Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 - Jason 3 - SLC-4E Vandenberg - Jan 17, 2016 - DISCUSSION  (Read 594357 times)

Offline Chris Bergin

Realigned the thread title for the latest NET.
« Last Edit: 12/11/2015 04:58 pm by Chris Bergin »
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline guckyfan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7442
  • Germany
  • Liked: 2336
  • Likes Given: 2900
Do we assume that tent will have to be gone befor January 17? I assume that until proven wrong.

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14669
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14676
  • Likes Given: 1420
Do we assume that tent will have to be gone befor January 17? I assume that until proven wrong.

The tent looked pretty long-term.  From seeing it, I assumed the west coast launch will be to a barge.
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline Johnnyhinbos

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3864
  • Boston, MA
  • Liked: 8095
  • Likes Given: 946
The 'tent' structure is on the landing complex. So perhaps they will opt for a barge landing and keep the tent up for whatever nefarious activity is going on under it...
John Hanzl. Author, action / adventure www.johnhanzl.com

Offline JamesH

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 525
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 284
  • Likes Given: 7
MCT/BFR mockup/launch party. That's my guess.

Offline whitelancer64

MCT/BFR mockup/launch party. That's my guess.

Much more likely that it was/is for construction, possibly keeping the sun off of the concrete as it dries to control the conditions it cures in as much as possible.

Do we assume that tent will have to be gone befor January 17? I assume that until proven wrong.

The tent looked pretty long-term.  From seeing it, I assumed the west coast launch will be to a barge.

It looked very temporary to me, it was attached to shipping containers that were resting on railroad ties.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline Johnnyhinbos

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3864
  • Boston, MA
  • Liked: 8095
  • Likes Given: 946
Don't think it's to do with construction for a variety of reasons, all discussed on the vandy thread. Plus user Helodriver posted this:

"Was out on base yesterday at SLC-4. The tent is complete, covering the central section of the future landing area.

Conversation with pad personnel confirmed its most definitely not for SpaceX's Christmas party. ;)"

A statement like that does not lead one to believe it's concrete work...
« Last Edit: 12/11/2015 06:48 pm by Johnnyhinbos »
John Hanzl. Author, action / adventure www.johnhanzl.com

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
Don't think it's to do with construction for a variety of reasons, all discussed on the vandy thread. Plus user Helodriver posted this:

"Was out on base yesterday at SLC-4. The tent is complete, covering the central section of the future landing area.

Conversation with pad personnel confirmed its most definitely not for SpaceX's Christmas party. ;)"

A statement like that does not lead one to believe it's concrete work...

The most likely explanation has always been that it is a temporary cover for work on pieces for the new FH capable transporter/erector. They can't work on it inside the hangar when preparations for Jason-3 are ongoing.

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14669
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14676
  • Likes Given: 1420
MCT/BFR mockup/launch party. That's my guess.

Much more likely that it was/is for construction, possibly keeping the sun off of the concrete as it dries to control the conditions it cures in as much as possible.

Do we assume that tent will have to be gone befor January 17? I assume that until proven wrong.

The tent looked pretty long-term.  From seeing it, I assumed the west coast launch will be to a barge.

It looked very temporary to me, it was attached to shipping containers that were resting on railroad ties.
To quantify...  By "Pretty long term" I meant a few months, or easily past the next launch
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Offline llanitedave

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2284
  • Nevada Desert
  • Liked: 1542
  • Likes Given: 2060
Judging from previous dropped hints, I'm going to guess it's for a presentation/announcement following a successful RTF.
"I've just abducted an alien -- now what?"

Offline wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5519
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 3222
  • Likes Given: 3986
Don't think it's to do with construction for a variety of reasons, all discussed on the vandy thread. Plus user Helodriver posted this:

"Was out on base yesterday at SLC-4. The tent is complete, covering the central section of the future landing area.

Conversation with pad personnel confirmed its most definitely not for SpaceX's Christmas party. ;)"

A statement like that does not lead one to believe it's concrete work...

The most likely explanation has always been that it is a temporary cover for work on pieces for the new FH capable transporter/erector. They can't work on it inside the hangar when preparations for Jason-3 are ongoing.

