Author Topic: LIVE: SpaceX Falcon 9/Dragon CRS-2 (SpX-2) LAUNCH and FD-1 UPDATES  (Read 278937 times)

Offline AJA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
  • Per Aspera Ad Ares, Per Aspera Ad Astra
  • India
  • Liked: 146
  • Likes Given: 212
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Oh wait.. Yeah. Let's never do that again.

---

E - Without a perigee raise burn, Dragon might re-enter in a day or two.

Offline meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14669
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14676
  • Likes Given: 1420
could it be humidity in the He supply?   
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline Chris Bergin

Sunday most likely for docking rather than Saturday.

I'll bet you 10 English pounds sterling it won't be Saturday ;)
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14181
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Sunday most likely for docking rather than Saturday.

I'll bet you 10 English pounds sterling it won't be Saturday ;)

That's a pretty safe bet. ;D


Offline antonioe

  • PONTIFEX MAXIMVS
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1077
  • Virginia is for (space) lovers
  • Liked: 43
  • Likes Given: 0
No Euros, eh?
ARS LONGA, VITA BREVIS...

Offline R7

  • Propulsophile
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2725
    • Don't worry.. we can still be fans of OSC and SNC
  • Liked: 992
  • Likes Given: 668
Frozen NTO? -11C at Florida?
AD·ASTRA·ASTRORVM·GRATIA

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14181
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
No Euros, eh?

I say old boy what are these Euros you speak of.

Offline Chris Bergin

Well done everyone. Was nice to be able to sit back for once and watch about five of you banging away with the transcription :)

So I've updated the launch article:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/03/spacex-milestone-falcon9-launch-dragon-crs2/

And I'll start writing the next article tonight as good L2 info's starting to arrive now.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768
Any thoughts on what would cause 3 out of 4 to fail? That sounds like a systematic error.
AFAIK, Helium tank serves all 8 tanks via separate lines. Blockage likely occurred in one of the main lines valves before the lines split off to there assigned tanks.

Offline Space Pete

So it sounds to me like the biggest hurdle - clearing the helium line to the oxidizer tank in order to pressurize it - has already been overcome. It doesn't sound like there is any good reason why the remaining thruster pods shouldn't come online now.
NASASpaceflight ISS Writer

Offline IRobot

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1311
  • Portugal & Germany
  • Liked: 310
  • Likes Given: 272
Musk: Pod 1 has 5 thrusters; pod 4 has 4.
So that confirms the pods are numbered by rotation. Pod 1 complements 3 and pod 2 complements 4.
Each complement can easily de-orbit.

Offline mmeijeri

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7772
  • Martijn Meijering
  • NL
  • Liked: 397
  • Likes Given: 822
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Why would they need to stir the tank if it is well-insulated and perhaps heated? And how could it cause an explosion with storable oxidiser?

I wonder if the fuel / oxidiser lines have insulation and heaters, as on the Shuttle.
Pro-tip: you don't have to be a jerk if someone doesn't agree with your theories

Offline corrodedNut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Liked: 216
  • Likes Given: 133
Musk: Pod 1 has 5 thrusters; pod 4 has 4.

Yeah, sounds like "pods" 2 and 4 are "quads", and "pods" 1 and 3 are "quints".

Even numbered "pods" have an even number of Dracos, and vice versa.

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14181
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Well done everyone. Was nice to be able to sit back for once and watch about five of you banging away with the transcription :)

So I've updated the launch article:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/03/spacex-milestone-falcon9-launch-dragon-crs2/

And I'll start writing the next article tonight as good L2 info's starting to arrive now.

Was actually quite good doing racing along with that teleconference. :)

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
Was this the only Falcon to have flown through heavy clouds? I wonder if there was some thermal issue on ascent that cause the systemic failure of the check valves...

Offline AJA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
  • Per Aspera Ad Ares, Per Aspera Ad Astra
  • India
  • Liked: 146
  • Likes Given: 212
wait - the He sure as hell didn't freeze.
If the oxidizer froze, how did this prevent the tank from pressurizing?
I can see how it prevented oxidizer from reaching downstream towards the thruste...  Maybe the pressure sensor is downstream from the tank?  this makes little sense.


I can only think of some 'wetting' of the inside of the ox tank near the diaphragm/valve interface with the He tanks. Or even simple thermal contraction and tightening of the same - beyond what was expected, because the whole tank wasn't exposed to the kind of nominal thermal warming that was expected. This is horribly speculative though.

Offline mdo

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 173
  • Liked: 6
  • Likes Given: 5
... In terms of phase angle the two spacecraft currently approach each other at a rate of about 7.8 deg/hour or 185 deg/day (in terms of revs/day: ISS 16.04, Dragon 15.52).

Shouldn't these be reversed?  ISS - 15.52 revs/day, and Dragon 16.04?  Otherwise, how is Dragon overtaking ISS?


Yes, thanks for spotting; original post corrected.

Offline IRobot

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1311
  • Portugal & Germany
  • Liked: 310
  • Likes Given: 272
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Why would they need to stir the tank if it is well-insulated and perhaps heated? And how could it cause an explosion with storable oxidiser?

I wonder if the fuel / oxidiser lines have insulation and heaters, as on the Shuttle.
I think that was an Apollo 13 joke, but not sure :D

Offline Kabloona

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4847
  • Velocitas Eradico
  • Fortress of Solitude
  • Liked: 3432
  • Likes Given: 741
None of this freezing oxidiser would happen if they stirred the tanks.

Why would they need to stir the tank if it is well-insulated and perhaps heated? And how could it cause an explosion with storable oxidiser?

I wonder if the fuel / oxidiser lines have insulation and heaters, as on the Shuttle.

Towards end of presser, Elon said ox tanks are at 70F, so freezing seems unlikely. Stuck check valve(s) more likely (IMO).
« Last Edit: 03/01/2013 07:49 pm by Kabloona »

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14181
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Was this the only Falcon to have flown through heavy clouds? I wonder if there was some thermal issue on ascent that cause the systemic failure of the check valves...

Something to check for the upgraded Falcon?

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1