Quote from: anonymous1138 on 08/06/2012 06:15 amQuote from: Kaputnik on 08/06/2012 06:04 amQuote from: robertross on 08/06/2012 06:02 amQuote from: JimOman on 08/06/2012 06:00 amQuote from: Jason1701 on 08/06/2012 05:54 amQuote from: clongton on 08/06/2012 05:53 am1.4 kg of fuel left onboardI heard it as 140.6 kgIt was 1.4Kg, can't be 140Kg- too much.Jim Yeah, I figured that number was too high. They must have mis-reported it.I'm sure I heard 140.6kg. Remember the descent stage started out with 390kg propellant aboard so seems a good number to me, given a smooth descent without complications.You did hear 140.6, as I did. That's right.There is a margin, but I didn't think it was that big.There's an update to this paper (this one is 2006), but I can't find it at the moment:http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20090007730_2009006430.pdfPage 13 says the +/- 3 sigma fuel consumption should be between 284.2 kg and 312.8 kg. That should have left 77.2 kg to 105.8 kg to spare.
Quote from: Kaputnik on 08/06/2012 06:04 amQuote from: robertross on 08/06/2012 06:02 amQuote from: JimOman on 08/06/2012 06:00 amQuote from: Jason1701 on 08/06/2012 05:54 amQuote from: clongton on 08/06/2012 05:53 am1.4 kg of fuel left onboardI heard it as 140.6 kgIt was 1.4Kg, can't be 140Kg- too much.Jim Yeah, I figured that number was too high. They must have mis-reported it.I'm sure I heard 140.6kg. Remember the descent stage started out with 390kg propellant aboard so seems a good number to me, given a smooth descent without complications.You did hear 140.6, as I did. That's right.
Quote from: robertross on 08/06/2012 06:02 amQuote from: JimOman on 08/06/2012 06:00 amQuote from: Jason1701 on 08/06/2012 05:54 amQuote from: clongton on 08/06/2012 05:53 am1.4 kg of fuel left onboardI heard it as 140.6 kgIt was 1.4Kg, can't be 140Kg- too much.Jim Yeah, I figured that number was too high. They must have mis-reported it.I'm sure I heard 140.6kg. Remember the descent stage started out with 390kg propellant aboard so seems a good number to me, given a smooth descent without complications.
Quote from: JimOman on 08/06/2012 06:00 amQuote from: Jason1701 on 08/06/2012 05:54 amQuote from: clongton on 08/06/2012 05:53 am1.4 kg of fuel left onboardI heard it as 140.6 kgIt was 1.4Kg, can't be 140Kg- too much.Jim Yeah, I figured that number was too high. They must have mis-reported it.
Quote from: Jason1701 on 08/06/2012 05:54 amQuote from: clongton on 08/06/2012 05:53 am1.4 kg of fuel left onboardI heard it as 140.6 kgIt was 1.4Kg, can't be 140Kg- too much.Jim
Quote from: clongton on 08/06/2012 05:53 am1.4 kg of fuel left onboardI heard it as 140.6 kg
1.4 kg of fuel left onboard
140kg prop remaining... So they could've landed another 100kg, right?
Were there this many hi-fives for MER? Are high-fives kind of more trendy now?
Quote from: Robotbeat on 08/06/2012 06:31 am140kg prop remaining... So they could've landed another 100kg, right? Wasn't that before flyaway?
Russian rad detector, Spanish weather sensors.
HOLY ----Touchdown confirmed!
Quote from: iamlucky13 on 08/06/2012 06:25 amThere is a margin, but I didn't think it was that big.There's an update to this paper (this one is 2006), but I can't find it at the moment:http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20090007730_2009006430.pdfPage 13 says the +/- 3 sigma fuel consumption should be between 284.2 kg and 312.8 kg. That should have left 77.2 kg to 105.8 kg to spare.Going from memory, 4 thrusters at 800 lbs each (3200 lbs) and hydrazine Isp at ~230 gives about 14 lbs/sec (6.4 Kg/sec). So, they had about ten seconds of propellant left. Seems about right. Certainly NOT 1.4 kg. Not sure on these numbers, but think they are close.
There is a margin, but I didn't think it was that big.There's an update to this paper (this one is 2006), but I can't find it at the moment:http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20090007730_2009006430.pdfPage 13 says the +/- 3 sigma fuel consumption should be between 284.2 kg and 312.8 kg. That should have left 77.2 kg to 105.8 kg to spare.
Who is the guy with the mohawk?