Author Topic: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread  (Read 261022 times)

Offline kirghizstan

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
  • Liked: 179
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #100 on: 08/03/2012 01:02 pm »
James Dean ‏@flatoday_jdean
NASA's "CCiCap" awards go to...Boeing ($460 million), SpaceX ($440 million), Sierra Nevada Corp. ($212.5 million).

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37821
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22052
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #101 on: 08/03/2012 01:05 pm »
Once we officially know, can anyone in the loop say if the announced winners were always the winners, or did politics force a change over the course of the last two weeks?

no

Offline Chris Bergin

Once we officially know, can anyone in the loop say if the announced winners were always the winners, or did politics force a change over the course of the last two weeks?

no

Great post Jim.

To expanded, we're unlikely to know such a thing, for obvious reasons. Although it appears a pretty solid (no pun intended) decision.
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 01:07 pm by Chris Bergin »
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline wolfpack

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 743
  • Wake Forest, NC
  • Liked: 160
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #103 on: 08/03/2012 01:07 pm »
no

Shall I take that to mean "you can't say"?

Offline kirghizstan

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
  • Liked: 179
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #104 on: 08/03/2012 01:09 pm »
Although it appears a pretty solid (no pun intended) decision.
^^^^
#COTD

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37821
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22052
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #105 on: 08/03/2012 01:10 pm »
no

Shall I take that to mean "you can't say"?

Nobody can say

Offline wolfpack

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 743
  • Wake Forest, NC
  • Liked: 160
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #106 on: 08/03/2012 01:13 pm »
Nobody can say

Got it. Wait for the history books, then.

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #107 on: 08/03/2012 01:18 pm »
"We have selected three companies that will help keep us on track to end the outsourcing of human spaceflight and create high-paying jobs in Florida and elsewhere across the country." - Charlie Bolden, NASA Administrator..

Someone wanna explain to him the difference between offshoring and outsourcing?

I've heard people complain that Bolden just reads what Obama writes for him, but that's ridiculous!

Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline SolSystem

  • Member
  • Posts: 52
  • SpaceQ/SpaceRef
  • London, Ontario
  • Liked: 60
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #108 on: 08/03/2012 01:18 pm »
Commercial Crew Program Funding: Boeing $460 million, SpaceX $440M, Sierra Nevada $212.5M
Editor-in-Chief, SpaceQ, co-founder SpaceRef, host of the Space Economy podcast.

Offline Chris Bergin

Anyone fancy creating a nice three vehicle graphic around the 1300 (long) x550 (high) aspect ratio? :)
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online Lee Jay

  • Elite Veteran
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8625
  • Liked: 3702
  • Likes Given: 334
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #110 on: 08/03/2012 01:30 pm »
Is the difference between a full-award and a half award the difference between a test flight to orbit and no test flight to orbit?

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #111 on: 08/03/2012 01:34 pm »
Is the difference between a full-award and a half award the difference between a test flight to orbit and no test flight to orbit?

No the test flights are likely to be part of the CCiCcap optional milestones period. So they are not part of the $1B that is  being awarded today. 

Offline Drkskywxlt

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 152
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #112 on: 08/03/2012 01:39 pm »
Quote
"If you total all the billions that have been spent into my system before I started, it's probably approaching $10 billion. So I've got a huge head start."

That's one screwed up metric for evaluating a "head start".

But but but...Jay Barbaree said Liberty was developed without a dime of government money!
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 01:42 pm by Drkskywxlt »

Offline vt_hokie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3055
  • Hazlet, NJ
  • Liked: 118
  • Likes Given: 449
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #113 on: 08/03/2012 01:42 pm »
So, now that the numbers are official, is "half" funding for DreamChaser enough to keep the dream alive?

Offline Go4TLI

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 816
  • Liked: 96
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #114 on: 08/03/2012 01:44 pm »
So, now that the numbers are official, is "half" funding for DreamChaser enough to keep the dream alive?

Of course.  They would not enter into it if otherwise.

Online Lee Jay

  • Elite Veteran
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8625
  • Liked: 3702
  • Likes Given: 334
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #115 on: 08/03/2012 01:46 pm »
So, now that the numbers are official, is "half" funding for DreamChaser enough to keep the dream alive?

I'm not quite sure I understand this process - if this is just a selection or if it's announcing a full contract award.  If the contract is awarded, then SNC accepted the award and signed the contract, thus they intend to do the work.  I'm unclear how a partial award will affect which work gets done.  If it all gets done, this would seem to me to mean SNC has to fund the other half themselves.  If not, what is not going to get done versus what would have been done had they received a full award?

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #116 on: 08/03/2012 01:46 pm »
Commercial Crew Program Funding: Boeing $460 million, SpaceX $440M, Sierra Nevada $212.5M

I didn't say anything but I had trouble believing the rumor from last night that SpaceX had gotten the half award. If the priority objective of the commercial crew program is quick access to the ISS, giving a full award to SpaceX makes more sense than giving them a half award. 

Offline strangequark

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1072
  • Co-Founder, Tesseract Space
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Liked: 226
  • Likes Given: 12
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #117 on: 08/03/2012 01:49 pm »
Anyone fancy creating a nice three vehicle graphic around the 1300 (long) x550 (high) aspect ratio? :)

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #118 on: 08/03/2012 01:50 pm »
Commercial Crew Program Funding: Boeing $460 million, SpaceX $440M, Sierra Nevada $212.5M

I didn't say anything but I had trouble believing the rumor from last night that SpaceX had gotten the half award. If the priority objective of the commercial crew program is quick access to the ISS, giving a full award to SpaceX makes more sense than giving them a half award. 
I still think its fine with ULA going forward to man rate Atlas V…
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: The CCiCAP Award (PRE- and Post-AWARD DISCUSSION) Thread
« Reply #119 on: 08/03/2012 01:51 pm »
So, now that the numbers are official, is "half" funding for DreamChaser enough to keep the dream alive?

I'm not quite sure I understand this process - if this is just a selection or if it's announcing a full contract award.  If the contract is awarded, then SNC accepted the award and signed the contract, thus they intend to do the work.  I'm unclear how a partial award will affect which work gets done.  If it all gets done, this would seem to me to mean SNC has to fund the other half themselves.  If not, what is not going to get done versus what would have been done had they received a full award?

I am guessing that two contracts (a full award and a partial award contract) were pre-signed by each company and the only signature missing on these contracts was NASA's signature. NASA probably signed the documents this morning (or yesterday). Obviously, it's not a contract until both parties sign the agreements. So the agreements that were not signed by NASA get discarded.
« Last Edit: 08/03/2012 01:52 pm by yg1968 »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0