Agreed, it's a hard large flat surface.  The weather, both temperatures and moisture at VAFB doesn't warrant that type of protection.
Starship, Vulcan and Ariane 6 have all reached orbit.  New Glenn, well we are waiting!

Offline Kabloona

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4847
  • Velocitas Eradico
  • Fortress of Solitude
  • Liked: 3432
  • Likes Given: 741
Judging from previous dropped hints, I'm going to guess it's for a presentation/announcement following a successful RTF.

Why would they do that 3,000 miles away from the site of the RTF?

Offline Johnnyhinbos

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3864
  • Boston, MA
  • Liked: 8095
  • Likes Given: 946

Judging from previous dropped hints, I'm going to guess it's for a presentation/announcement following a successful RTF.

Why would they do that 3,000 miles away from the site of the RTF?

Which is closer to Hawthorne...? You don't make a big (huge) big picture announcement when your last launch ended in an explosion...
John Hanzl. Author, action / adventure www.johnhanzl.com

Offline mme

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1510
  • Santa Barbara, CA, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Virgo Supercluster
  • Liked: 2034
  • Likes Given: 5383
Judging from previous dropped hints, I'm going to guess it's for a presentation/announcement following a successful RTF.

Why would they do that 3,000 miles away from the site of the RTF?
And remote from Hawthorne, where they made other announcements.  And it's really far from the major airports and population centers in CA.  And it's on an Air Force Base.  It's a logistically horrible place to host an event.
Space is not Highlander.  There can, and will, be more than one.

Offline Prober

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10348
  • Save the spin....I'm keeping you honest!
  • Nevada
  • Liked: 722
  • Likes Given: 729
Judging from previous dropped hints, I'm going to guess it's for a presentation/announcement following a successful RTF.

Why would they do that 3,000 miles away from the site of the RTF?

whatever it is security is assured on an afb; and look how they handled any new pics coming out of VAFB :(
« Last Edit: 12/15/2015 04:12 pm by Prober »
2017 - Everything Old is New Again.
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant..." --Isoroku Yamamoto

Offline Chris Bergin

Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33125
  • Likes Given: 8906
That also gives the launch time as 10:42:18 a.m. PST (18:42:18 UTC).
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline rower2000

  • Member
  • Posts: 70
  • Liked: 38
  • Likes Given: 19
That also gives the launch time as 10:42:18 a.m. PST (18:42:18 UTC).
Given the accuracy of that time, I take it as an instantaneous window?

Offline ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8494
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2103
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline Chris Bergin

December 17, 2015
MEDIA ADVISORY M30-15
NOAA’s Jason-3 Spacecraft Ready for Launch

The launch of Jason-3, an international mission led by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to continue U.S.- European satellite measurements of the topography of the ocean surfaces, is scheduled for launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on Sunday, Jan. 17, 2016.  Liftoff aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg’s Space Launch Complex 4 East is targeted for 10:42:18 a.m. PST (1:42:18 p.m. EST) at the opening of a 30-second launch window. If needed, a backup launch opportunity is available on the Western Range on Jan. 18 at 10:31:04 a.m. PST (1:31:04 p.m. EST).

Jason-3 will maintain the ability to monitor and precisely measure global sea surface heights, monitor the intensification of tropical cyclones and support seasonal and coastal forecasts. Data from Jason-3 will support scientific, commercial and practical applications related to ocean circulation and climate change.  Additionally, Jason-3 data will be applied to fisheries management, marine industries and research into human impacts on the world’s oceans.

The mission is planned to last at least three years with a goal of five years.

Jason-3 is a four-agency international partnership consisting of NOAA, NASA, the French Space Agency CNES (Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales), and EUMETSAT (the European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites). Thales Alenia of France built the spacecraft.

NOAA in collaboration with the international European partners is responsible for the Jason-3 mission. JPL is responsible for NASA Jason-3 project management. NASA’s Launch Services Program at the agency’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida provides launch management. SpaceX of Hawthorne, California, is NASA’s launch service provider of the Falcon 9 rocket.

ACCREDITATION

News media desiring accreditation for the prelaunch and launch activities for Jason-3 should contact:

Tech. Sgt. Tyrona Lawson
30th Space Wing Public Affairs Office
Vandenberg Air Force Base, California 93437
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0