I wonder if the flight profile represents the way that the DoD conducts or wants to conduct its launches: launch in one direction, then after first stage separation change orbit/inclination multiple times and drop the sat(s) some time before the end of the whole second stage mission to make things harder for an observer.
I wonder if the flight profile represents the way that the DoD conducts or wants to conduct its launches: launch in one direction, then after first stage separation change orbit/inclination multiple times and drop the sat(s) some time before the end of the whole second stage mission to make things harder for an observer.
I have a question about the length of the webcast.
Obviously, they’ll show the early ascent culminating with SECO-1 and the center core touchdown, but what I’m wondering is if they’ll show the second and third burns before ending the webcast at the start of the 3-hour coast.
Is that a possible theory?
I have a question about the length of the webcast.
Obviously, they’ll show the early ascent culminating with SECO-1 and the center core touchdown, but what I’m wondering is if they’ll show the second and third burns before ending the webcast at the start of the 3-hour coast.
Is that a possible theory?
I'm guessing they will do like they usually do and just pause and resume their live coverage as they have anything interesting to show.
[First orbit] 300 km x 860 km x 28.5 deg
[second orbit] 720 km x 720 km x 24 deg
I calculate 597.8 m/s from the first to second orbit [...]
http://www.sworld.com.au/steven/space/orbit.zip
Delta-V calculator by Steven S. Pietrobon. 22 Jun 2019.
Enter negative perigee height to exit program.
Enter negative height for geosynchronous altitude.
Enter initial perigee height (km): 300
Enter initial apogee height (km): 860
Enter required inclination change (deg): 4.5
Enter required perigee height (km): 720
Enter required apogee height (km): 720
[...]
Burn at 860.0 km: theta1 = 3.68 deg, dv1 = 484.3 m/s
Burn at 720.0 km: theta2 = 0.82 deg, dv2 = 113.5 m/s
dv = 597.8 m/sSeems correct, but this is not the way SpaceX will do this, I think, since number of burns is a tighter limit than delta-V. This can be done with one burn - as the 300 x 800 orbit crosses 720km, a single burn can re-direct into a 720x720 at any inclination. The magnitude of this burn will require full 3D trig to figure out, though. I suspect it's comparable.
I have a question about the length of the webcast.
Obviously, they’ll show the early ascent culminating with SECO-1 and the center core touchdown, but what I’m wondering is if they’ll show the second and third burns before ending the webcast at the start of the 3-hour coast.
Is that a possible theory?
I'm guessing they will do like they usually do and just pause and resume their live coverage as they have anything interesting to show.
Yeah, I don't think any part of this mission is classified, so I would think we will get the normal webcast.
I have a question about the length of the webcast.
Obviously, they’ll show the early ascent culminating with SECO-1 and the center core touchdown, but what I’m wondering is if they’ll show the second and third burns before ending the webcast at the start of the 3-hour coast.
Is that a possible theory?
I'm guessing they will do like they usually do and just pause and resume their live coverage as they have anything interesting to show.
Yeah, I don't think any part of this mission is classified, so I would think we will get the normal webcast.
So basically, they'll take a three-hour break before coming back with the end of mission?
I didn't mean by the webcast ending because of classification. I was judging it based off of how long the viewers would want to sit and watch.
I have a question about the length of the webcast.
Obviously, they’ll show the early ascent culminating with SECO-1 and the center core touchdown, but what I’m wondering is if they’ll show the second and third burns before ending the webcast at the start of the 3-hour coast.
Is that a possible theory?
I'm guessing they will do like they usually do and just pause and resume their live coverage as they have anything interesting to show.
Yeah, I don't think any part of this mission is classified, so I would think we will get the normal webcast.
So basically, they'll take a three-hour break before coming back with the end of mission?
I didn't mean by the webcast ending because of classification. I was judging it based off of how long the viewers would want to sit and watch.
IIRC when SpaceX has had a very long delay, they've just closed the webcast and told people to follow them on social media for deployment and updates. I doubt they'll play hold music for 3 hours and wait, especially given the launch is 30 minutes before midnight Eastern Daylight Time.
Note that at a briefing I just came from, the STP-2 mission manager said the second stage will just be disposed of in the DSX orbit.
Note that at a briefing I just came from, the STP-2 mission manager said the second stage will just be disposed of in the DSX orbit.
No surprise on that, tbh. Considering they dropped the deorbit burn and now it's just passivation of the second stage.
How many hours in advance will the press kit be released tomorrow?
https://twitter.com/exploreplanets/status/1141493728495845376
Here's Our First Look at LightSail 2 Installed on SpaceX's Falcon Heavy Rocket
How many hours in advance will the press kit be released tomorrow?Just posted it to the update thread.
https://twitter.com/exploreplanets/status/1141493728495845376
Here's Our First Look at LightSail 2 Installed on SpaceX's Falcon Heavy Rocket
Is this really the Prox1 satellite, where Lightsat is hitching it's ride? It looks more like a dummy (e.g. no solar cells, no camera or sensor apertures) holding the PPod. This is, what Prox1 was supposed to look like (https://prox-1.gatech.edu/):