Author Topic: LIVE: CCiCAP Commercial Crew Awards Announcements - August 3, 2012  (Read 76793 times)

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Correction to milestone dates end April/May 2014 on charts…
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline manboy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Texas, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 134
  • Likes Given: 544
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 03:45 pm by manboy »
"Cheese has been sent into space before. But the same cheese has never been sent into space twice." - StephenB

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Gerst: Can’t provide job numbers, said to ask companies…
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Optional milestones for SNC to get to CDR...
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
ULA wants Human Rating for Atlas V as a kit format to each customer needs with a lot in common…

End...
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 03:51 pm by Rocket Science »
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline Norm Hartnett

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2310
  • Liked: 74
  • Likes Given: 5
Whew, there was a lot of meat in that news conference.

Redacted SAA's should be avaliable by close of business today.

I have to say that my belief in NASA  and the Commercial Crew process has undergone a sea change. Well done to the entire NASA CC team.
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 03:54 pm by Norm Hartnett »
“You can’t take a traditional approach and expect anything but the traditional results, which has been broken budgets and not fielding any flight hardware.” Mike Gold - Apollo, STS, CxP; those that don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it: SLS.

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
One of the more subtle points that was mentionned is whether they have decided to go ahead with the CCiCap optional milestones phase or not. My understanding from Phil McAlister's answer is that they have not yet decided if they will go ahead or not with the CCiCap optional milestones phase.  They said that they would have an industry day shortly to discuss how they want to do the contract phase.

In short, more lobbying will be necessary in order to maintain SAAs for test flights...
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 03:59 pm by yg1968 »

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Another point that was mentionned by Gerst is that the selection statement should be released in about a week or a week and a half.
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 04:02 pm by yg1968 »

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Telecon audio attached...volume level is a little high to me, so be aware of that.

Offline Chris Bergin

Excellent work guys. Managed to finish my article. Will be on in 30 mins.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Telecon audio attached...volume level is a little high to me, so be aware of that.

Thanks! I was hoping that someone would record it. It was a very meaty conference call. Good to have all of it in a file as a reference.

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
My take of the Q&A (resulting before any spin is read)

1) two full shares Boeing  & SpaceX  ˝ to SNC
2) overall goal milestone is a test crew to ISS for Boeing & SpaceX
3) SNC is in the backup role for this program and its goals are different, and if successful more goals and funds might be added in the future
4) Boeing has very detailed 19 milestones reaching goal of test crew in 2016
5) SpaceX goals on paper say they can do a test crew in 2015; NASA feels however 2017 is closer.
6) Other unfunded SSA contracts are welcome and a review of the program will be done in 21 months.

2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
So it sounds like Blue Origin didn't even "bid" on CCiCAP. Did I hear that correctly?

I don't recall hearing Blue Origin either in the group of 7 companies that submitted a proposal.

I just listened to the begining of the audio file that Philipp just provided us and Blue Origin and Excalibur Almaz did not submit proposals. ATK made it as one of the four finalists as we already knew.

The other companies that submitted proposals but that were not finalists were:
-Space Operations and Company;
-American Aerospace;
-Space Design.
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 04:36 pm by yg1968 »

Offline Chris Bergin

And the baseline article for this annoumcement.

Lots of specific articles to come.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/08/nasa-ccicap-funding-spacex-boeing-sncs-crew-vehicles/
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online Lee Jay

  • Elite Veteran
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8625
  • Liked: 3702
  • Likes Given: 334
And the baseline article for this annoumcement.

Lots of specific articles to come.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/08/nasa-ccicap-funding-spacex-boeing-sncs-crew-vehicles/

I don't know how you throw those together so fast, and so well.  Great baseline.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
I really want to know what SpaceX is planning for a Max-Q test. Full Falcon 9? Just the first stage (dummy second)? Something like an old peacekeeper missile (doubtful)? Maybe even a modified Grasshopper or the prototype for their reusable Falcon 9 first stage? The last one is unlikely, but SpaceX does weird stuff sometimes.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Chris Bergin

And the baseline article for this annoumcement.

Lots of specific articles to come.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/08/nasa-ccicap-funding-spacex-boeing-sncs-crew-vehicles/

I don't know how you throw those together so fast, and so well.  Great baseline.

Thanks! Would have been a lot faster if my PC hadn't slowed down to a snail to get that massive Dream Chaser video on L2! :D
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Lars_J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6160
  • California
  • Liked: 677
  • Likes Given: 195
And the baseline article for this annoumcement.

Lots of specific articles to come.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/08/nasa-ccicap-funding-spacex-boeing-sncs-crew-vehicles/

Nice article!

I do find one thing curious, though - Why is 'Liberty' the first image in the article, even though it was not selected?  ;)

Offline Chris Bergin

And the baseline article for this annoumcement.

Lots of specific articles to come.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/08/nasa-ccicap-funding-spacex-boeing-sncs-crew-vehicles/

Nice article!

I do find one thing curious, though - Why is 'Liberty' the first image in the article, even though it was not selected?  ;)

Thanks! The main body was about the winners. I covered the announcement and the loser first - although the first actual image is the lead image - thanks to Strangequark - and that was the three winners! ;)
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 06:21 pm by Chris Bergin »
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online Lee Jay

  • Elite Veteran
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8625
  • Liked: 3702
  • Likes Given: 334
And the baseline article for this annoumcement.

Lots of specific articles to come.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/08/nasa-ccicap-funding-spacex-boeing-sncs-crew-vehicles/

I don't know how you throw those together so fast, and so well.  Great baseline.

Thanks! Would have been a lot faster if my PC hadn't slowed down to a snail to get that massive Dream Chaser video on L2! :D

That's one of the best - if not the best - CGI I've seen on any of these vehicles.  So it was worth it!

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1