I liked the first half of the film, which seemed to be pretty scientifically accurate. Then all hell broke loose and they pulled a Sunshine.
Quote from: Elmar Moelzer on 05/18/2013 07:02 pmYou can already guess that everybody dies in the end. So why bother watching it?Because what is important is not that they died, but what they did while they were alive.
You can already guess that everybody dies in the end. So why bother watching it?
Quote from: Blackstar on 08/08/2013 08:42 pmQuote from: Elmar Moelzer on 05/18/2013 07:02 pmYou can already guess that everybody dies in the end. So why bother watching it?Because what is important is not that they died, but what they did while they were alive.Your observation is worthy of a bumper sticker! To Elmar: I hope your sentiment is confined merely to movies. I like this thread. Maybe I'll start daydreaming about a "nominal" mission screenplay.
It was also a bit hilarious how nobody thought... Hey, an astronaut is drifting away slowly - if only we weren't in a spaceship with thrusters that would allow us to try and go get him.
Quote from: Lars_J on 11/17/2013 06:00 pmIt was also a bit hilarious how nobody thought... Hey, an astronaut is drifting away slowly - if only we weren't in a spaceship with thrusters that would allow us to try and go get him. But that was not the problem. The problem was that his spacesuit was covered in hydrazine and they could not let him in the airlock or he would kill the other crewman and himself and contaminate the airlock. If you watch it again, note that he's dead very soon after he floats away.
The timeline cutting makes it unclear how much time actually passed - didn't he state he had at least 15-30 mins of air left? They could at least have made an effort to catch up to him while figuring out options. Surely hydrazine also evaporates in vacuum conditions, so the toxicity would be reduced over time.Anyway, a contrivance of the plot, for sure. (Just like a certain event in 'gravity')