Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - Jason 3 - SLC-4E Vandenberg - Jan 17, 2016 - DISCUSSION  (Read 594358 times)

Offline AJA

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
  • Per Aspera Ad Ares, Per Aspera Ad Astra
  • India
  • Liked: 146
  • Likes Given: 212
<land in a pool of water>

This has been brought up here in the forums ad nauseum (along with nets, or controlled capture units or docking units). They don't work. The masses involved are too large.

I figured. Any post/thread in specific you remember? No worries if not. I'll search later.

Offline dorkmo

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 711
  • Liked: 339
  • Likes Given: 848
<land in a pool of water>

This has been brought up here in the forums ad nauseum (along with nets, or controlled capture units or docking units). They don't work. The masses involved are too large.

chuck-e-cheese ball pit??

Offline Tonioroffo

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 131
  • Belgium
  • Liked: 83
  • Likes Given: 107
So Elon tweeted one of the legs didn't latch.  The touchdown speed was good!!
« Last Edit: 01/17/2016 07:22 pm by Tonioroffo »

Offline QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9266
  • Australia
  • Liked: 4489
  • Likes Given: 1126
A slightly different tone than after ORBCOMM2?

Jeff Bezos on Twitter: "Impressive launch and @SpaceX will soon make Falcon 9 landings routine – so good for space! Kudos SpaceX!"

Yeah, how boring. We're never going to see a SpaceX vs Blue Origin dance-off with this attitude.

Human spaceflight is basically just LARPing now.

Offline Dante80

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
  • Athens : Greece
  • Liked: 835
  • Likes Given: 540
A slightly different tone than after ORBCOMM2?

Jeff Bezos on Twitter: "Impressive launch and @SpaceX will soon make Falcon 9 landings routine – so good for space! Kudos SpaceX!"

After the last two months twitter wars between the two, it is both refreshing and exciting to see a tweet like the above. Hope that mr Musk reciprocates in the future too, there is a difference between competition and bitter rivalry.

Good game Jeff!

Offline The Amazing Catstronaut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Arsia Mons, Mars, Sol IV, Inner Solar Solar System, Sol system.
  • Liked: 759
  • Likes Given: 626
Seems the (likely) loss of stage wasn't related to the stage tipping under the sea state, although it may have done regardless, we don't know. Seems one of the legs didn't lock correctly - exactly the same thing would have occurred if it had returned to launch site.

Now everybody stop bullying that sweet innocent drone ship. :X  It's not her fault she's clumsy. :(
« Last Edit: 01/17/2016 07:25 pm by The Amazing Catstronaut »
Resident feline spaceflight expert. Knows nothing of value about human spaceflight.

Offline wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5519
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 3222
  • Likes Given: 3986
So Elon tweeted one of the legs didn't latch.  The touchdown speed was good!!


Been wondering when we would see a mechanical problem like this or a fairing, staging to spacecraft separation issue.

This is best case problem because the payload still made it.
Starship, Vulcan and Ariane 6 have all reached orbit.  New Glenn, well we are waiting!

Offline PreferToLurk

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
  • Liked: 388
  • Likes Given: 196
So Elon tweeted one of the legs didn't latch.  The touchdown speed was good!!

That's actually great news. Especially with the follow up tweet about it "probably" happening even if landing on land.  This means that this "test" discovered a bug that (if fixed properly) will make all future landings more reliable.  In addition, it also bodes well for future barge landings if the problem was not specific to the added challenges inherent with barge landings.

Offline Dante80

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
  • Athens : Greece
  • Liked: 835
  • Likes Given: 540
Bad latch...baaadd..

Hope they get as much data as possible from it, although the problem might already be fixed in the next iteration.

Offline a_godumov

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
  • Bulgaria
  • Liked: 8
  • Likes Given: 0
In my opinion it is very impressive that they can provide the cause of the failure so quickly. And it is also interesting that this landing may have been a success without this glitch. I hope this issue is easy to solve.

Offline punder

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Liked: 1858
  • Likes Given: 1472
Bad latch...baaadd..

Hope they get as much data as possible from it, although the problem might already be fixed in the next iteration.

