ISS crew are going through Dragon ingress proceduresThey have to cover some sort of camera microphone with a cloth and capton "to mute the microphone".Sunita is wondering if it's to keep their conversations about Garrett Reisman secret
Quote from: Comga on 10/10/2012 10:23 pmQuote from: woods170 on 10/10/2012 11:18 amSpaceX narrowed the field of view of the LIDAR to prevent a repeat of the troubles encountered on C2+Do you know this for a fact or is this a logical deduction, based on statements from COTS-2+?It was said in either the pre-launch or post-launch press briefing by a SpaceX representative, but I don't know if it was physical or software field of view that was changed. Software might be easier? I remember reading or hearing from somewhere that they had inaccurate model of ISS in simulations and some reflection(s) from JEM were unexpectedly bright.
Quote from: woods170 on 10/10/2012 11:18 amSpaceX narrowed the field of view of the LIDAR to prevent a repeat of the troubles encountered on C2+Do you know this for a fact or is this a logical deduction, based on statements from COTS-2+?
SpaceX narrowed the field of view of the LIDAR to prevent a repeat of the troubles encountered on C2+
A poster retrieved from inside Dragon!
Quote from: olbob on 10/10/2012 08:13 pmSorry if OT...Suni mentioned that the Dragon was clean. The previous visiting Dragon was also described as clean. Is this just a comment on the Dragon's "new car" feel? Or are there some vehicles that don't arrive as clean? If so, what constitutes "not clean?" Just a few examples, which can go wrong and cause a "non clean" state:- electric defects -> smoke- leaky system, hydrazine inside the capsule- some liquid/gaseous cargo floats araound from broken containers - ...
Sorry if OT...Suni mentioned that the Dragon was clean. The previous visiting Dragon was also described as clean. Is this just a comment on the Dragon's "new car" feel? Or are there some vehicles that don't arrive as clean? If so, what constitutes "not clean?"
Quote from: JBF on 10/11/2012 12:40 amDid they ask for autographs? No they sent up a picture of the people who made the craft. Just like the automakers at Saturn used to do. Jim you need to chill a little.The picture wasn't on the manifest. Stowing unauthorized hardware is a no-no.
Did they ask for autographs? No they sent up a picture of the people who made the craft. Just like the automakers at Saturn used to do. Jim you need to chill a little.
The VBA (Vestibule Barrier Assembly), AKA "Vestibule Curtain", still needs to be installed.
Quote from: Space Pete on 10/10/2012 07:27 pmA poster retrieved from inside Dragon! <snip>The first commercial cargo carrier to the MIR and ISS never did anything like that.<more snip>
Quote from: Jim on 10/10/2012 11:55 pmQuote from: Space Pete on 10/10/2012 07:27 pmA poster retrieved from inside Dragon! <snip>The first commercial cargo carrier to the MIR and ISS never did anything like that.<more snip>OT question, but I hope the moderators bear with me:There was a commercial cargo carrier to MIR?
Quote from: woods170 on 10/11/2012 08:56 amQuote from: Jim on 10/10/2012 11:55 pmQuote from: Space Pete on 10/10/2012 07:27 pmA poster retrieved from inside Dragon! <snip>The first commercial cargo carrier to the MIR and ISS never did anything like that.<more snip>OT question, but I hope the moderators bear with me:There was a commercial cargo carrier to MIR?SPACEHAB (actually more of a "cargo carrier inside a spacecraft" service), where Jim used to work with.