Why is there a dark spot on the tip of the fairing?
Was the VP there?
Quote from: jpo234 on 12/18/2018 01:36 pmWas the VP there?This tweet says yes:https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1075031761845919744Huge launch for SpaceX today. @VP is there. Critical mission for critical customer (Air Force). And its their 21st (!) and final launch of the year. Webcast getting going now:
Quote from: RDMM2081 on 12/18/2018 01:46 pmQuote from: jpo234 on 12/18/2018 01:36 pmWas the VP there?This tweet says yes:https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1075031761845919744Huge launch for SpaceX today. @VP is there. Critical mission for critical customer (Air Force). And its their 21st (!) and final launch of the year. Webcast getting going now:Ouch. Not a day you want to have a scrub.
Abort with clear audio from countdown net
Did it get to warm or cold?
Quote from: skymech231 on 12/18/2018 01:39 pmDid it get to warm or cold?Out of family sensor, could also mean that the reading was not logical and thus false positive?
Ouch. Not a day you want to have a scrub.
Quote from: jpo234 on 12/18/2018 01:57 pmOuch. Not a day you want to have a scrub.Correction. Not a day you want to blow up a payload.
Quote from: Jakusb on 12/18/2018 02:17 pmQuote from: skymech231 on 12/18/2018 01:39 pmDid it get to warm or cold?Out of family sensor, could also mean that the reading was not logical and thus false positive?Wording was "thermally compensated limits", so that means the temperature reading was outside the specification of the used temp sensor. These sensors are built to compensate any errors (e.g. non-linear) changes in the readings for a specified temperature range. If the temp runs outside this window, the value is no longer accurate. Could be a faulty sensor or a temperature too high at the location. That's what SpaceX engineers now need to check. Worst case would be the need to replace the sensor.
Quote from: LouScheffer on 12/17/2018 06:32 pmWith the press kit, we can now see the sequence of burns:Launch into an LEO x 4000 km orbit (about 2 hour period). Takes LEO + 830 m/s.Wait one hour until apogee, then go 4000 x 20000 km (6.9 hour orbit) . Takes 1960 m/s. Release satellite.Second stage coasts to apogee (3.45 more hours). Then a retrograde burn at -480 m/s to a 100 x 20000 orbit (5.8 hour period). Wait 2.9 hours and re-enter.Total delta-V is about LEO+3270 m/s, as predicted. Re-entry at launch + 6.5 hours, as stated. Satellite needs about 970 m/s to circularize.4000x35000 is a pretty standard second stage graveyard orbit for centaur, so if the deorbit burn is what pushed this expendable, it seems a bit wasteful...
With the press kit, we can now see the sequence of burns:Launch into an LEO x 4000 km orbit (about 2 hour period). Takes LEO + 830 m/s.Wait one hour until apogee, then go 4000 x 20000 km (6.9 hour orbit) . Takes 1960 m/s. Release satellite.Second stage coasts to apogee (3.45 more hours). Then a retrograde burn at -480 m/s to a 100 x 20000 orbit (5.8 hour period). Wait 2.9 hours and re-enter.Total delta-V is about LEO+3270 m/s, as predicted. Re-entry at launch + 6.5 hours, as stated. Satellite needs about 970 m/s to circularize.
Is the 2nd stage de-orbit a requirement from the USAF, or is it a choice by SpaceX? (Or something else?)
Hasn't it been a while since SpaceX has had a hold like this in the final 10-mins of countdown?