Better than if it had been the sea state. A latch is something SpaceX can fix. Mother Nature is something it can't. Yet.  :)
« Last Edit: 01/17/2016 07:29 pm by punder »

Offline The Amazing Catstronaut

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1065
  • Arsia Mons, Mars, Sol IV, Inner Solar Solar System, Sol system.
  • Liked: 759
  • Likes Given: 626


Been wondering when we would see a mechanical problem like this or a fairing, staging to spacecraft separation issue.

This is best case problem because the payload still made it.

The legs probably count among the least mission critical moving parts of the whole rocket. Their checks are certainly less extensive than anything required for the primary mission. If I was SpaceX I wouldn't throw too much oversight their way.

Haven't they updated the leg design recently? It's entirely probably they suspected an event of this nature would happen to a 1.1, or have prior data. It may have already been solved before we were aware of its existence.
« Last Edit: 01/17/2016 07:30 pm by The Amazing Catstronaut »
Resident feline spaceflight expert. Knows nothing of value about human spaceflight.

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385

In my opinion it is very impressive that they can provide the cause of the failure so quickly. And it is also interesting that this landing may have been a success without this glitch. I hope this issue is easy to solve.

They probably have the first video of the landing, which may have made the cause obvious.

Offline Tonioroffo

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 131
  • Belgium
  • Liked: 83
  • Likes Given: 107
So Elon tweeted one of the legs didn't latch.  The touchdown speed was good!!

That's actually great news. Especially with the follow up tweet about it "probably" happening even if landing on land.  This means that this "test" discovered a bug that (if fixed properly) will make all future landings more reliable.  In addition, it also bodes well for future barge landings if the problem was not specific to the added challenges inherent with barge landings.
The legs are improved on 1.1FT, so maybe it's already fixed.  Anyone have insight if this stage had the "old" legs?

Offline Ben the Space Brit

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7209
  • A spaceflight fan
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 814
  • Likes Given: 903
In my opinion it is very impressive that they can provide the cause of the failure so quickly. And it is also interesting that this landing may have been a success without this glitch. I hope this issue is easy to solve.

It's worth noting that this core was in storage for quite a while and that this is the last of its kind to fly an orbital mission. Whilst I'm sure Space-X will be double-checking all the latches on future cores, I don't think that this will necessarily be a often-repeating issue.
"Oops! I left the silly thing in reverse!" - Duck Dodgers

~*~*~*~

The Space Shuttle Program - 1981-2011

The time for words has passed; The time has come to put up or shut up!
DON'T PROPAGANDISE, FLY!!!

Offline JazzFan

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 225
  • Florida
  • Liked: 49
  • Likes Given: 115
Bad latch...baaadd..

Hope they get as much data as possible from it, although the problem might already be fixed in the next iteration.

Better than if it had the sea state. A latch is something SpaceX can fix. Mother Nature is something it can't. Yet.  :)

Just wondering if it is a fix that can be in place before the next landing attempt?

Offline hopalong

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 155
  • Milton Keynes
  • Liked: 79
  • Likes Given: 76
So Elon tweeted one of the legs didn't latch.  The touchdown speed was good!!


Been wondering when we would see a mechanical problem like this or a fairing, staging to spacecraft separation issue.

This is best case problem because the payload still made it.

Yes, we must not forget that the Falcon has delivered Jason 3 to the correct orbit - I think the NASA quote was 'right on the money'.

If the landing issue was a latch issue, that can be fixed.

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
Bad latch...baaadd..

Hope they get as much data as possible from it, although the problem might already be fixed in the next iteration.

IIRC, the F9 Full Thrust has strengthened and upgraded legs. This was the previous version of v1.1 because of contract stipulations.
DM

Offline Halidon

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 848
  • whereabouts unknown
  • Liked: 180
  • Likes Given: 535
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-submersible

Is it possible to build a barge with submerged pontoons to avoid the effect of large swells?
The short answer that yes it's possible to build a floating recovery platform that is more isolated from surface wave action, but at a much higher cost than the converted cargo barges SpaceX is using.

Offline Dante80

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
  • Athens : Greece
  • Liked: 835
  • Likes Given: 540


IIRC, the F9 Full Thrust has strengthened and upgraded legs. This was the previous version of v1.1 because of contract stipulations.

Yes, but the problem could have persisted, even in a new design (if the specific parameters for unlatching remained constant, for example). Now, if they get the data for the malfunction, they can iterate on the design to remove the cause once and for all.  ;)

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1