nice!

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
That was the Falcon 9 flight computer, not Dragon flight computer, I believe. Not the same.

And what I'm speculating is that it was unexpected cooling during ascent (due to the clouds?) that caused the check valves to become stuck (thermal contraction?).

Offline John44

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3887
  • Netherlands
    • space-multimedia
  • Liked: 258
  • Likes Given: 0
NASA Teleconference - Update SpaceX/Dragon-2 (*** bad audio quality *** )
http://www.space-multimedia.nl.eu.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8106


Offline Kabloona

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4847
  • Velocitas Eradico
  • Fortress of Solitude
  • Liked: 3432
  • Likes Given: 741
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Why would they need to stir the tank if it is well-insulated and perhaps heated? And how could it cause an explosion with storable oxidiser?

I wonder if the fuel / oxidiser lines have insulation and heaters, as on the Shuttle.

Towards end of presser, Elon said ox tanks are at 70F, so freezing seems unlikely. Stuck check valve(s) more likely (IMO).
Surely you mean 70K.

No, MMH/NTO are not cryo. The "ox" is NTO, not LOX.
« Last Edit: 03/01/2013 08:15 pm by Kabloona »

Offline Space Pete

Ace job on the thrusters! SpaceX's anomaly resolution impressed me, they handled it like seasoned pros. :)

--------------------

From @Cmdr_Hadfield via Twitter:

Far behind us in the distance we spotted a Dragon roaring up through the clouds, coming to catch us. Amazing. http://pic.twitter.com/gRzR6cGGTg
NASASpaceflight ISS Writer

Offline iamlucky13

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1659
  • Liked: 112
  • Likes Given: 95
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Why would they need to stir the tank if it is well-insulated and perhaps heated? And how could it cause an explosion with storable oxidiser?

I wonder if the fuel / oxidiser lines have insulation and heaters, as on the Shuttle.

Looking past the joke...

The tanks are outside the pressure shell, but obviously inside the TPS blankets, which will limit the radiative cooling rate substantially. Combined with the fact they're fairly dense, even without their own insulation and heaters they're not going to cool very quickly. Lines might be more susceptible, though.

could it be humidity in the He supply?   

That's one of the first ideas that came to my mind.

If the lines weren't fully purged, perhaps the initial pressure drop as the downstream side filled cooled things enough to form some ice crystals. Or perhaps even lines cooled enough during ascent for water contamination to freeze. I have no idea how their tanks are plumbed, but that might explain multiple tanks not pressurizing.

Pure speculation on my part. Plenty of other possibilities, too.

Offline Chris Bergin

CSF President Michael Lopez-Alegria Statement on SpaceX CRS-2 Launch

“The Commercial Spaceflight Federation congratulates SpaceX and NASA for their successful launch of the Falcon 9 rocket this morning,” stated CSF President Michael Lopez-Alegria. “With  launches like this one, the private sector is delivering on its goal of creating a safe, cost-effective U.S. transportation capability to low Earth orbit, and we should expect to see the pace continue to increase in this industry in the coming years. Some difficulties arose with the Dragon capsule in orbit, but hiccups are common in any complicated mission, and I am impressed by the resiliency and ingenuity of the SpaceX engineering team as they work on the problem. I commend the entire team at SpaceX and NASA and I look forward to following Dragon’s progress for the remainder of its journey.”

About Commercial Resupply Services

NASA awarded two contracts for transportation services to Space Exploration Technologies and Orbital Sciences Corporation in December 2008. The Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) contracts procured a total of 20 cargo transportation missions to the ISS through 2015 and are managed by the ISS Transportation Office.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13469
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 11869
  • Likes Given: 11115
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Why would they need to stir the tank if it is well-insulated and perhaps heated? And how could it cause an explosion with storable oxidiser?

I wonder if the fuel / oxidiser lines have insulation and heaters, as on the Shuttle.

Towards end of presser, Elon said ox tanks are at 70F, so freezing seems unlikely. Stuck check valve(s) more likely (IMO).
Surely you mean 70K.

No, MMH/NTO are not cryo. The "ox" is NTO, not LOX.
Right. Also he *said* F (rather than "farenheit", true but F and K don't sound that much a like)
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline paycom

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 129
  • Germany
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 3
Test burn of the Draco thrusters comming up at 21:30 UTC according to capcom.
« Last Edit: 03/01/2013 08:30 pm by paycom »

Offline IRobot

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1311
  • Portugal & Germany
  • Liked: 310
  • Likes Given: 272
Test burn of the Draco thrusters comming up at 21:30 UTC according to capcom.
Any word on Dragon eye opening?

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
KSC media gallery now has a number of launch images posted: http://mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov/search.cfm?cat=225

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
Test burn of the Draco thrusters comming up at 21:30 UTC according to capcom.
Any word on Dragon eye opening?
You mean the GNC door?
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Why would they need to stir the tank if it is well-insulated and perhaps heated? And how could it cause an explosion with storable oxidiser?

I wonder if the fuel / oxidiser lines have insulation and heaters, as on the Shuttle.

Looking past the joke...

The tanks are outside the pressure shell, but obviously inside the TPS blankets, which will limit the radiative cooling rate substantially. Combined with the fact they're fairly dense, even without their own insulation and heaters they're not going to cool very quickly. Lines might be more susceptible, though.

could it be humidity in the He supply?   

That's one of the first ideas that came to my mind.

If the lines weren't fully purged, perhaps the initial pressure drop as the downstream side filled cooled things enough to form some ice crystals. Or perhaps even lines cooled enough during ascent for water contamination to freeze. I have no idea how their tanks are plumbed, but that might explain multiple tanks not pressurizing.

Pure speculation on my part. Plenty of other possibilities, too.

There is the possibility of FOD

Offline demorcef

  • Member
  • Posts: 95
  • SCE to AUX
  • Chicago, IL
  • Liked: 12
  • Likes Given: 35

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
FOD in three pipes simultaneously? IMHO, this screams a design problem with the valves, due to thermal or vibrational issues during ascent.
« Last Edit: 03/01/2013 08:42 pm by simonbp »

Offline Herb Schaltegger

FOD in three pipes simultaneously? IMHO, this screams a design problem with the valves, due to thermal or vibrational issues during ascent.

Or a manufacturing issue with a batch of valves.
Ad astra per aspirin ...

Offline AJA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
  • Per Aspera Ad Ares, Per Aspera Ad Astra
  • India
  • Liked: 146
  • Likes Given: 212
FOD in three pipes simultaneously? IMHO, this screams a design problem with the valves, due to thermal or vibrational issues during ascent.

I'd tend agree with you, but, if they loaded all the tanks from the same contaminated source, FOD in all tanks isn't as unlikely a possibility as you'd think.

EDIT: Yes, or manufacturing issues, as Herb mentions.

The cold flight computer, the clouds are compelling me to think that the 'GO' temperature band for LCC are probably off.
« Last Edit: 03/01/2013 08:51 pm by AJA »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0